Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /var/www/monokultur.dk/public_html/wp-settings.php on line 520

Deprecated: Function set_magic_quotes_runtime() is deprecated in /var/www/monokultur.dk/public_html/wp-settings.php on line 18

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl(&$output) in /var/www/monokultur.dk/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1199

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl(&$output) in /var/www/monokultur.dk/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1199

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /var/www/monokultur.dk/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1199

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el(&$output) in /var/www/monokultur.dk/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1199

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_PageDropdown::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /var/www/monokultur.dk/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1244

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl(&$output) in /var/www/monokultur.dk/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1391

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl(&$output) in /var/www/monokultur.dk/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1391

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /var/www/monokultur.dk/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1391

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el(&$output) in /var/www/monokultur.dk/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1391

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_CategoryDropdown::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /var/www/monokultur.dk/public_html/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1442

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class wpdb in /var/www/monokultur.dk/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 306

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Object_Cache in /var/www/monokultur.dk/public_html/wp-includes/cache.php on line 431

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Comment::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl(&$output) in /var/www/monokultur.dk/public_html/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1266

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Comment::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl(&$output) in /var/www/monokultur.dk/public_html/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1266

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Comment::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /var/www/monokultur.dk/public_html/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1266

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Comment::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el(&$output) in /var/www/monokultur.dk/public_html/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1266

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Dependencies in /var/www/monokultur.dk/public_html/wp-includes/class.wp-dependencies.php on line 31

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Http in /var/www/monokultur.dk/public_html/wp-includes/http.php on line 61

Warning: explode() expects parameter 2 to be string, array given in /var/www/monokultur.dk/public_html/wp-content/plugins/bannage.php on line 15
Monokultur » 2013 » November


Mikro aggression i det akademiske

Daily Caller fortæller om et, for mig, nyt ord til at findele racisme

Racial tensions are inflamed at the University of California at Los Angeles following several incidents — most notably, one where a professor corrected the grammar, punctuation and capitalization in minority students’ assignments.

The act of correcting a black student was “micro-aggression,” according to the members of the student group “Call 2 Action: Graduate Students of Color,” which launched a sit-in during a subsequent meeting of the class.

Den bigote professor Val Rust prøvede at forsvare sit klare svigt

“I have attempted to be rather thorough on the papers and am particularly concerned that they do a good job with their bibliographies and citations, and these students apparently don’t feel that is appropriate,” he said in a statement, according to The Daily Bruin.

Some of the corrections were clarified by sit-in organizer Kenjus Watson. Rust told one student that she should not capitalize the word “indigenous” in her papers. This correction was ideologically-motivated, according to Watson.

Rust admitted that he likely made matters worse by not aggressively and proactively taking the side of a minority student who was engaged in an argument with a white female student. The minority student told the woman that she had no right to feel oppressed, and Rust did not express agreement either way.

Det er svært at forestille sig at man overhovedet kan forsvare sig mod en anklage om ‘mikro aggression’. Det ligner en portal til Salem. Følsomheden er sværere at spore den anden vej. Professor Noel Ignatiev’s makro aggressive udtryk møder ingen proteser i den akademiske verden (her fra en noget antisemitisk og vist nok også småracistisk hjemmeside)

(en satire, der er blevet taget for lidt for gode varer af alt for mange, over Ignatievs holdninger kan findes på Diversity Chronicle) En skør kugle gør selvfølgelig ingen sommer, men Ignatievs er rigt repræsenteret i forskellige variationer i de definerende klasser, akademiske som kvasiakademiske og som han selv fortæller, så møder han kun professionel og kollegial forståelse for sine rablerier.

Et lille logisk og bemærkelsesværdigt udslag af minoriteternes selvretfærdiggørelse kombineret med de definerende klassers defamering af “hvidhed” og hvides følgende skyldkompleks er det såkaldte “knockout game”, sorte teenagere, i medierne blot  ’teenagere’ som uoverlagt og uden varsel slår hvide forbipasserende ned, skriver Frontpage Magazine

For those unfamiliar with the knockout game, it’s how some black youths amuse themselves, especially in urban settings. The goal: use a single devastating punch to knock a victim unconscious. And when they succeed, they invariably react with merriment and laughter, as videos capturing the mayhem have revealed. Could racism be motivating these black youths? Nobody in the mainstream media dares suggest that this might be fueling the black mob violence in what President Obama said would be a post-racial era.

