Det muslimske sind

Jeg har undgået at høre de sædvanlige forklaringer på, hvorfor unge mænd (muslimer) fra Vesten drages af ekstremisme (islam) og kan finde på at drage i hellig krig (jihad) i Syrien og Irak. Det afhænger ikke af sociale eller uddannelsesmæssige forhold, ej heller af niveauet af muslimskhed i opvæksten. Det handler blot om at være muslim og kæmpe for islam, som man kan læse ud af en rimeligt serøs artikel (fra fremtiden) i Economist

Western fighters often seem to jump at the chance to take part in a fight or help build a new Islamic state. The Soufan Group, a New York-based intelligence outfit, reckons that by the end of May as many as 12,000 fighters from 81 nations had joined the fray, among them some 3,000 from the West (see chart). The number today is likely to be a lot higher. Since IS declared a caliphate on June 29th, recruitment has surged. Syria has drawn in fighters faster than in any past conflict, including the Afghan war in the 1980s or Iraq after the Americans invaded in 2003.

The beheading on or around August 19th of James Foley, an American journalist, by a hooded fighter with a London accent, has put a spotlight on Britain. In the 1990s London was a refuge for many extremists, including many Muslim ones. Radical preachers were free to spout hate. Britain remains in many ways the centre of gravity for European jihadist networks, says Thomas Hegghammer of the Norwegian Defence Research Establishment. “The radical community in Britain is still exporting ideas and methods.”

While the overwhelming majority of foreign fighters in Syria are Arabs, Britons make up one of the biggest groups of Western fighters. But Belgians, Danes and others have a higher rate per person (see left-hand chart above). France, which has tighter laws against extremism, has also seen more of its citizens go off to wage jihad.


IS is not the only group Westerners join, but it is the most appealing thanks to its global outlook, which includes spreading the caliphate across the world, to its attempts to implement immediate sharia law—and to the glow of its military success.


Those who talked of defending Syrians now deny that the land belongs to the locals, says Shiraz Maher of ICSR. “Bilad al-Sham”, or Greater Syria, has a special status in Islam because it appears in end-of-time prophecies. It belongs to Allah, fighters declare. But what if Syrians do not want Islamic law? “It’s not up to them, because it’s for Islam to implement Islamic rule,” says the European fighter who says he left his home country because it was not Islamic enough. He says he wants to “educate rather than behead Syrians”.


Most of IS’s ideas and all of its gorier methods are rejected by most Muslims, who see the group simply as criminal. But it does draw on Islamic theology, arguing—for instance—that non-Muslims should pay jizya, a special tax.

Hvad muslimer tænker (eller, hvad journalisten ønsker de tænker) er som sagt uden betydning: “It’s not up to them, because it’s for Islam to implement Islamic rule”.

Many say they feel more comfortable in a country where the way of life is Islamic—even if not yet Islamic enough—and have no plans to leave or carry out attacks elsewhere. “I am much happier here—got peace of mind,” says the European fighter.

But others who have gone to Syria to battle against Mr Assad have become disillusioned, says Mr Neumann. They worry about infighting and about killing other Muslims. “This is not what we came for,” they tell him.

Der er selvfølgelig variationer i antallet af muslimer fra forskellige lande og retninger og etniciteter som der også er det i bevæggrundende. Og det er hvad der er tale om, variationer, som der altid vil være når der er tale om mennesker. Men variationerne er over et tema, islam, og trenden er klar. Det er en folkelig bevægelse. Man har råbt ad fontes og uagtet hvad en spinkelt flertal måtte mene er almindelig fornuft, som Vesten har inspireret til så er islam islam og man må tage hele pakken - det er ikke op til en selv.

Men variationerne vil være halmstrå til allehånde bortforklaringer om at det intet har med islam at gøre (som jeg lige hørte David Cameron gentage i TV - forstår politikerne vitterligt ikke at de udhuler deres påstand når de tvinges til at slå den fast igen og igen og igen?), at vi har en ansvar og derfor også evnen til at ændre, hvad der ikke behøver at være sådan. Det er ikke monstre, der tager kravet om jihad alvorligt, det er almindelige mennesker, der er muslimer. Som regnvejr reducerer antallet af demonstranter, således betyder faciliteterne også noget for, hvilke kampe man vælger at tage

But junk food is in ample supply, tweets a Swedish fighter, more happily. And there is a lot of time, sometimes days on end, for “chilling”, says the European fighter on Kik, a smartphone messaging app. That is when he makes “a normal-life day: washing clothes, cleaning the house, training, buying stuff”. Thanks to satellite internet connections, the continuing flow of goods into the country and the relatively decent level of development compared with elsewhere in the region, Syria is a long way from the hardship of Afghanistan’s mountains. Last year, to attract others to come, jihadists tweeted pictures with the hashtag “FiveStarJihad”.

Kedsomhed nævnes også som en del af forklaringen, men det kan kun påvirke variationen (hvorfor keder muslimer sig så ekstremt?)

More plausible explanations are the desire to escape the ennui of home and to find an identity. “Some individuals are drawn out there because there is not a lot going on in their own lives,” says Raffaello Pantucci, an analyst at the Royal United Services Institute, a London think-tank. Images of combatants playing snooker, eating sweets and splashing in swimming pools have sometimes suggested that jihad was not unlike a student holiday, without the booze. For young men working in dead-end jobs in drab towns, the brotherhood, glory and guns seem thrilling. Many of Belgium’s fighters come from the dullest of cities, where radicals have concentrated their efforts to get recruits.

I sidste uge kunne man i Telegraph læse lidt nærmere om det sørgelige muslimske sind.

Choudhury, 31, who once ran a Muslim youth group, has been accused of being the ringleader, blamed for recruiting his friends. Others suggest he was simply a willing volunteer, a married father with two children, aged five and two, who was disaffected with life in Britain and desperate for a change of scene.

He had worked for an insurance company and then his local council as a racial awareness officer. But he was also a con artist, who had tricked his own family out of tens of thousands of pounds.

In 2010, he conned them out of £25,000, under the false pretence of needing treatment for cancer, to go to Singapore, not once but twice for surgery.

Once there, Choudhury, who was in perfect health, spent the money on prostitutes costing £200 a night, his penchant for young women revealed in text messages discovered by police.

Back in Portsmouth, he resumed the habit. He went on what he called “lads’ holidays” to Morocco three times and twice more to Singapore in 2011 and 2012, while at the same time downloading lectures by extremist preachers, extolling the virtues of an Islamic caliphate. To atone for his sins, Choudhury decided to embark on a holy war.


Jaman, a former worker in a Sky customer service call centre, whose parents owned an Indian takeaway restaurant in Portsmouth. He had studied at an Islamic boarding school in London, but life in a call centre proved boring and un-demanding. In May last year, he went to Syria and began recruiting his eager friends. In messages posted on Twitter and other internet sites, he painted a romanticised version of life on the front line, boasting of a “five star jihad”.

A month before he went, Choudhury asked Jaman what kind of gun he could buy for £50. “I had a hand gun but it’s not a great one. I bought it [for] $30,” replied Jaman in messages seized by British police while building up their case against Choudhury.


Once the men landed in Turkey, they were met by an intermediary who took them overland to the Syrian border. From there, they crossed the border easily and were driven straight to an abandoned hospital in Aleppo, Syria’s second largest city, and scene of ferocious fighting.

“You could tell it was an abandoned building with broken pipes and wires,” Choudhury said at his trial at Kingston Crown Court. “No one spoke English. We had a meal of pasta and whilst eating, the table was shaking from the shelling.”

He said he was made to do the cooking and washing and look after children in a makeshift nursery. He had gone with grand ambitions.

In a series of tweets on September 16 and 17 last year, he wrote: “Leaving wife & kids behind for Jihad… All my life I strived to be something, someone, but isn’t being a Muslim something, someone. Isn’t being a Muslim the best thing ever?… The life of this world is nothing but a sweet poison that quenches the thirst of desire and drags the ungrateful soul deeper into Hell!” But in Syria he had become quickly disaffected.

Triste skæbner, nogle dør, andre kan ikke klare og nogle bliver sat til at skure lokummer. Og så vil man hellere bruge 2000 kroner på en luder men kun 500 kroner på et våben når man skal i krig. Men kedsomhed? Kone og børn og et produktivt liv tilfredsstiller ikke muslimen? Hvorfor?

Drømmen om jihad er depraveret ifølge Firatnews, der har set en dokumentar med det passende navn “Gang of Degenerates” (der skal tages forbehold for sandhedsværdien af det følgende, men måske er det historier om hvad man hygger sig med på en sådan “jihad student holiday” der drager?)

