Gamle Helmuth Schmidt undsiger FN’s Klimapanel

Diverse — Drokles on March 8, 2011 at 5:22 am

I en tale til Max-Planck-Gesellschaft sagde den tidligere vesttyske kansler ifølge Global Warming Foundation bl.a

In addition to all the aforementioned problems caused by humans, we are also concerned, at the same time, by the phenomenon of global warming and its alleged consequences. We know that there have always been naturally occurring ice ages and warm periods; what we don’t know is how significant the human-induced contribution to present and future global warming is and will be.

The climate policy adopted by many governments is still in its infancy. The publications provided by an international group of scientists (the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC) have encountered skepticism, especially since some of their researchers have shown themselves to be fraudsters (Betrüger). In any case, some governments’ publicly stated targets are far less scientific, but rather politically endorsed.

It seems to me that the time has come that one of our top scientific organisations should scrutinise, under the microscope, the work of the IPCC, in a critical and realistical way, and then present the resulting conclusions to the German public in a comprehensible manner.

Det er selvfølgelig en hyggelig tanke at Schmidt stadig er i blandt os, men problemet med klimapanelet er at dets opgave ikke er videnskabelig, men politisk at finde argumenter til at reducere menneskets udledning af CO2. At de fremlagte beviser er tyndbenede og i enkelte tilfælde konstruerede er blot, hvad anstrengelserne kunne blive til. Eller med IPCCs egen formand Rajendra Pachauri egne ord, som de faldt i et interview med Times of India

Let’s face it, we are an intergovernmental body and our strength and acceptability of what we produce is largely because we are owned by governments. If that was not the case, then we would be like any other scientific body that maybe producing first-rate reports but don’t see the light of the day because they don’t matter in policy-making.

De har gjort, hvad de blev bedt om så godt de kunne.

0 Kommentarer »

Ingen kommentarer endnu.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Kommentér indlægget...

Monokultur kører på WordPress