The knockout game, to be sure, has been around a few years. It has been mostly ignored by the mainstream media, which generally airbrushes out the black-on-white nature of the mayhem.

No, it’s not a macho thing, its a black thing.

En lille undersøgelse fra forleden fortalte at 6 af 10 danske danskere var bange for at møde grupper af unge muslimske mænd, i medierne ‘unge med indvandrerbaggrund, på gaden. En hurtig analyse siger følgeligt at 4 af 10 lyver - for sig selv eller for spørgeskemaet. Fortællingen om at racisme er en iboende karakterbrist specifikt hos hvide sidder så fast at end ikke dygtige satirikere evner andet end et stereotypt opgør med stereotyper.

Fredagsfilm: Stalins abehær

Diverse, Historie, Josef Stalin, Kommunisme, venstrefløjen — Drokles on November 29, 2013 at 11:01 am

Jytte Klausen igen igen

Akademia, Arabiske forår, Historie, Jihad, Pressen, Ytringsfrihed, islam, muhammed — Drokles on November 26, 2013 at 5:07 am

Per Stig Møller påstår nu at Anders Fogh Rasmussens afvisning af at mødes med 11 ambassadører fra muslimske lande under Muhammedkrisen var en fejl, en kommunikations fejl endda. Det får selvfølgelig Danmarks Radio til at spørge hvad de kalder en ekspert, men som viser sig at være Jytte Klausen, som kalder det ubegribeligt fordi hun mener at krisen i så fald kunne være løst tidligere.

- Afvisningen gjorde ambassadørerne meget vrede og det opildnede også diplomaterne i Kairo en hel del, siger hun.

Nemlig Klausen, for det er ikke de 11 ambassadører, der er langt ude i deres absurde krav på at gå udenom Udenrigsministeriet, som protokollen ellers kræver, for at blæse deres afsindige krav til vores frihed helt ud af proportioner. Det er ikke dem, der har ansvaret for deres egen vrede for ikke at blive efterkommet i det urimelige. Det er nemlig Foghs og Danmarks skyld at muslimer går amok og myrder løs, som det er vores skyld at muslimer ikke blot ikke kan tåle at se tegninger, men ikke engang kan leve i bevidstheden om at der et eller andet sted i Verden eksisterer tegninger, som de måske ikke kan goutere. Godt kaldt Klausen og tak til Danmarks Radio for at højne vores niveau med dette knæfald for psykopat argumentet.

- Det er stadig tilfældet, at når man taler om Muhammedtegningerne og fornærmelsen mod profeten, så kommer Danmark op i den næste sætning, siger Jytte Klausen.

Med ‘profeten’ mener Klausen muhammedanernes profet og ikke f.eks Esijas eller Obama. Hvem Klausen taler med står dog hen i det uvisse, men jeg vil ikke håbe for muslimerne at det stadig er den døde hest de tæsker i, som den sekteriske vold i Mellemøsten ser ud til at trække sunnimuslimer og shiamuslimer ind i endnu et opgør. Men desværre, så er det med tanke på muslimers generelle mentalitet nok ikke så langt et stræk at forestille sig at muslimer kerer sig mere over tanken om en tegning end 100.000 døde syrere - ligesom akademikere. Eller om den massive kristenforfølgelse - ligesom akademikere. Eller den massive kvindeundertrykkelse - ligesom… well, argumenterne har været gentaget uden de sank ind.

flag_burning1

Verdensreligionernes udbredelse på 90 sekunder

Diverse — Drokles on November 23, 2013 at 6:45 pm

BBC: Our World - Iran’s Secret Army

Arabiske forår, BBC, Jihad, islam — Drokles on November 23, 2013 at 6:30 pm

En lille halv times dokumentar fra BBC om Irans involvering i den syriske borgoerkrig

.mnb

Kennedy

Diverse — Drokles on November 22, 2013 at 8:50 pm

Som en del af markeringen af 50 året for John F Kennedys dødsdag trækker flere medier forskellige konspirationsteoretikere frem for at give mindehøjtidelighederne lidt ekstra kolorit. På BT kan man læse Øjenlæge Jens Thygesen’s teori om at det dræbende skud ikke kom fra skolebogsdepotets 5. sal, hvor Lee Harvey Oswald ellers sad og skød ud ad vinduet med sin italienske Carcano riffel. Det dræbende skud kom derimod fra “the Grassy Knoll”, en græsskråning fra en parkeringsplads ned mod vejen kortegen passerede og det ser Thygesen bekræftet af en computermanipuleret fotografi