Attention was drawn in the documentary to the fact ISIS’s most effective weapon is its ability to create fear and terror by means of its methods, such as random killings regardless of gender, age, religion or ethnicity, its decapitations, rapes and burying people alive. The gangs do not feel a need to conceal what they have perpetrated, on the contrary they publish their atrocities so that more people can see them.


The most lurid part of the documentary was the part in which gang members gave their ‘marriage’ numbers in addition to their names and ISIS membership numbers. For instance, Cinêd Cemîl Silêman said his membership number was 333, while his marriage number was 583.

Mihemed Sebah Hebe? said his membership number was 500, and his marriage number was 400.

The ISIS members admitted that what they called ‘marriage’ was in fact rape. They said that every new member of the organisation was raped. The footage of the rape would be used as blackmail in the event of the new recruit refusing to participate in actions.

20-year-old Ferhan Salim Unûf Safên said he had been abducted by Silêman Kohnê, Ebû Qûteybe and Cinêd Cemîl and suffered multiple rapes. “I fainted. When I came round they told me: ‘you are now with ISIS in Jazaa.’ They told me to join. I said it was not possible. They did terrible thiungs to me. Things even the Americans didn’t do in Abu Graib. Things even the Israelis haven’t done to the Palestinians. I’m ashamed to explain them. There were 6 or 7 of them. Their faces were covered. They ‘married me’ about ten times!”

Ebdulkerîm Îbrahîm Bazo said ‘marriage’ was a rule in order to be a member of the organisation. Bazo said the ‘wedding’ was carried out like a ceremony, adding: “those who did it to me said I had gained morale and strength to fight.”


Bazo added that the footage recorded was used as blackmail. He said: “Silêman Kohnê took me to a village, where my ‘marriage’ was performed by Hecî Newaf Mele Mehmûd. They blindfolded me and carried out the wedding. About a fortnight later they came and said I had to participate in the organisation. I didn’t want to. But they had the footage. They threatened to show it to my family.”

Ehmed Hisên explained horrifying incidents; “I’m from the Sharbaniyan tribe in Malikiyê (Derik). Silêman Kohnê proposed that I join ISIS some time ago. But I told him I was newly married and did not want to be involved in such things. I was then abducted and drugged. When I came to I was in a room which stank terribly. They wouldn’t let me leave the room. Five people came in and told me I should join the organisation, I refused. Then they tortured me. They extinguished cigarettes on my body. Such things were not done to Iraqis at Guantanamo. You would think I was an infidel. They blindfolded and stripped me. They ‘married’ me 15 times. Then they washed my head and put cologne on me. They told me no one could join ISIS without being married. Then they recited very strange verses of the Quran. As they spoke I imagined images of severed heads. They spoke academic Arabic.”

Måske optræder serierøvpuling ikke ved ISIS jobsamtaler, men groteskheder er der nok af

Venstrefløjen plaget af uerkendt indsigt

Dansk Folkepartis Søren Espersen mener ifølge Information at “Det var en fejl at invadere Irak og styrte landets diktator, Saddam Hussein”

»Saddam Hussein er i forhold til det her langt at foretrække. Men det er altid et spørgsmål om, at mellem to onder vælger man det mindste. Det er ikke, fordi jeg holder af Saddam Hussein. Men det er så langt at foretrække, at han sad i Baghdad i dag end de andre,« siger Dansk Folkepartis udenrigsordfører, som tidligere også har fortrudt til sin støtte til interventionen i Libyen.

Højrefløjen må leve med at de nok foretog et konkret fejlskøn da de væltede Saddam og troede at de kunne hjælpe arabiske muslimer ind i demokratiets lyksaligheder. Det var en konkret fejl i en konkret situation. Men for venstrefløjen tegner der sig en erkendelse der kan true deres verdensbillede. Om man skulle have invaderet Irak eller ej så er de neokonservatives optimistiske eksperiment for alle til skue. Nogle kulturer er blot ikke til at redde. Nogle kulturer vil ikke det bedste for dem selv eller for deres børn - og derfor vil de heller ikke os noget godt. Nogle kulturer kan kun håbe på en brutal tyran der kan holde de folkelige grusonheder i ave.

»Jeg kan ikke følge Espersen i, at valget står mellem diktatorer eller kaos. Den præmis accepterer jeg ikke. Når jeg for eksempel kigger på Tunesien – og andre lande som har været gennem en demokratisk proces – så er det rigtigt, at det aldrig er nogen enkel proces. Nogle steder er der kaotiske tilstande. Men det er jo ikke, fordi de lande er begyndt at forfølge demokratiske drømme og mål. Det skyldes, at der er meget, meget stærke kræfter – som vil være der under alle omstændigheder – der er interesseret i at fremme interne modsætninger mellem shia- og sunnimuslimer,« siger Martin Lidegaard.

En anden af de daværende krigsmodstandere, SF’s daværende formand og nuværende forsvarsordfører, Holger K. Nielsen, er enig:

»Selv om Irak-krigen har været en katastrofe, så anerkender jeg ikke Søren Espersens præmis: Det var måden, man fjernede Saddam Hussein på, som vi var imod. Hvis USA i stedet havde brugt lige så mange penge på at støtte oppositionen til Saddam Hussein, som på krigen, kunne resultatet være blevet et andet.«

Men ak for d’herrer Lidegaard og Nielsen, det var ikke amerikanernes håndtering eller tonen i debatten, der fik Irak til at gå i opløsning, det var irakkerne selv. Nu, uden en tyran, overladt til sig selv og deres manglende evne til empati og selvkontrol, forfalder de til deres kulturelle og religiøse balast og slagter lystigt løs på hinanden.

Og denne frustration gentager sig i kommentarerne, der i sin særlige blanding af amerikanerhad, anti-kapitalisme, antisemitisme og konspirationsteorier fremtvinger indsigter, som endnu har til gode at blive taget alvorligt. En Carsten Hansen siger det resigneret ligeud

Kan det konstateres at repræsentanter fra den yderste venstrefløj er ganske enige med DF i denne sag.

At Mellemøstlige befolkninger er bedre tjent med at leve i diktaturer ?

Ja, det er den sørgelige sandhed. Frø af ugræs skal slås og holdes nede, som Brian Larsen tørt konstaterer ”Ja, Irak var langt bedre tjent med Saddam. Godt han kan indrømme det.” Carsten Hansen kommer dog igen med en nuancering

Men er det sandheden, at befolkningerne ikke ønsker demokrati ?
Eller er det ikke nærmere store mindretal blandt befolkningerne der er tilpas voldelige og sekteriske nok til, at de ikke ønsker at dele magten ?.
Mon ikke langt de de fleste almindelige mennesker ønsker fred og frihed ?

Her rammer Hansen noget centralt. Irak har haft høje stemmeprocenter og de første valg blev afholdt med stor succes trods trusler fra jihadister og gamle Saddam loyalister. Men det ændrer ikke ved regnestykket. Den muslimske og arabiske kultur fremmer ikke kollektiv mindelighed og tøjler ikke den mørkeste grusomhed. Dens ære-skam dynamik gør det til den største kæps rige, hvor brutalitet er det eneste argument der kan ræsonnere. En sørgelig præmis, men det er sandheden uagtet, hvad Lidegaard og Nielsen vil anderkende og acceptere. En anden kommenterer

Fejlen var at invasionen var “ulovlig”, og at man for at tilgodese Tyrkiets undertrykkelse af kurderne ikke opdelte Irak i 3 dele.

Ulovlig i citationstegn? Åbenbart, ja endda selvfølgelig, er succes monokulturel og fiasko multikulturel. Også Kjeld Hansen har et skarpt blik for kulturens betydning for et samfunds succes

For en gangsskyld vil jeg give DF ret. Hele mellemøsten har andre traditioner og værdier, samt en anden kulturel baggrund end det demokratiske vesten. Man gør ikke et land demokratisk ved at fjerne en diktator. Det er en proces, som kan tage mange årtier.

- Og hvem siger resten af verden absolut vil leve som i USA og Europa?

I øvrigt, så har en supermagt som USA kun forsøgt, at ubrede demokrati med uset militær magt i egen interesse. Ikke for at gøre noget godt for landets befolkning. Og hver gang USA er gået i krig for frihedens skyld som det hedder, har det altid været mod mindre velbeslåede lande med et svagt og delvis forsvarsløst militært.

