Et uddrag fra klimadebatten

Diverse — Drokles on May 13, 2012 at 4:29 pm

BBC’s John Bell causerer over mænds forbrydelser

But consider also that the people who are most vocal in denying human responsibility for the disastrous effects of climate change are mostly male.

The people who control factories of wage slaves in the developing world are almost exclusively men, as are the commanders of terrorist regimes. Leaders who threaten or declare war are mostly men as are those involved in paedophile gangs.

While there are women who have been found guilty of this activity, to the best of my knowledge there have been no prosecutions of gangs of women. But there are untold networks of men who organise systematically the abuse of children.

(…)

It was men - who hugged their wives and kissed their children - who herded human beings into Nazi gas chambers.

Det er rigtigt, eller som Bell udtrykker det; “empirical proof”. Det er også rigtigt at det meste terror begås af muslimer, de fleste voldsforbrydelser begås af muslimer, der fleste overførselsindkomster udbetales til muslimer, de fleste flygtninge produceres af muslimer, de værste samfund består af muslimer, at pædofili er mere populært blandt muslimer, at pædofile helliggøres af muslimer, at slavehold legitimeres af muslimer, at intelligensen er lavere blandt muslimer (hø, hø, the Bell curve) osv. Men man kan til mænds fordel også tale om at de største bidrag til videnskab, kunst, samfund, infrastruktur osv. Omvendt er det svært at se et positivt bidrag fra den muslimske del af befolkningen. Men BBC accepterer ikke al empirical proof og nævner derfor ikke til klimabenægternes forsvar at Satellit målinger ikke støtter teorien om nogen igangværende opvarmning

uah_lt_1979_thru_april_2012

Climate Depot citerer videnskabsetikeren ved Penn State universitet Donald Brown fra et seminar der skal forandre det moralske klima i debatten om klimaforandring (deres ordspil, ikke mit!)

Watch Video of Brown and Mann here. (Brown’s comments on Climate Depot begin around 23:00 and his “new crimes against humanity” remark are around 24:50 mark – H/T to Tom Nelson)

Brown also unloaded on Climate Depot for posting his email address (Dab57@psu.edu) and he lamented the tactics and the impact of climate skeptics.

Brown: “Unfortunately there are consequences [for skepticism] — we’ve lost 25 years. This is not disinformation. I think we should encourage a conversation whether this is some kind of new crime against humanity. It is really evil stuff. It is nasty. It has profound consequences for people in Africa , small developing states. and the U.S. virtually standing alone has failed to act on climate change and this is why, I think.” [Climate Depot note: It is climate "solutions" that have profound consequences for people in Africa! See: 'The UN is saying to poor countries: 'Those of you who adopt more anti-prosperity, anti- jobs, and anti-growth policies, we will enrich you']

Brown appeared at a forum at Penn State’s University Park Campus. The forum included Penn State professors Michael Mann, Donald Brown, Janet Swim and Rick Schuhmann, and graduate student Peter Buckland. The title of the forum was “Changing the Moral Climate on Climate Change,” a talk that “focused on climate change denial.”

Brown singled out Climate Depot for its role as part of the alleged “new crime against humanity.”

“Probably the most troubling tactic at all. Cyber bullying. [Climate Depot] puts my picture and my personal email and within 48 hours you get hundreds of really nasty [emails] – some of them are up here, death threats, hate mail,” Brown said.

“Pure and pure, out and out intimidation. It’s really nasty, it’s pure intimidation,” Brown added.

Professor Peter J. Jacques spørger i en ny bog om hvorfor der er benægtelse

The question at hand is, “Why is there a social counter-movement that rejects climate change?” This article begins by first naming this counter-movement “climate denial” and working through the various apparent options by specifically looking at the scholarship on Holocaust denial for insight. Through this insight, we can understand the counter-movement as a reactionary force working to sow confusion for ideological reasons that promote a specific privilege. At the same time, privilege is also protected by the presentation of climate change science as a binary position of “acknowledgement or rejection” that itself promotes privilege and dysfunction across the intersection of science and society. In the end, at least one answer to the question “why denial?” appears to be “because it is serious and threatening” and this, at least partially, explains the existence of this counter-movement.

De fleste klimaforskere er, ligsom pædofile, naziforbrydere og slaveholdere, mænd.

1 Kommentar »

  1. Feminister er biologisk og kulturelt affald, og videnskabsetikeren og dennes profession er en parasit, ligesom det nye ‘Digital Etik’, der popper frem fra den mødding, der udgør dele af vestlig videnskab. Jeg ser det for mig:

    “Et Aristotelansk perspektiv på det postmoderne samfund og dydsetikerens tilgang til pornografiske internetsider, i relation til masturbation:

    1.) Hvad kan vi lære gennem selvrefleksiv interpretation af et Aristotelansk perspektiv på det postmoderne samfund?

    2.) Hvordan demonstreres dyden ved masturbation til internetpornografi?

    Ideen er hermed givet videre til fri afbenyttelse for eventuelle studerende, der måtte læse med.

    Comment by Progressiv Idiot — May 14, 2012 @ 12:59 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Kommentér indlægget...

Monokultur kører på WordPress