6987261-kennedy-ny

Danmarks Radio synes de skal højne licensbetalernes kritiske niveau ved at agere mikrofonholder for James Tague, der udover at have skrevet sin egen bog med sit bud på, hvem der virkeligt stod bag (daværende vicepræsident Johnson i samarbejde med FBI’s J. Edgar Hoover) ikke blot var vidne den tragiske fredag formiddag, men også blev ramt af et stykke cement, der sprang fra en kantsten, hvor en af projektilerne ramte

- Hvorfor de gjorde det? Jamen, det var de nødt til. De ville have, at kun en person stod bag det: Lee Harvey Oswald. Han var en nem person at skyde skylden på, forklarer James Tague til DRs USA-korrespondent, Johannes Langkilde.

(…)

- To af verdens mest magtfulde mænd havde ansvaret. Og der var ingen, man kunne henvende sig til og sige: Jeg ved, hvad der skete, siger han.

Hoovers centrale rolle i efterforskningen er samtidig årsagen til, at Kennedys mord aldrig blev opklaret, mener Tague.

- Warrenkommisionen fik kun informationer fra FBI. Og chefen fra FBI stod i spidsen for at dække over sandheden, forklarer forfatteren.

(…)

- Problemet er jo, at stakkels Oswald ikke var gerningsmanden, siger James Tague og tvivler på, at han nogensinde bliver renset.

- Men nu har jeg dokumenteret det: Det var ikke ham, der skød, siger forfatteren overbevisende.

Langkilde er måske overbevist, men, som Daniel Greenfield skriver i Frontpage Magazine, så er det måske mere et udslag af en venstreorienteret ønsketænkning

The JFK theories were too important to the liberals who were really running things to allow them to die out.

(…)

The JFK assassination became a liberal martyrdom in search of a conservative inquisitioner. Oliver Stone’s JFK was a laborious effort to connect the murder of a liberal icon to the despicable conservative villains that his political martyrdom demanded.

The endless search for the real killers was not done to find them, but to perpetuate the myth. The search could never be complete; the conspiracy theories could provide no closure; though the lynching of Nixon for daring to try and make JFK’s ideas work helped put to rest the ghosts of Camelot for many angry liberals.

JFK was not killed by some miasma of right-wing hatred, by a confederacy of Cuban exiles, CIA agents and Sicilian mafia bosses.

The directions in which the JFK conspiracy theories point reveal what they are trying to hide. John F. Kennedy was not murdered by a miasma of hatred on the right, but on the left. Before liberals became leftists, leftists had a propensity for killing liberals.

And Lee Harvey Oswald was as far to the left as you could go.

There was never really any disagreement about Lee Harvey Oswald’s politics. The media has avoided the issue by characterizing him as a screwball, but Lee Harvey Oswald was a militant Socialist screwball who defected to the USSR and plotted the murders of people he considered “right-wing.”

Lee Harvey Oswald was part of a continuum of left-wing terror in America. The murder of JFK was a bridge between the explosions of violence in the twenties by anarchists and by the Weathermen in the seventies. Oswald was the leading edge of American left-wing violence.

Et lille kommunalvalgsgylp

Diverse — Drokles on November 20, 2013 at 8:15 pm

Der er en tilbagevendende og absurd debat om exitpolls i kølvandet på Danmarks Radios besynderlige “exitprognose” - en modig blanding af to statistiske metoder der skulle eliminere usikkerhed, men som snarere øger usikkerheden. Ideen er at blande nogle meningsmålinger op til kommunalvalget med exitpolls for at give et forudsigelse af det endelige resultat. Hvorledes Danmarks Radio har troet at et gennemsnit, uanset hvor vægtet (og vægtet på hvilken baggrund?) af vælgeres ugegamle intentioner med trufne valg skulle give et mere meningsfuldt billede af et endeligt resultat end blot en ren vægtet exitpoll må guderne vide.

Men ikke nok med det tåbelige i Danmarks Radios metode, så kludrer de endda i gennemførelsen. Resultat blev at de spektakulært forudsagde at Venstre ville blive det største kommunale parti på bekostning af det regerende Socialdemokrati, der skulle gå et historiske nederlag i møde. Således gik det ikke, virkeligheden viste at folk ikke gad straffe Venstre synderligt for Løkkes rejsevaner og gav en beskeden fremgang til det gamle bondeparti, mens sosserne gik lidt tilbage, men så rigeligt beholdt deres føring, som det største kommunale parti.