Jeg tog det sidste afsnit med fordi det er så morsomt når folk ikke ved, hvad de selv skriver. Hvilke lande kunne USA gå i krig med, der ikke var dem økonomisk og militært underlegne? Espen Bøghs logik bliver også svigtet af hans indgroede fjendebilleder i denne Mabuselignende rablen

Diktatorer sidder oftest kun så længe de lever, og kommer der en ny diktator, - “der om man så må sige samler landet igen”.

Saddam Husseins søn/sønner kunne selvfølgelig efterfølge ham, men sjældent går det godt ret længe, da kun få accepterer dette i inderkredsen eller udefra.

Nordkorea er nærmet undtagelsen der bekræfter reglen, men lykkeligt er det næppe, selvom der hersker nærmest gude- eller kultstatus omkring lederen, - som reelt selv er fange af fortiden u nutiden.

Så efter en diktator kommer blot en ny diktator, hvilket Amerika burde have lært fra Iran, hvor de for øvrigt engang tidligere valgte at fjerne en demokratisk valgt præsident, og indsætte Shahen af Persien, Mohammed Reza Palevi, som var amerikansk marionet, der med sit tyranniske hemmelige politi, SAVAK, knægtede enhver form for demokratisk tale eller det der blot lignede.

Den demokratisk valgte præsident, havde nok været bedre i demokratisk henseende end for Irak, men den historie fik vi aldrig grundet Amerikansk undergravende indblanding dengang.

Med Shahen ude af billedet, kom ayatollah Khomeini tilbage fra Frankrig, som have lagt hus til denne religiøse fanatiker, hvilket adskillige vestlige lande som regel plejer at gøre.

Anders Fogh Rasmussens udtalelser er på randen af vanvid, og demonstrerer helt klart, at manden ikke selv mener eller tror han kan tage fejl, og derfor gemmer sig bagved, at give skylden for det kaos der nu er til Irakerne selv, ved at frikende den Amerikanske indsats.

Imidlertid er der kaos i Irak skabt netop af den Amerikanske intervention, og den måde Amerikanerne har håndteret situationen på igennem hele perioden, og samtidig brugt uanede summer af dollars på falsk loyalitet til de forkerte.

Saddam Hussein, Moammar Gadaffi og deres lige var ikke engle på jorden, og skal ikke forsvares i den anledning eller på nogen måde, men tilstanden var dog stabil, og vist var det hemmelige politi og dets metoder ækle, men det blev jo ikke nævneværdigt bedre med al Maliki og hans slæng.

I dag er der så kaos i Irak, Libyen, Afghanistan m.m. som vesten har ansvaret for efter deres afprøvning af de seneste og mest moderne våben, så vesten kunne demonstrere sin overlegne våbenmagt og strategier for krigsførelse, - og Ih hvor er vi dog imponeret af os selv her bagefter, men vi er også samtidig uskyldige, for vi ville jo det gode!

Også Kurt Loftkjær lufter sin uerkendte indsigt når han postulerer at…

….demokrati ikke indføres med indsatstyrker og anden tvang. Det kræver hårdt arbejde og velvilje.

Det er meget optimistisk at tro, at Vesten kan rykke ind i Mellemøsten med de grænser, som opstod på baggrund af europæiske koloniherres opdeling af området for egen vindings skyld og uden hensyn til områdets stammefolk og religioner. Et område som kun få fra den vestlige kultur forstår eller har forsøgt at forstå.

Jeg hørte efter 1. Golfkrig en irakisk kvinde udtrykke betænkelighed over tanken om at fjerne Saddam Hussein. Efter hendes opfattelse havde han på flere områder sikret kvinder et bedre liv, end de ville kunne opnå i andre dele af Mellemøsten.

Igen; Velvilje har de lokale ikke; anklagen mod grænser der ikke tager hensyn til folkeslag og religioner er en anklage mod det multietniske/kulturelle/religiøse og resultet er at kun vold ved Saddam kunne sikre kvinderne en tålelig tilværelse. Det samme når Bob Jensen frem til før sin kulturelt selvhadende tirade

sadam hussein gav kvinder lige rettigheder med mænd, lavede et fremragende undervisnings - og sundhedssystem. han byggese et sekulært samfund i stedet for et bygget på religiøs fundamentalisme. selv om han heller ikke forbød religion. Han var en brutal diktator, fordi han vidste, at kun eh hård hånd kunne holde de modstridende religøse faktioner i ave, som landet havde med at gøre som resultat af de europæiske stormagters ignorante opdeling af mellemøsten omkring første verdenskrig.
Det er helt bestemt aldrig godt med en diktator. men det er såmænd heller ikke så skidegodt med en neoliberal regering, som skider hul i den brede befolknings behov og ønsker…

Og der stopper vi så før idiosynkrasierne løber løbsk. Saddam stod i modsætning til den folkelige kultur, i modsætning til multikulturen og islam (selvfølgelig kaldet religiøs fundamentalisme) og dette kunne kun holdes i ave ved vold. Så Espersen indrømmer en fejl, men den fejl har har revet afsløret venstrefløjens illusoriske verdensbillede og efterladt den forpint af sine kognitive dissonanser.

Tøjfirma med uheldigt design

Antisemitisme — Drokles on August 28, 2014 at 7:32 pm

Haaretz skriver at det spanske tøjfirma Zara var lidt uheldige med designet af en sherifstjerne på en stribet børnetrøje. Ligheden til en nazi kz-uniform er for slående.


Og det er ikke første gang Zara har været uheldige. I 2007 skrev Daily Mail at en taske med swastika symboler blev trukket tilbage


Muslimsk klangbund

Arabere, Arabiske forår, Diverse, Irak, Jihad, Kalifatet, Kristenforfølgelse, Muslimer, Syrien, Terror, islam — Drokles on August 26, 2014 at 3:03 pm

Daniel Greenfield skriver så rigtigt at det der er galt med ISIS er det der er galt med islam.

Wahhabi armies have been attacking Iraq in order to wipe out Shiites for over two hundred years. One of the more notably brutal attacks took place during the administration of President Thomas Jefferson.

That same year the Marine Corps saw action against the Barbary Pirates and West Point opened, but even Noam Chomsky, Michael Moore and Howard Zinn chiming via Ouija board would have trouble blaming the Wahhabi assault on the Iraqi city of Kerbala in 1802 on the United States or an oil pipeline.


The media finds it convenient to depict the rise of newly extremist groups being radicalized by American foreign policy, Israeli blockades or Danish cartoons. A closer look however shows us that these groups did not become radicalized, rather they increased their capabilities.

ISIS understood from the very beginning that targeting Shiites and later Kurds would give it more appeal to Sunni Arabs inside Iraq and around the Persian Gulf. Bin Laden tried to rally Muslims by attacking America. ISIS has rallied Muslims by killing Shiites, Kurds, Christians and anyone else it can find.

Every news report insists that ISIS is an extreme outlier, but if that were really true then it would not have been able to conquer sizable chunks of Iraq and Syria. ISIS became huge and powerful because its ideology drew the most fighters and the most financial support. ISIS is powerful because it’s popular.ISIS has become more popular and more powerful than Al Qaeda because Muslims hate other Muslims even more than they hate America. Media reports treat ISIS as an outside force that inexplicably rolls across Iraq and terrorizes everyone in its path. In reality, it’s the public face of a Sunni coalition. When ISIS massacres Yazidis, it’s not just following an ideology; it’s giving Sunni Arabs what they want.Jamal Jamir, a surviving Yazidi, told CNN that his Arab neighbors had joined in the killing.

I stedet for at citere Jamal Jamir i CNN, så er her en tilsvarende historie fra Sabah Hajji Hassan på Yahoo News om at islam er, hvor der er muslimer

Yazidis fleeing a jihadist onslaught in northern Iraq say neighbours took up arms alongside their attackers, informing on members of the religious minority and helping the militants take over.

“The (non-Iraqi) jihadists were Afghans, Bosnians, Arabs and even Americans and British fighters,” said Sabah Hajji Hassan, a 68-year-old Yazidi who managed to flee the bloody offensive by the Islamic State (IS) jihadist group.

“But the worst killings came from the people living among us, our (Sunni) Muslim neighbours.”

“The Metwet, Khawata and Kejala tribes — they were all our neighbours. But they joined the IS, took heavy weapons from them, and informed on who was Yazidi and who was not. Our neighbours made the IS takeover possible,” the distraught white-bearded Hassan said.

