Molly Brown tager vand ind

Diverse — Drokles on January 24, 2010 at 9:15 pm

Den usynkelige Molly Brown alias Rajendra Panchauri er under stigende pres for sagen om de ikke-smeltende gletchere, som man kan se her på Al Jazeera (Hattip EU referendum)

Med gletcherne stilles der også andre spørgsmål ved IPCCs arbejdsmetoder og magien, der hedder “konsensus” og “dette-er-for-vigtigt-til-at-diskutere” falder væk. Tilbage står små mænd nøgne i den globale kulde. Geoffrey Lean skriver i Telegraph

It is time for the embattled Rajendra Pachauri to resign as Chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPPC), He is steadfastly refusing to go, but his position is becoming more and more untenable by the day, and the official climate science body will continue to leach credibility while he remains in charge.

Det hober sig nemlig op med løgne og aviserne er begyndt at lugte blod.

THE United Nations climate science panel faces new controversy for wrongly linking global warming to an increase in the number and severity of natural disasters such as hurricanes and floods.

It based the claims on an unpublished report that had not been subjected to routine scientific scrutiny — and ignored warnings from scientific advisers that the evidence supporting the link too weak. The report’s own authors later withdrew the claim because they felt the evidence was not strong enough.

Her er ikke tale om sagen med gletcherne der ville smelte i løbet af de næste 20-30 år trods det at gennemsnitstemperaturen er ganske meget under frysepunktet, her er tale om andre løgne uden indhold. Og det er ikke blot pinligt, men ganske alvorligt for på disse løgne skulle der træffes beslutninger, som Times Online også minder om

The claim by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), that global warming is already affecting the severity and frequency of global disasters, has since become embedded in political and public debate. It was central to discussions at last month’s Copenhagen climate summit, including a demand by developing countries for compensation of $100 billion (£62 billion) from the rich nations blamed for creating the most emissions.

Ed Miliband, the energy and climate change minister, has suggested British and overseas floods — such as those in Bangladesh in 2007 — could be linked to global warming. Barack Obama, the US president, said last autumn: “More powerful storms and floods threaten every continent.”

Last month Gordon Brown, the prime minister, told the Commons that the financial agreement at Copenhagen “must address the great injustice that . . . those hit first and hardest by climate change are those that have done least harm”.

Og det var præcis, hvad man ville. I sagen om Himalayas gletchere indrømmer forskere nu at der var en bevidst dagsorden. Fra Mail Online (Hattip WUWT)

The scientist behind the bogus claim in a Nobel Prize-winning UN report that Himalayan glaciers will have melted by 2035 last night admitted it was included purely to put political pressure on world leaders.

Pachauri er ganske givet en anløben person, men han er et symptom, frem for et problem. Det er IPCCs virksomhed, der er under anklage en virksomhed, der handler om politik og magt og korruption.

Having been forced to apologise over the 2035 claim, Dr Pachauri blamed Dr Lal, saying his team had failed to apply IPCC procedures.

It was an accusation rebutted angrily by Dr Lal. ‘We as authors followed them to the letter,’ he said. ‘Had we received information that undermined the claim, we would have included it.’

I England er man endelig ved at vågne officielt. Watts Up With That fortæller at parlamentet starter en høring

The Science and Technology Committee today announces an inquiry into the unauthorised publication of data, emails and documents relating to the work of the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia (UEA). The Committee has agreed to examine and invite written submissions on three questions: —What are the implications of the disclosures for the integrity of scientific research?

—Are the terms of reference and scope of the Independent Review announced on 3 December 2009 by UEA adequate (see below)?

—How independent are the other two international data sets?

The Committee intends to hold an oral evidence session in March 2010.

Jeg glæder mig til at de hjemlige medier tager sagen alvorligt og skider hul i deres loyalitet til den “klimaredaktør” de alle har ansat mindst en af.

0 Kommentarer »

Ingen kommentarer endnu.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Kommentér indlægget...

Monokultur kører på WordPress