Thorning gik dog på talerstolen på baggrund af den exitprognose, som hun havde set på Danmarks Radio allerede inden 1/3 af stemmer var talt op og tog på baggrund af Danmarks Radios idioti det forsmædelige nederlag delvist på sin kappe. Derved kom hun til at demonstrere lige så dårlige dømmekraft, som hendes partis TV station havde demonstreret inkompetence.

Dagen derpå kan man så høre sossernes Rasmus Heunicke, Enhedslistens Pernille Skipper, diverse røde eksperter og Berlingskes Lisbeth Knudsen kræve et forbud af Exitpolls. Argumenterne er mangelfulde skiftesvis vrøvlende. Polls’ne har en effekt på vælgerne hedder det, men ingen ved hvilken, hverken kvantitativt eller kvalitativt; vælgerne skal have fred, skønt alle medier har en slukknap vælgerne selv administrerer; og valget skal holdes helligt skønt mere viden ikke er et traditionelt demokratisk problem - ikke for os borgerlige i hvert fald!

Så her er konklusionen: Når Danmarks Radio demonstrerer deres inkompetence og Thorning afslører en dårlig dømmekraft ikke blot ved at sidde og se Danmarks Radio, men ligefrem stole på den strøm af vrøvl så følger ikke en kritik af de to røde bastioner, Socialdemokratiet og deres tv-station, næh, så følger et krav om med lov at rette virkeligheden til, så sosser i politik og medier ikke kan kludre i det for al fremtid.

Iranium

Diverse, Israel, Jihad, islam — Drokles on November 14, 2013 at 10:57 am

Tyfonjægerne

Diverse, IPCC, Klima, Pressen — Drokles on November 13, 2013 at 12:29 pm

justaintso

Spiked Online skriver om dommedagsprofeterne, der falder over hinanden i håbet om at næste uvejr vil indvarsle Jordens undergang.

Let’s hear it for science! The UK Met Office was issuing warnings days ago about a storm that would sweep across the Atlantic and hit the UK on Sunday and Monday. Before the storm even existed. But if the storm was a great piece of forecasting, you didn’t need a supercomputer to predict the reaction to the storm’s approach.

From the first inkling that the country was going to be hit by unusually strong winds and heavy rain, the nation’s panicmongers went into overdrive. There were days of repeated warnings about just how bad it was going to be - with lots of allusions to the ‘Great Storm’ of 1987 (itself only a ‘great storm’ in a country that doesn’t really do big storms). This week’s storm was christened ‘St Jude’ (the patron saint of lost causes) by a Weather Channel forecaster, and the name quickly became common currency. The UK prime minister, David Cameron, made great play of holding an ‘emergency meeting’ to make sure the country was ready. Train operators decided to institute blanket cancellations of services across the south of England. At every stage, we were told to ‘be prepared’.

The result, however, was by and large a damp squib.

Tyfonen ”Haiyan” var dog meget mere end a damp squib. Og dommedagsprofeterne kom da også ud i stort tal for at smede mens ligene endu var varme. Jyllands-Posten skrev f.eks under overskriften “En forsmag på fremtiden

Tyfonen ”Haiyan”, der har dræbt over 10.000 mennesker, fordrevet andre 478.000 fra deres hjem og berørt i alt 4,5 mio., kan være en forsmag på, hvad der er i vente i et varmere klima. Tyfonen er formentlig den kraftigste, der nogensinde er registreret, og ifølge klimaforskere tyder meget på, at det hænger sammen med den globale opvarmning.

»Der er ingen tvivl om, at dette er en konsekvens af, at det bliver varmere på kloden,« lyder det fra klimaforsker Sebastian Mernild fra Center for Scientific Studies i Valdivia i Chile.

Filipinernes klimakommisær, ja, der er sådan en alle vegne, erklærede at han vil sultestrejke “indtil et meningsfuldt mål er i sigte“, men kun så længe han var i Polen, hvor der lige nu er klimakonference.

For alle jer der stadig benægter, at klimaforandringer er virkelighed; Jeg udfordrer jer til at komme ned fra jeres gyldne tårn og væk fra lænestolens komfort,” lød det.