Og de kristnes erfaringer er de samme

Dokumentar - Meeting ISIL

Press TV er en iransk TV station, så man skal se ‘dokumentaren’ med øje for propaganda interesser. Dog er det alligevel et kig bag facaden

To learn who these people are, what they are fighting for, and who funds them, PRESS TV goes deep into their camps and brings you face to face interviews and exclusive footage. Many of those who were initially infatuated by the group’s promise of justice seem to be horrified and utterly disillusioned today.

Everyone who is not us is the enemy and should be branded as infidel. This seems to be the prevailing ideology of the extreme Takfiri terrorists known as the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL). Their aim is said to be the establishment of an Islamic Caliphate. Shias, Christians, Sunnis, Yazidies, and whomsoever who dares to question them or raise his voice of dissent are persecuted under their highly distorted version of Islamic Sharia. Gruesome be-headings, crucifixions and mass executions are openly carried out under their iconic black flag which is more like a modern day equivalent of a Jolly Roger. At times, it seems like their victims are whoever who is unlucky enough to be in their path during their killing sprees. And yet they know how to manipulate social media and have succeeded in brainwashing some to join them in their “fight for justice”.

Barneleg på muslimsk

Arabere, Arabiske forår, Hamas, Israel, Jihad, Kalifatet, Kristenforfølgelse, Muslimer, Terror, islam — Drokles on August 26, 2014 at 7:16 am

Via Snaphanen

Clarion Project har fundet et andet eksempel


I Gaza leger man terrortunnel

Et andet sted (muligvis Pakistan ifølge indehaveren af denne Youtubekanal, men det kunne vel være i Odense såvel som i Raqqa) leger man en fremmed er en der vil myrde en godtroende kuffar

Der er lagt i kakkelovnen til os kuffar de næste par generationer.

En chokerende rejse - Hanna Ziadeh og det arabiske efterår

Arabere, Arabiske forår, Diverse, Kristenforfølgelse, Muslimer, Sharia, Syrien, Terror, Tyrkiet, islam — Drokles on August 24, 2014 at 8:33 am

Jeg beskrev denne glimrende dokumentar sidste år og havde et par kommentarer til nogle meget sigende billeder, som Ziadehs fotograf fangede. Men jeg havde ikke mulighed for at vise filmen før nu

Israel er islams banesår

Arabere, Diverse, Hamas, Historie, Iran, Israel, Jihad, Muslimer, Sharia, Terror, UNWRA, islam — Drokles on August 22, 2014 at 3:01 am

Har De nogensinde tænkt, hvorfor Israel fylder så meget i det muslimske og muslimsk-arabiske sind? Hvorfor der altid er mindst en større terrororganisation, med det eneste formål at udslette Israel og som nyder bredt sympati. Hvorfor muslimske ledere altid kan bortlede folkets utilfredshed med tale om Israel snarlige udslettelse? Og hvis de slutter fred, hvorfor de straks søges myrdet? Hvorfor tilsyneladende sekulære muslimske akademikere kan bebrejde Israels eksistens for den arabiske og muslimske verdens sørgelige tilstand? Hvorfor der aldrig er en fredsløsning som er realistisk? Ja, hvor araberne altid ender med at forkaste alle delingsforslag? Hvorfor de palæstinensiske arabere vedbliver med at være flygtninge  i flere genrationer (havde UNWRA styret Danmark ville Brødrene Price bo i det asylcenter, hvor de var vokset op). Hvad det betyder når Hamas leder Khaled Mash’al i 2006 i en moske i Damaskus sagde ”Før end Israel dør må det ydmyges!”?

Richard Landes skriver i Tablet Magazine fremragende om hvorledes muslimske araberes ære og skam begreber har fanget dem i en ‘følelsesmæssig katastrofe’

In order to understand the role of hard zero-sum, honor-shame concerns in the attitude of Arabs toward Israel, one must first understand the role of the Jew in the Muslim Arab honor-group. For the 13 centuries before Zionism, Jews had been subject to a political status in Muslim lands specifically designed around issues of honor (to Muslims) and shame (to Jews). Jews were dhimmi, “protected” from Muslim violence by their acceptance of daily public degradation and legal inferiority. Noted Chateaubriand in the 19th century: “Special target of all [Muslim and Christian] contempt, the Jews lower their heads without complaint; they suffer all insults without demanding justice; they let themselves be crushed by blows. … Penetrate the dwellings of these people, you will find them in frightful poverty.”

For more than a millennium, Arab and Muslim honor resided, among other places, in their domination and humiliation of their dhimmi—and when the occasional reformer equalized their legal status, he struck a heavy blow to Muslim honor. Noted a British envoy on the impact of Muhammad Ali’s reforms: “The Mussulmans … deeply deplore the loss of that sort of superiority which they all & individually exercised over & against the other sects. … A Mussulman … believes and maintains that a Christian—& still more a Jew—is an inferior being to himself.”

To say that to the honor-driven Arab and Muslim political player, in the 20th century as in the 10th century, the very prospect of an autonomous Jewish political entity is a blasphemy against Islam, and an insult to Arab virility, is not to say that every period of Muslim rule involved deliberate humiliation of dhimmi. Nor is it to say that all Arabs think like this. On the contrary, this kind of testosterone-fueled, authoritarian discourse imposes its interpretation of “honor” on the entire community, often violently. Thus, while some Arabs in 1948 Palestine may have viewed the prospect of Jewish sovereignty as a valuable opportunity, the Arab leadership and “street” agreed that for the sake of Arab honor Israel must be destroyed and that those who disagreed were traitors to the Arab cause.

Worse: The threat to Arab honor did not come from a worthy foe, like the Western Christians, but by from Jews, traditionally the most passive, abject, cowardly of the populations over which Muslims ruled. As the Athenians explained to the Melians in the 5th century B.C.E.:

One is not so much frightened of being conquered by a power which rules over others, as Sparta does, as of what would happen if a ruling power is attacked and defeated by its own subjects.

So, the prospect of an independent state of should-be dhimmis struck Arab leaders as more than humiliating. It endangered all Islam. Thus Rahman Azzam Pasha, the head of the newly formed Arab League, spoke for his “honor group” when he threatened that “if the Zionists dare establish a state, the massacres we would unleash would dwarf anything which Genghis Khan and Hitler perpetrated.” As the Armenians had discovered a generation earlier, the mere suspicion of rebellion could engender massacres.

The loss in 1948, therefore, constituted the most catastrophic possible outcome for this honor-group: Seven Arab armies, representing the honor of hundreds of thousands of Arabs (and Muslims), were defeated by less than a million Jews, the surviving remnant of the most devastating and efficient genocide in history. To fall to people so low on the scale that it is dishonorable even to fight them—nothing could be more devastating. And this humiliating event occurred on center stage of the new postwar global community, before whom the Arab league representatives had openly bragged about their upcoming slaughters. In the history of a global public, never has any single and so huge a group suffered so much dishonor and shame in the eyes of so great an audience.

So, alongside the nakba (catastrophe) that struck hundreds of thousands of the Arab inhabitants of the former British Mandate Palestine, we find yet another, much greater psychological catastrophe that struck the entire Arab world and especially its leaders: a humiliation so immense that Arab political culture and discourse could not absorb it. Initially, the refugees used the term nakba to reproach the Arab leaders who started and lost the war that so hurt them. In a culture less obsessed by honor and more open to self-criticism, this might have led to the replacement of political elites with leaders more inclined to move ahead with positive-sum games of the global politics of the United Nations and the Marshall Plan. But when appearances matter above all, any public criticism shames the nation, the people, and the leaders.

Instead, in a state of intense humiliation and impotence on the world stage, the Arab leadership chose denial—the Jews did not, could not, have not won. The war was not—could never—be over until victory. If the refugees from this Zionist aggression disappeared, absorbed by their brethren in the lands to which they fled, this would acknowledge the intolerable: that Israel had won. And so, driven by rage and denial, the Arab honor group redoubled the catastrophe of its own refugees: They made them suffer in camps, frozen in time at the moment of the humiliation, waiting and fighting to reverse that Zionist victory that could not be acknowledged. The continued suffering of these sacrificial victims on the altar of Arab pride called out to the Arab world for vengeance against the Jews. In the meantime, wherever Muslims held power, they drove their Jews out as a preliminary act of revenge.

The Arab leadership’s interpretation of honor had them responding to the loss of their own hard zero-sum game—we’re going to massacre them—by adopting a negative-sum strategy. Damaging the Israeli “other” became paramount, no matter how much that effort might hurt Arabs, especially Palestinians. “No recognition, no negotiations, no peace.” No Israel. Sooner leave millions of Muslims under Jewish rule than negotiate a solution. Sooner die than live humiliated. Sooner commit suicide to kill Jews than make peace with them.

