Piers Corbyn forudser kuldeperiode

Diverse — Drokles on December 26, 2009 at 1:24 pm

Counterpunch beskriver, hvorledes kernen af forskere, der promoverer CO2 teorien, som definitiv, afgjort og hævder videnskabelig konsensus privat er i dyb tvivl

…Kenneth Trenberth, a senior scientist and the head of the climate analysis section of the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colo. On October 14, 2009, he wrote to the CRU’s Tom: “How come you do not agree with a statement that says we are no where close to knowing where energy is going or whether clouds are changing to make the planet brighter. We are not close to balancing the energy budget. The fact that we can not account for what is happening in the climate system makes any consideration of geoengineering quite hopeless as we will never be able to tell if it is successful or not! It is a travesty!”

In other words, only a few weeks before the Copenhagen summit, here is a scientist in the inner AGW circle disclosing that “we are not close to knowing” whether the supposedly proven agw model of the earth’s climate actually works, and that therefore “geo-engineering” – global carbon-mitigation, for example – is “hopeless”.

This admission edges close to acknowledgement of a huge core problem – that “greenhouse” theory and the vaunted greenhouse models violate the second law of thermodynamics which says that a cooler body cannot warm a hotter body XX. Greenhouse gasses in the cold upper atmosphere, even when warmed a bit by absorbed infrared, cannot possibly transfer heat to the warmer earth, and in fact radiate their absorbed heat into outer space. Readers interested in the science can read mathematical physicist Gerhard Gerlich’s and Ralf  Tscheuchner’s detailed paper published in The International Journal of Modern Physics, updated in January , 2009, “”.

En, som ikke er i tivivl er Piers Corbyn, der lever af at forudsige ekstremt vejr op til et år frem i tiden. Han afviser rask væk at CO2 er relevant for vejret og forudser i stedet en periode, hvor klimaet bliver koldere i op til 100 år.

1. Contrary to the projections of the UN and Governments the world has been cooling since
2002/3 while CO2 has been rising rapidly.

(see

http://climaterealists.com/index.php?id=2331 and

WeatherAction
end
year
report
2008

http://www.lowefo.com/pdf/News081229Word.pdf )

2. Global warming is over and it never was anything to do with mankind.
There is no evidence that CO2 fluctuations in the last 200, 2,000 or 20,000 years have caused
warming or climate change, in fact the evidence is the other way around.

( See Challenge to IME http://www.lowefo.com/pdf/MIE090213_Where_Evidence.pdf )

3. There is no evidence of more extreme weather events or increases in the rate of sea level rise or
changes in glaciers corresponding to CO2 increases since the industrial revolution.

( See Effects of CO2 Nicholson & Soon http://www.heartland.org/custom/semod_policybot/pdf/22434.pdf )

4. All changes in the Arctic and Antarctic follow natural and highly variable patterns which are
not new or special and have been recorded for over a thousand years and have been very well
known to the British navy** for a long time and available in the Met Office library The Antarctic has
been cooling for decades and the Arctic has started to cool in the last year or two. Break-up of ice is a
natural process - like the falling down of old trees - and has been happening for millions of years
before news media noticed it.

5. All the UN & Govt forecasts of ongoing warming this century have failed and the UN has still
refused to produce evidence of their claims despite reasonable requests by an international group of
science experts.

(See Letter to UN Sec General 14 July 2008 http://www.tech-know.eu/uploads/Letter_UN_Sec_Gen_Ban_Ki-moon.pdf)

6. Extreme weather and climate change events can be predicted months or years ahead using
solar activity whereas standard meteorology and CO2 dogma cannot do this.

(PowerPoint & Audio of Piers Corbyn’s & Other Presentations at International Climate Change Conference New
York 8-10 March 2009 www.heartland.org/events/NewYork09/proceedings.html - section V track 1 see slide 28
for world Temperature forecast to 2030. Scroll for speeches by Prof Bob Carter, Prof Richard Lindzen, Lord
Monckton and others)

A Layman’s Explanation of Why Global Warming Predictions by Climate Models are Wrong by Dr Roy Spencer -
http://climaterealists.com/index.php?id=3513

7. The Met office long range forecasts for summer 2007, summer 2008 and winter 2008/09 were
the opposite of what occurred while solar-based (Solar Weather Technique) forecasts

correctly foresaw the floods, more floods and heavy snow in each of those seasons.

Som han bygger på følgende teori

3 Kommentarer »

  1. Ingen har tilsyneladende tænkt på isens enorme tryk på jordskorpen ved polerne, is, som jo er vand i frossen form. Trykket flytter formodentligt blot andre steder hen på jordskorpen, hvis isen smelter. Hvor meget stiger vandspejlet så? -

    Hvorfor skulle det dog stige synderligt - eller falde? Nogle steder nok mere end andre.

    Jeg kan derimod godt forestille mig, at der under en istid er mindre vand at gøre godt med, hvis vandet er bundet til is. Men udløser istiden mange skyer eller få skyer? Man skal have oplevet det for at være sikker. Hvis meget vand er bundet i is, skulle jeg dog tro, at klimaet over det meste af Jorden ville være både tørt og bundfrossent.
    Hvorfor?
    Fordi solen i så fald ikke leverer varmen, og Jorden ikke kan absorbere den tilstrækkelige varme, producere nok drivhusgas, vanddamp og danne skyer mange nok til at holde på udstrålingen.

    Men det er ikke videnskab - kun tanker.

    Godt nytår.

    Comment by Emeritus — December 31, 2009 @ 2:20 am
  2. Bemærkelsesværdigt som mængden af katastrofale klima forudsigelser er dalet drastist efter klimacirkus ophør, nogen har maaske midstet troen.

    Comment by Sailor — December 31, 2009 @ 7:59 am
  3. Jo Emeritus nogle har skam tænkt på isens pres på jordskorpen og her er der heller ikke godt nyt idet mange spændinger vil blive udløst og give flere jordskælv. Klimatister advarede derfor om at den globale opvarmning udløste flere jordskælv og flere tsunamier. Hvad min lille Skoda dog ikke er skyld i.

    Comment by Drokles — January 3, 2010 @ 9:12 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Kommentér indlægget...

Monokultur kører på WordPress