1393116_10152067151878128_1726406800_n

God tur hjem og velbekomme. Noget mere nuanceret kunne man læse på Climate Central, der i overskriften “A hint of what’s to come?” trods alt satte et spørgsmålstegn ved hvad fremtiden byder.

…there is more consensus about the stormier future than there is about the present. The researchers also urged caution in attributing Haiyan’s strength to global warming, given the lack of evidence that manmade global warming has had any detectable influence on Western Pacific typhoons, let alone tropical cyclones in general (an umbrella term that includes typhoons and hurricanes).

Brian McNoldy, a a senior research associate at the University of Miami, told Climate Central that, “While Haiyan was absolutely amazing, it’s not alone. It’s in an elite company of a handful of other tropical cyclones scattered across the decades and across the world.”

McNoldy downplayed global warming’s role in helping to fuel Super Typhoon Haiyan, saying, “We don’t get to pick and choose which storms are enhanced by a warmer climate and which ones aren’t, so this was just as subject to this year’s climate as the numerous others that weren’t so impressive. Extremely intense tropical cyclones are rare, but have always been a part of nature — we don’t need to find an excuse for them.”

Gabe Vecchi, a research oceanographer with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), said that if global warming altered Haiyan, it did not do so to a significant extent. “I expect that the contribution of global warming to Haiyan’s extreme intensity is likely to have been small, relative to other factors like weather fluctuations and climate variability.”

Climate research has not yet provided a clear picture of how global warming is altering tropical cyclones around the world.

(…)

The most recent IPCC report said: “Globally, there is low confidence in attribution of changes in tropical cyclone activity to human influence.” The IPCC found that insufficient observational evidence, a lack of understanding regarding the physical connection between manmade climate change and tropical storms, and considerable disagreement between studies justified downplaying any detectable changes in tropical cyclones due to global warming.

Og grunden til at “ there is more consensus about the stormier future than there is about the present” er fordi der er et konsensus om at forlade sig på computermodeller. Virkelighedens observationer viser nemlig ikke at have synderlig sammenhæng mellem tyfoner og stigende gennemsnitstemperatur, som Bjørn Lomborg skrev på Facebook

Yet, even *after* Haiyan, the Accumulated Cyclone Energy of all cyclones in the Western North Pacific is below normal (99%, http://models.weatherbell.com/tropical.php). The global ACE is at 74%.

As you can see in the graph below, both Northern Hemisphere ACE and global ACE are at the lowest since the 1970s.

Yes, there are ferocious cyclones in the world, as they always have been. But first, you can’t argue that global warming is making them worse, when the indicators are *lower*.

Second, claiming that CO? cuts is the way to tackle cyclone damages is simply immoral. Even if we cut emissions dramatically, it will have only little impact in 50-100 years. If you want to help places like Tacloban and the Philippines, it is all about adaptation.

1456661_10152081546708968_1547519889_n

Og klima og vejr er to forskellige størrelser, som vi ofte bliver belært om. Den tyske meterolog fortæller ifølge No Tricks Zone

What’s climate change got to do with it?

As always: immediately after an event is observed on the planet that supposedly ’had never happened before’, a discussion about the cause breaks out. And once again the discussion turns to the term: ‘climate change’.

‘Haiyan was one of the most powerful typhoons ever observed’ – at first that sounds very suspenseful, but an important small piece of information gets left out, namely: ‘Since weather records started being kept’.  And when it comes to tropical storms, regular weather records have been kept only for a few decades! When we speak of the strongest storm of ‘all time’, this ‘all-time’ is not even 100 years long.

The earth is really already more than 100 years old, and we don’t know at all what natural catastrophes occurred 500 or 1000 years ago - and we also don’t know which tropical storms took place.

For many ‘climate expert’ this recent event is a feeding frenzy that allows them to pound the drums of ‘evil climate change’. And here not a single one of these ladies and gentlemen are able to show that such storms never existed over the past hundreds of years, let alone that this storm is connected to a man-made climate change.

What came out of the mouths of climate experts after the last cold winters had gripped Central Europe?:

‘A few colder-than-normal winters are in no way any indication of a trend change when it comes to climate change.’ Well, using that logic, how is a single large typhoon then supposed to confirm climate change? A truly fascinating thought process!

De mange dødsfald er desværre heller ingen nyhed og de skyldes som så ofte før at de berørte samfund ikke har haft ressourcerne til at beskytte sig imod naturens luner fortæller Washington Post

If this death toll estimate holds up, however, it wouldn’t even put Haiyan in the top 35 deadliest tropical cyclones on record.