Læs den hele, det er en af de bedste artikler om, hvad der kaldes Israel-Palæstina konflikten. Og fordi Israels triumferende eksistens er så smertelig så kan man jo nyde de 6 herlige dage i Juni 1967

NB: Dokumentaren herover burde også læse Landes Ære-skam analyse. Så vil den bedre forstå, hvorfor Israel stod i vejen for Nassers pan-arabisme, hvorfor Syrien havde en hær kun opsat på at udrydde Israel og hvorfor den arabiske verden blev traumatiseret af nederlaget. Og den vil forstå, hvorfor de der ville have fred ikke havde en chance.

Venstrefløjen kan ikke genkende en bankerot ideologi

ISIS islamisk sanktionerede slagtning af den amerikanske journalist rummer et opkog af de seneste årtiers møde med islam. Islaem er som islam er, du må tage hele pakken. Men vi i vesten, eller det vil sige de pludrende klasser, bedrager sig selv og en farlig stor del af befolkningen ved at betragte islam som en eksotisk projektion af egen ønsketænkning. Først er der den stakkels journalist, som bedrog sig selv da han drog afsted for at formidle en større forståelse for islam og ISIS bevæggrunde. Frontpage Magazine afstod fra at tale pænt om de døde og gennemgik Foleys tweets

Foley came to Syria to support the Sunni Islamist rebels against the Syrian government. He was a vehement advocate and while he didn’t necessarily side with any single group, he echoed the one sided narrative rather than telling the truth about the Islamists. His Twitter feed was full of urgings to arm the Jihadists.

Meanwhile he sneered at America’s War on Terror.

He cheered on the Sunni Muslim terrorists fighting to ethnically cleanse the Christians of Aleppo. In the conflict between Israel and Hamas, his tweets and retweets were chock full of pro-Sunni Syrian terrorist propaganda.

When Newsweek’s Muslim Rage cover story came out, Foley mocked it too. Raging Muslims. How silly and Islamophobic.

Som om det ikke var nok, så viser det sig (måske) at Foley blev taget til fange af de mennesker vores kære ledere havde knyttet håb og penge til, skriver International Business Times

According to Syrian sources who have worked previously to locate and rescue kidnapped journalists in Syria, American journalist James Foley, who was beheaded by Islamic State in a video the militant group made public on Tuesday, was most likely used by another guerrilla group as a token of allegiance to ISIS.

According to those sources, Foley was in the hands of the Dawood Bridgade, a group that was originally aligned with relatively moderate opposition groups such as the Free Syrian Army, but recently pledged allegiance to ISIS.

The International Business Times reported last month that activists on the ground near Al Bab, Syria, said that the Dawood Brigade, which now consists of about 1,000 people, defected from the Free Syrian Army and moved on to Raqqa to join ISIS. The group arrived in Raqqa, an ISIS stronghold, in a convoy of more than 100 vehicles.

USAs præsident Barak Hussein Obama kunne have sagt noget fornuftigt da han slog fat at “ISIL has no ideology of any value for human beings. Their ideology is bankrupt”, men havde allerede undergravet fornuften med den absurde omend sædvanlige apologi

ISIL speaks for no religion. Their victims are overwhelmingly Muslim. And no faith teaches massacres on innocents. No just god will stand for, what they did yesterday and what they do every single day.

Muslimer og kun muslimer over hele verden strømmer til ISIS med de samme korancitater med tilskyndende råb fra ummaen - men skam få den der kunne tænke at det havde noget med islam at gøre. David Trads gjorde på sin Facebook profil i vanlig perfid stil Fathi El-Abeds vanvid rangen stridig ved at give Hamas åndsfæller ISIS syndsforladelse og pege på

Billedet til venstre er fra Islamisk Stats henrettelse af en amerikansk journalist. Billedet til højre er fra USAs ydmygelser af muslimske fanger i Abu Ghraib. Begge fotos illustrerer grove krænkelser af individer.

Modbydelig opførsel avler endnu flere modbydeligheder - og vi burde tænke over, om vores stiltiende accept af Vestens krigsovergreb mod muslimer i de forløbne mange år står i vejen for for en løsning på vanviddet.

Vi burde i hvert fald ikke bringe os i en situation, hvor vi selv står langt fra de værdier, som vi - med rette - blir forargede over, at andre bryder. Lad os sikre, at vi altid står for det gode eksempel. Aldrig det forkastelige.

Den eneste tvivl, der findes i islam er graden af grusomhed, der er en ret der skal nydes, som en canadisk imam ifølge Tarek Fatah forklarede sine spirituelle tilhørere.

Elefanter i rummet

Diverse — Drokles on August 20, 2014 at 4:42 am

Hver dag konfronteres man med politikere og journalister der taler omkring virkelige problemer uden at nævne dem med et ord. Som den engelske formand for the Liberal Democrats Nick Clegg, der forleden hævdede at man ville ophidse moderate muslimer, hvis man underviste i engelske værdier i skolen. Ikke et ord om at muslimer selv i deres moderate repræsentation i så fald stod i en fjendtlig modsætning til England og dets liberale og nationale værdier. At englænderne ikke kan være englændere i deres eget land. Ja, end ikke en refleksion over hvad islam egentlig er når man har en betegnelse som moderate muslimer.

Måske var det ikke en elefant i rummet da den engelske premierminister David Cameron i sine bizarre lykønskninger til muslimerne som de gik i gang med ramadanen nævnte deres uvurderlige bidrag til friheden, som de gjorde ved i tusindvis at tjene som soldater for det britiske imperium under 1. Verdenskrig. Som bekendt var briterne og de allierede i krig med selveste det muslimske kalifat Osmannerriget. Men det var svært at overse  diskriminationsforsker Mira Skadegaard Thorsens elefant fra en kronik i Politiken. Her harcelerede hun over den strukturelle daglige diskrimination og her er præsentationen af indvandrere særligt vigtig: ”Ind i mellem ses ’solstrålehistorier’ som alene opnår nyhedsværdi, fordi de er med til at bekræfte den gældende negative norm; de fungerer som undtagelser.” Ikke et ord om virkeligheden.

Så meget har man mistet sansen for ordenes betydning at Jyllands-Posten føler det helt logisk i en overskrift at påstå at “Danskere hylder rabiat bevægelse på sociale medier“. Den rabiate bevægelse er den muslimske ISIS, der hæger rundt i Irak og Syrien for tiden. Danskerne er muslimer med dansk pas. ISIS er sunni muslimer og myrder løs på ikke-muslimer for ikke at være muslimer og på shiamuslimer for ikke at være rigtige muslimer. Det er en muslimsk debat der har raset i mere end 1.300 år og nu igen truer den for alvor med at bryde ud i et større opgør. Men mens alle alarmer blinker viderebringer medierne de glade håbe om at “Stormoske i København forener trosretninger” og fremfører imamens ord som var det noget værd

- I vores hellige koran er det nævnt sort på hvidt, at vi skal samarbejde og især med de kristne, som også er bogens folk, også jøder som også er bogens folk, som har hellige skrifter fra Gud. Vi har mange fællesskaber.

Hver gang en journalist hører nogen udtale sig om begrænsede mængder burde spørgsmålet “hvad med resten?” komme som skidt fra en spædekalv. Så mester, hvad med de der ikke er Bogens Folk? Her er vi henvist for vores licenspenge til selv at grave i muslimernes hellige skrifter og kan i koranen læse

Sura 9 (Omvendelse) vers 29: Bekæmp dem, som ikke tror på Allah og den yderste dag, og som ikke forbyder, hvad Allah og Hans udsending forbyder; og blandt dem, der har fået Skriften, skal I bekæmpe dem, der ikke bekender sig til den sande religion, indtil de kuet er rede til at betale skat!


Nogle gange stikker virkeligheden dog hovedet frem så ingen kan undgå at påtale det som da talsmanden for den nye stormoske i København udtalte sig negativt om homoseksuelle. Homoseksuelle er de godes darling for tiden, symbolet på europas frisind og så gør det mindre at moskeen, muslimsk som den er, også går ind for dødsstraf for apostasi. Ej heller påtalte nogle af de gode kvinder kønsopdelingen, hvor kvinderne er henvist til en afskærmet afdeling.

