Washington Times angriber Al Gore

Diverse — Drokles on March 10, 2010 at 7:01 am

Det er ikke meget fokus Climategate får i de almindelige medier, hvilket er synd - også for dem. Washington Times trækker dog i den rigtige retning og sætter med ganske banal journalistisk kritik fingeren der, hvor det gør ondt, nemlig pengene

The greatest scandal connected to global warming is not exaggeration, fraud or destruction of data to conceal the weakness of the argument. It is those who are personally profiting from promoting this fantasy at the expense of the rest of us.

Al Gore is the most visible beneficiary. The world’s greatest climate-change fear-monger has amassed millions in book sales and speaking fees. His science-fiction movie, “An Inconvenient Truth,” won an Academy Award for best documentary and 21 other film awards. He was co-recipient of the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize for his “efforts to build up and disseminate greater knowledge about man-made climate change, and to lay the foundations for the measures that are needed to counteract such change.”

Meanwhile, Mr. Gore was laying his own foundations. As he was whipping up hysteria over climate change, he cannily invested in “green” firms that stood to profit in the hundreds of millions of dollars (if not more) from increased government regulations and sweetheart deals from connected politicians and bureaucrats. The multimillionaire climate dilettante was given a free pass by reporters, who refused to ask him hard questions about the degree to which he was profiting from the panic he was causing.

Og mens Phil Jones, der ledede det forskningsteam, der leverede afgørende temperaturkurver til IPCC har indrømmet at temperaturen ikke er steget (men faldet omend ubetydeligt for alt andet end selve debatten) siden 2000, at stigningen siden midten af halvfjerserne ligner de stigninger man har målt siden industrialiseringens begyndelse og således ikke er markant, hvad CO2 teorien ellers hævder og at Middelalderens varmeperiode efter alt at dømme var reel og sikkert også varmere end i dag, hvilket betyder at temperaturen ingenlunde er markant, hvad CO2 teorien ellers hævder og slutteligt at beviset for CO2 teorien for ham grundlæggende hviler på at man ud fra to andre teorier, stadig under udvikling ikke kan forklare klimaets udvikling så kan vi andre more os lidt over en veloplagt Glenn Beck der ikke frygter at “We all going to drown in a fiery flood!”

0 Kommentarer »

Ingen kommentarer endnu.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Kommentér indlægget...

Monokultur kører på WordPress