BT fik, hvad de kaldte “en velintegreret pakistaner” til at oversætte en imam ved en anden moske

For øjnene af 500-600 troende muslimer samlet til fredagsbøn i Islamisk Kulturcenter på Horsebakken i København, gik deres åndelige overhoved, imamen Farouk Sultan, amok i en rus af trusler om mord, bål og brand. Målet for imamens religiøse raseri var den herboende redaktør af den dansk-pakistanske avis Lahore, Mohammed Hanif Chaudry fra Søborg. Imam Farouk Sultans besked til Chaudry var klar og tydelig: Chaudry er en “kætter, en forfører og Satan selv”. Bed om tilgivelse eller risikér at blive dræbt og brændt foran forsamlingen. Samtidig opfordrede imamen under bønnen forrige fredag sin menighed til at brænde og boykotte avisen, og for at lægge vægt bag sine ord lod imamen sine ophidsede tilhængere afbrænde eksemplarer af Lahore foran forsamlingen. Det var som scener fra “fatwaen” mod den dødsdømte forfatter Salman Rushdie. To dage senere, sidste søndag, blev de samme dødstrusler udspredt i radioprogrammet, Aap ki Awaz, der sendte en båndoptagelse fra moskeen. Programmet hører under urdu-redaktionen på Radio Storkøbenhavn, der ejes af LO.

Såeh, hvad med menigheden? Hvorledes reagerede de? Og hvad kan man dog tolke, om noget overhovedet, ud af at radioprogrammet Aap ki Awaz sendte en båndoptagelse fra moskeen to dage senere? For det er historien om en imam og ikke historien om den voksende minoritet af muslimer der underminerer vores samfund.

Den historie får man bagvendt når man i Jyllands-Posten kan læse Rune Selsing skrive “Palæstinenserne udgør en stemme i debatten, som er umulig at ignorere” i et ellers forrygende indlæg. Selsings politikenske parafrase fanger ufrivilligt at palæstinenserne, som alle muslimer, ikke er demokrater men stemmer en bloc, på hvad der gavner islams og palæstinensernes sag. Ingen deling efter overbevisning thi islam tåler ingen deling.

Og netop dyrkelsen af palæstinensersagen bringer antisemitismen frem i lyset. Den konservative Rasmus Jarlov proklamnerede en kalotmarch med udgangspunkt i en muslimbelastet del i København efter en journalist iført kalot havde følt sig truet. Medlem af Nørrebro Lokaludvalg  Uzma Ahmed Andresen advarede på sin egen bagvendte måde mod den multietniske kruttønde således ifølge Danmarks Radio

- Jeg frygter, at demonstrationen er en konfliktoptrapning, og at der er nogle enkeltpersoner, der reagerer på den provokation, der ligger i det, og at det kommer til at tegne et billede af, at Nørrebro er et sted, der er i oprør, siger hun.

Efterfølgende var Uzma Ahmed Andresen ifølge Modkraftmeget lettet” “over, at arrangementet forløb uden problemer“. Den 90 år gamle jøde Svend Allan Horwitz mente i Berlingske Tidende ligeledes at en kalot march vil være at “hælde benzin på bålet” samtidig med at han benægter at der nogensinde havde eksisteret et bål, med denne forrygende sætning

“Jeg har aldrig i mit liv oplevet antisemitisme. Heller ikke dengang i 1943, da mine danske landsmænd hjalp mig til Sverige.”

Og som om det ikke var nok, så leverede hr Horwitz endnu et pragteksemplar

Og pludselig, efter vi har brugt så mange år på at få religionen ud af de offentlige rum, bliver en hovedbeklædning gjort til et vigtigt og stort problem

Men ingen kan skyde sig selv i foden som ‘nydanskere’, som man kunne se et forrygende eksempel på i BT

- De siger, de vil have indvandrere i politiet, men jeg tror dem ikke. Hvis det virkelig var tilfældet, måtte de acceptere små ting i straffeattesten, for jeg kender ikke mange indvandrere, som ikke har lavet et eller andet galt på et tidspunkt, siger Rames, der i går blev fyret med 700 andre medarbejdere fra Danish Crown i Grindsted.

Vise ord.

Obama og den muslimske forfatning

Arabere, Forbrydelse og straf, Historie, Jihad, Muslimer, Obama, Terror, islam, muhammed — Drokles on August 15, 2014 at 1:33 pm


Barak Hussein Obama under et billede af Abraham Lincoln, der befriede slaverne, taler for et kønsopdelt publikum i anledning af muslimernes fejring af sejren over de vantro.

Barak Obama udsendte en lykønskning til muslimernes Eid fest, som han mente “celebrates the common values that unite us in our humanity”. Førend han hilste muslimerne med et Allahu Akbar fortsatte Obama med et andet opsigtsvækkende udsagn

In the United States, Eid also reminds us of the many achievements and contributions of Muslim Americans to building the very fabric of our nation and strengthening the core of our democracy.

Den slags vinder Obama 72% af de muslimske vælgere i USA, men det efterlader de fleste andre med et mysterium: Givet USAs historie, hvad kan Obama dog mene? Eksperterne er uenige. Præsident for Den Katolske Liga Dr. Bill Donohue, mener at Hussein tager helt fejl, som han fortalte Conservative Tribune

“Muslims contributed nothing to the foundation of our country. It was mostly not Catholics or Jews, but who were protestant, were white, were male and, as far as I can tell, were heterosexual! Does that mean everyone else is excluded? No, it does not. And it doesn’t mean everyone else is a bad person. But to lie and say that Muslims were the ones who helped found this country- start naming them; start enumerating them. How did we all miss that in history? See, this kind of patronizing thing is a disgrace. [Obama] doesn’t want to be associated with the fact that it was Christians and the Judeo-Christian ethos that contributed to liberty in this country.”

Robert Spencer kommer derimod sin præsident til hjælp og nævner 5 muslimske bidrag til selve materien af USA: En svækket økonomi, Homeland Security, slavehandel, marinesoldater

og så selve opdagelsen af Amerika(erne)

This one predates the United States as a nation, but without it, the United States would not exist. Every schoolchild knows, or used to know, that in 1492 Christopher Columbus sailed the ocean blue and discovered America while searching for a new, westward sea route to Asia. But why was he searching for a new route to Asia? Because the fall of Constantinople to the Muslims in 1453 closed the trade routes to the East. This was devastating for European tradesmen, who had until then traveled to Asia for spices and other goods by land. Columbus’s voyage was trying to ease the plight of these merchants by bypassing the Muslims altogether and making it possible for Europeans to reach India by sea.

Så tak Allah for USA.

19.999.995 flere huller og så er det hele slut!

Diverse, IPCC, Klima, Pressen, Videnskab — Drokles on August 15, 2014 at 12:16 pm

Jyllands-Posten indleder en artikel om den kommende dommedag med “Det er ikke bare gas, men en alvorlig sag, lyder advarslen fra flere klimaforskere” lige under overskriften “Sibiriske kratere er “Jorden der prutter”

Flere og flere forskere er nu enige om, at de store huller, hvoraf det største vurderes til at være mellem 60 og 70 meter i diameter, er dannet, fordi permafrosten i undergrunden er smeltet. Når permafrosten smelter, udløser den de gasser, der også har været frosset ned i undergrunden. Naturgasserne udløser derpå deres energi op gennem jordskorpen i eksplosioner, der skaber “huller” i overfladen.


Mellem sin fortsatte tale om prutter, citerer artiklen alarmerede forskere: “Environmental Defense Fund kalder undergrunden i Arktis for “en tidsindstillet bombe” for vores klima” og det er “endnu mere alarmerende end asteroidenedslag“. Men skønt man har fundet en håndfuld huller i jorden, så skal man måske alligevel tøve med at gå i panik. Bloggen Real Climate drives af kerneforskerne bag IPCC

Siberia has explosion holes in it that smell like methane, and there are newly found bubbles of methane in the Arctic Ocean. As a result, journalists are contacting me assuming that the Arctic Methane Apocalypse has begun. However, as a climate scientist I remain much more concerned about the fossil fuel industry than I am about Arctic methane. Short answer: It would take about 20,000,000 such eruptions within a few years to generate the standard Arctic Methane Apocalypse that people have been talking about.

Rart at vide at der trods alt er grænser for vanviddet.

Bulldozing the Border Between Iraq and Syria: The Islamic State (Part 5)

5. og sidste del af Vice News serie om kalifatet

On August 8, nearly three years after the United States pulled out of Iraq, President Barack Obama ordered airstrikes to commence on Islamic State positions in northern Iraq, as the group’s fighters advanced towards the Kurdish capital of Erbil. For six weeks prior to the strikes the Islamic State made stunning gains within Iraq, effectively dismantling the border with Syria and defeating the Iraqi army with little in the way to stop them.

In the final installment of VICE News’ unprecedented look inside the Islamic State, reporter Medyan Dairieh journeys 200 miles from the the group’s power base in the Syrian city of Raqqa to the border with Iraq. There, after defeating the Iraqi army manning the checkpoint, Islamic State fighters work further to bulldoze the border.

As they clear apart a barrier that divided Iraq and Syria, Islamic State fighters declare an end of the Sykes-Picot Agreement, a nearly 100-year-old pact between France and Britain that divided up the Middle East. For now, that area between Iraq and Syria is part of a new territory: the Islamic State.

Click here to watch all 5 Parts of The Islamic State:

Og her er filmen så i fuld længde

FNs krig mod Israel II

Antisemitisme, Arabere, Diverse, Hamas, Israel, Muslimer, Terror, UNWRA, islam — Drokles on August 13, 2014 at 8:36 pm

Hamas har trygt overladt undervisningen af gazanerne til UNWRA, der med mere en 10.000 ansatte driver 245 skoler for 232.000 elever i sikker tiltro til at deres islamiske budskab nok skal blive indoktrineret. Vi har set, hvorledes 3 af disse FN drevne skoler i Gaza er afsløret i at opbevare Hamas våben, der blev leveret tilbage til, hvad de kaldte de rette myndigheder - altså Hamas. Og vi har set Hamas affyre raketter fra FN skoler og hvorledes en massakre blev fabrikeret på en af disse skoler da IDF straffede et par terrorister, der affyrede raketter mod Israel lige uden for skolen. Det hele som om UNWRA og Hamas er smeltet sammen. Det er i hvert fald Daniel Greenfields påstand på bloggen Sultan Knish, og det er svært at være andet end enig med ham

If an organization consists largely of Hamas members who use it pursue Hamas goals, then the organization is Hamas.

The UNRWA is Hamas.

Hamas use of the UNRWA as its public face is a war crime, but terrorists commit war crimes without a second thought. But the UN and the UNRWA are complicit in the war crime by allowing Hamas to go on exploiting the UN brand. It’s unfortunately commonplace for humanitarian organizations in war zones to collaborate with terrorists and guerrillas in one form or another. But the UNRWA isn’t just paying money to Hamas in exchange for being allowed to operate, the way that many groups in war zones do, it has allowed Hamas to turn its operations in Gaza into an extension of the terrorist group.

Hamas is listed as a Foreign Terrorist Organization. It’s against the law for the United States to fund it. By funding the UNRWA, the United States is paying Hamas and participating in its war crimes. Using civilian and humanitarian facilities for military purposes is a war crime. Using them to stage attacks against civilians by attackers out of uniform adds further crimes to the total.

The United States provided $130 million to the UNRWA in 2013.The UNRWA’s continued operations in Gaza would not be viable without American funding. Congressional investigations and condemnations have led to nothing. The UNRWA has adopted neutrality policies, but it has refused to put up a firewall between it and Hamas. And it can’t, because it has become an arm of Hamas.

When Kerry visited Gaza in 2009, the UNRWA’s Gaza chief passed along a letter to him from Hamas. The incident showed that not only was the locally recruited staff working for Hamas, but the UNRWA leadership was clearly cooperating with the terrorist group.

The original “refugees” that the UNRWA was set up to cater to are for the most part dead. The UNRWA has become another UN boondoggle funding a welfare state for “refugee camps” that are older, bigger and more developed than many Middle Eastern cities.

Meanwhile the UNRWA has become the public face of Hamas.

UNRWA staff act as terrorists when they use UNRWA facilities for military purposes, but then switch back to UNRWA when Israel fights back. Hamas carries out attacks. The UNRWA demands ceasefires. Hamas uses UNRWA schools and the UNRWA denounces Israel when an attack happens.

Den 23. juli besluttede FNs Mennskerettighedsråd at nedsætte en kommission til at undersøge Israels angivelige krigsforbrydelser. Den 3 mand store kommission skal bestå blandt andre af professor i international lov, forelæser ved Middlesex University og internationalt alment respekteret ekspert i menneskerettigheder, folkemord og dødsstraf Mr William Schabas. Schabas kvalificerede sig givetvis ved for et år siden at udtale at den person han helst så anklaget for krigsforbrydelser var Benjamin Netanyahu. Dette baseret på Goldstonerapporten, FNs smædeskrift mod Israel efter Operation Cast Lead, hvor Netanyahu ikke var premierminister

Christians in the Caliphate: The Islamic State

Fjerde del af Vice News serie om kalifatet

The lightning advances of the Islamic State across Syria and Iraq in June shocked the world. But it’s not just the group’s military victories that have garnered attention — it’s also the pace with which its members have begun to carve out a viable state.

As the soldiers of the Islamic State continue in their effort to build up institutions in the north central Syrian city of Raqqa, the Hisbah, or religious police, are tasked with enforcing a particularly harsh form of Sharia law.

In part 4 of The Islamic State, VICE News visits the Sharia courts where those accused of infractions are sentenced to harsh penalties, including death by crucifixion. But the courts don’t just handle crime. Citizens can bring all manners of complaints, including family disputes, and see the Islamic State’s form of justice doled out.

With unprecedented access, VICE News reporter Medyan Dairieh also visits the section of the court specifically set up for Christians, where the Islamic State discusses its treatment of minorities, and sees a former Armenian Catholic Church that has been converted into an Islamic center.

ISIS er hvor muslimer er

Der skal være en klangbund for den slags.  ISIS har truet med at indtage Tyrkiet og det er der måske flere tyrkere, som vil foretrække. I hvert fald kan man i Istanbul allerede købe merchandise både ved en bod


Og i en forretning


Også i London blafrer ISIS flag


En nonne rev dog ISIS flaget ned. Og journalisten Ted Jeory fortæller The Express, hvorledes venstrefløjsere er bekymret for islams omdømme

I WAS told this morning by a community activist in east London to be kind in this article to the Bengali Muslim youths who threatened violence last night…and who told me to “F*** off Jew, you’re not welcome here.”

Der bliver meget for venstrefløjen at skulle bortforklare den kommende tid. ISIS i Holland

Danmarks Radio rapporterer at der også skulle være ISIS tilhængere i Malaysia og Indonesien, der blandt andet vil sprænge et Carlsberg bryggeri i luften. Danmarks Radio er lidt usikre på deres kilder, men det er Tarek Fatah ikke, der mener at vide at disse friske unge mænd er ISIS Indonesien

I Tyskland, hvor muslimer gik løs på yazidier, er aviserne ifølge Gatestone Institute chokerede

“Never before have the sympathizers of Islamic terror appeared so openly in Germany.” — Editorial, Westfalen-Blatt.

“Anyone who thought the civil war in Syria or the barbarity of the Islamic State in Iraq does not affect us, you are wrong.” — Editorial, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung.

“IS, Al-Qaeda, Hamas and Boko Haram—these four groups are the linchpins of the attempt to bomb an unstoppable modernity back into the Middle Ages.” — Editorial, Westfalen-Blatt.

“The religions of the world are increasingly being misused for ideological struggles and excesses of violence between people of different faiths. Religions are never violent per se, but the market criers of violence are using them to promote their own interests.” — Editorial, Neue Westfälische.


Og fra Toronto, hvor en anti-ISIS demonstration blev imødegået af en Hama sympatisører, blot for lige at markere at det er den samme

I Danmark kom ISIS sympatisører blot tilfældigt forbi en anti-ISIS demonstration på Christiansborg Slotsplads og måtte betale prisen

Og i Danmark kan man ifølge Uriasposten også købe smart merchandise til støtte for ISIS


Måske er det ikke gået helt op for dem at sløjfen også er en Jesusfisk. I Norge (via Snaphanen)

Dette er blot samlet af, hvad jeg er stødt på, men sympatien findes grangiveligt i hele umma’en. ISIS’ grusomheder genrejser islams potens og det varmer de fleste muslimske hjerter.

Enforcing Sharia in Raqqa (The Islamic State Part 3)

Arabere, Arabiske forår, Forbrydelse og straf, Irak, Jihad, Kalifatet, Muslimer, Sharia, Syrien, islam — Drokles on August 12, 2014 at 5:19 am

3. del af Vice News serie om ISIS

The Islamic State now governs its caliphate from the north central Syrian city of Raqqa, which was once a relatively westernized agricultural hub. As the State’s power base, Raqqa is where it imposes its version of Sharia law throughout large swaths of Iraq and Syria.

The “Hisbah” are the new Sharia police. In the latest episode of The Islamic State, VICE News joins them on their daily patrols during Ramadan, and witnesses how they check on shops and scrutinize produce, while at the same time ensuring their strict rules on women’s appearances are adhered to.

We are also taken to an Islamic State prison and speak with inmates accused of abusing drugs and selling alcohol. There we learn firsthand of the prisoners’ punishments, and how they have since “rediscovered” their devotion to the Islamic faith since their incarceration — but are yet to be granted permission to declare their allegiance to the caliph, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.

FNs krig mod Israel

Antisemitisme, Arabere, FN, Forbrydelse og straf, Hamas, Historie, Israel, Jihad, Muslimer, Terror, islam — Drokles on August 12, 2014 at 5:04 am

Anne Bayefsky skriver i Jerusalem Post om FNs vedvarende krig mod Israel

On August 6, 2014, the United Nations convened the entire global community for an unusual day-long “informal” session of the General Assembly. The purpose: to demonize the Jewish state and emasculate its right of self-defense.

The UN formula for ravaging Israel by ignoring the criminal actions of its foes – and the foes of the civilized world – is breathtaking.

Not one of the UN speakers – the Secretary-General, the representative of the Office of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), the UN Human Rights Commissioner, the UN’s MidEast envoy, the head of UNRWA – even uttered the word “tunnel.”

Israel was denounced for destroying “homes and neighborhoods” and “civilian infrastructure.” But the fact that Israel had destroyed an extraordinary labyrinth of 32 terror tunnels deep underground – running for miles, jam packed with explosives, opening near Israeli towns, and built for the sole purpose of killing Jews – somehow just got left out.

Terror tunnels also did not make it into repeated references to “root causes.” Hamas’ promise to kill Jews and “obliterate” Israel did not count as a root cause of the conflict either. At the UN, “root cause” is reserved for the Israeli “occupation” – that is, the non-existent Jews that have not lived in Gaza for eight years.

Part of the reason that Palestinian hate-speech does not make it on to the UN agenda is that the UN has no definition of terrorism. In UN circles, Hamas is not a terrorist organization, but a welcome member of the Palestinian “unity” government.


Disturbing evidence of possible UNRWA complicity in Hamas attacks, which warranted a full investigation, was ignored. The facts that UNRWA schools have been used as Hamas rocket storage facilities and that the immediate vicinity of UNRWA schools have been used as staging grounds for Hamas rocket attacks were shrugged off with an implausible “we had no clue,” a de minimis naughty-naughty, or a lecture about overcrowding.

Meanwhile, UNRWA chief Pierre Krähenbühl had the audacity to complain of Israeli actions that inadvertently have damaged its schools: “we cannot comprehend why they occurred.”

Og selvfølgelig kunne Aljazeera også skrive at FN vil have undersøgt Israel for krigsforbrydelser

The United Nations has named experts to an international commission of inquiry into possible human rights violations and war crimes committed by both sides during Israel’s military offensive in the Gaza Strip.

Israel responded to Monday’s announcement, dismissing the inquiry as a UN Human Rights Council “kangaroo court”.

Sami Abu Zuhri, Hamas spokesman in Gaza said “Hamas welcomes the decision to form an investigation committee into the war crimes committed by the occupation (Israel) against Gaza and it urges that it begin work as soon as possible.”

The UN statement said the independent team will investigate “all violations of international humanitarian law and international human rights law … in the context of the military operations conducted since 13 June 2014.”

Men der er ikke megen kød på en sådan anklage, som ekspert i humanitærret Cecilie Hellestveit forklarer Dagsavisen

Hellestveit mener Det israelske forsvaret (IDF) ser ut til å ha «tatt høyde for å redusere sivile tap».

– De har ringt befolkningen i forkant av angrep og har raketter som de skyter mot hus for å advare før angrep. Men det ser også ut til å ha vært misforståelser på bakken, der sivile har misforstått og ikke forlatt husene eller blitt bedt lokalt om å bli værende.


– Dersom det er oppbevart militært utstyr på sykehusene og de brukes av væpnede aktører, som Hamas, for å skyte ut raketter, mister sykehusene den humanitære beskyttelsen. Vi kan da være i den paradoksale situasjonen at Hamas er krigsforbryteren. Dermed vil palestinerne være både de som lider og de som sitter igjen med ansvaret for krigsforbrytelser. Det er fryktelig urettferdig, men folkerettens system er slik. Man må bevise at Israel med overlegg har angrepet sykehus uten at det har blitt benyttet militært av Hamas. Dersom vi derimot snakker om et moralsk ansvar, har Israel et veldig mye høyere ansvar enn palestinerne for konflikten her, sier Hellestveit.

Derimod er Hamas modus operandi at begå krigsforbrydelser, som Ynet News stille pointerer

Justice Minister Tzipi Livni presented on Thursday a document in Arabic which explicitly instructs terrorists to deliberately fire at the Israeli army from within places where civilians are present, and thus harm its image.

Livni met with the President of the International Committee of the Red Cross and presented him with the guidelines, found in the pocket of a terrorist in Saja’iyya.

The page includes clear-cut instructions on how on the proper conduct during battle in order to cause maximum damage to Israel’s public image, while using innocent civilians as human shields.

Among the recommendations included in the manual, which admits that “the IDF limits the use of ammunition to avoid harming the civilian population,” Hamas officials wrote: “The IDF limits the use of fire against civilian population centers – we recommend to attack from there; shooting from within homes of civilians is in Hamas’ interest because it intensifies the hatred against the Israeli army.”

Ideen er, som palæstinensiske Bassem Eid forklarer i i24 News

Hamas has never considered Palestinian needs – only its own political interests. And so they have continued to fire rockets at Israel, knowing full-well what the result would be: Hamas paved the road for the death of our people. We knew that Hamas was digging the tunnels that would lead to our destruction.

We all know that three people live on every square meter in Gaza, and Hamas knew that any attack by Israel would lead to massive death. But Hamas leaders are more interested in their victories than in the lives of their victims. Indeed, Hamas needs these deaths in order to claim victory. Death of its own people empowers Hamas, enabling it to accrue more money and more arms.

Og FN er, som Bayefsky forklarer medskyldige i Hamas krigsforbrydelser, ikke blot for at opbevare Hamas raketter og lade deres bygninger udgøre dække og for at lyve og propagandere for Hamas, men også for at fragte Hamas krigere rundt fra slagmark til slagmark

Et lille makabert billede af galskaben

Antisemitisme, Arabere, Muslimer, Muslimguf, Obama, Terror, islam — Drokles on August 9, 2014 at 3:39 am

Forleden henviste jeg til til historien om Pallywoods fine produktion Massakren ved Rafa. IDF havde bombet nogle terrorister, der skød raketter af udenfor en FN drevet skole. Ligene blev prompte trukket ind på skolens område og et barnelig blev tilsat for ekstra effekt. Og Obama så det og græd og fordømte Israel.


Men flere billeder dukkede op af sundhedspersonale i Gaza, der tilsyneladende forsøger at redde eller genoplive pigen.


Hvis pigen var død allerede da hun blev brugt som model genbruger sundhedspersonalet i endnu et stykke propaganda. Da sundhedspersonalets propaganda negerer gadeaktivisternes er det noget de gør per automatik.´

Omvendt, hvis pigen endnu ikke var død eller, hvis hun lige var død, da hun ankom til hospitalet så kunne hun være reddet, hvis ikke hun skulle bruges til tidkrævende propaganda til ære for en villigt godtroende Obama.

Grooming Children for Jihad: The Islamic State (Part 2)

Arabere, Arabiske forår, Jihad, Kalifatet, Muslimer, Syrien, Terror, Tyrkiet, islam, muhammed — Drokles on August 9, 2014 at 1:36 am

2. del af filmen om Kalifatet.

In Part 2 of VICE News’ exclusive look at the emergence of the Islamic State, filmmaker Medyan Dairieh meets an Islamic State member from Belgium who works to indoctrinate some of the youngest members of the group. He also gains further insight into the minds of Islamic State fighters as they host celebrations and military parades featuring American tanks and APCs seized from the Iraqi army.

The Islamic State, a hardline Sunni jihadist group which formerly had ties to al Qaeda, is now in control of a large swath of territory in Iraq and Syria. The group, which adheres to the strictest form of Sharia law, is determined to establish a caliphate that stretches across the Middle East and into the rest of the Muslim world.

As the Islamic State continues its violent expansion in Syria and Iraq, it is also working to win the hearts and minds of new recruits and potential new members in areas it controls.

Next Page »

Monokultur kører på WordPress