The story behind the destructiveness of Haiyan rings true of most powerful cyclones that occur in this region of the world: 33 of the 35 deadliest tropical cyclones on record have occurred in southern or southeastern Asia – due to a confluence of meteorology, geography, population density, poverty and government.

In the case of Super Typhoon Haiyan, Tacloban city and its 220,000 inhabitants are located at the tip of a funnel-shaped bay in the Leyte Gulf. The center of Haiyan’s eye brushed just a few miles south of Tacloban, putting the city right in the strongest part of the storm’s right-front quadrant. This unfortunate location along Haiyan’s track led to Tacloban receiving the brunt of the storm’s Category 5-equivalent winds, destroying “up to 80%” of the city’s buildings.

byzrdprcuaa4lwp

Så den filipinske klimakommisær burde måske hellere bruge sine ressourcer på at bygge sit land op så det bliver i stand til at tåle sin egen natur, frem for at sultestrejke.

Muslim: Straf vores kritikere eller vi går amok

Forbrydelse og straf, Multikultur, Uddannelse, Ytringsfrihed, islam, muhammed — Drokles on November 8, 2013 at 1:04 pm

En jurastuderende af anden etnisk oprindelse har fundet behag i blasfemiparagraffen og argumenterer over Universitetsavisen således foruroligende

Paragraffens sigte er at beskytte orden og fred, og den findes da også i dette kapitel i lovgivningen.

(…)

Under striden om Muhammedtegningerne var der rygter om, at nogen ville brænde Koranen på Rådhuspladsen i København, og på det tidspunkt oplyste Københavns Politi, at man kunne anholde initiativtagerne med henvisning til blasfemiparagraffen, igen for at undgå uroligheder. Det kom dog ikke til at ske, fordi afbrændingen forblev et rygte.

Blasfemiparagraffen bliver også beskyldt for at karambolere med ytringsfriheden. Men det er der hellerikke belæg for at hævde, at den har gjort i Danmark, når man ser, hvad der er blevet sagt om religioner fx i diskussionen om tegningerne fra Jyllands-Posten. Den debat førte ikke til, at nogen blev dømt for blasfemi, selv om der var folk, der ønskede det. Men der var heller ikke folk, der brændte ambassader af i Danmark eller lavede voldelige opstande.

Blasfemiparagraffen er der altså for at forhindre muslimer i at gå amok. Og det ville altså hjælpe, hvis de selv måtte lægge sag an under netop hensynet til deres eget voldpotentiale. Det ville være det ultimative law-fare våben.

Kampen om den rette lære

Diverse, Globalisering, Multikultur, Politik, Ytringsfrihed, islam, venstrefløjen — Drokles on November 8, 2013 at 12:46 pm

Fra FN henover EU til vores lille nation arbejder stærke kræfter imod friheden til at tænke, tro og tale frit. Clarion Projekt fortæller om OIC’s vedvarende arbejde for at isolere islam fra kritik

In its quest to criminalize speech that’s critical of all Islam-related topics, the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC)* endorsed the formation of a new Advisory Media Committee to address “Islamophobia.”

This past September, the OIC held “The First International Conference on Islamophobia: Law & Media.”  The conference endorsed numerous recommendations which arose from prior workshops on Islamophobia from media, legal and political perspectives.  A main conclusion was the consensus to institutionalize the conference and create an Advisory Media Committee to meet under the newly established OIC Media Forum based in Istanbul Turkey.

Supposedly, the purpose of the conference was to support an OIC campaign to “correct the image of Islam and Muslims in Europe and North America.” By this, it means to whitewash the intolerant, violent and discriminatory aspects of Islam and Islamists.  The OIC has launched a campaign to provide disinformation to the public, delinking all Islam from these undesirable traits and attacks all who insist on these truths, as bigots, racists and Islamophobes.

Morten Uhrskov Jensen fortæller på sin blog på Jyllands-Posten om et EU arbejdspapir, der skal lære befolkningen, det billige skidt, de rette værdier og tolerance. Tolerance udøves traditionelt at den der lytter, men for EU er tolerance en præventiv øvelse, der med bånd på mund og hånd, skal forhindre ytringer, udtryk og tanker i at nå sarte og voldsparate ører og øjne.

Det seneste skud på den totalitære stamme står at læse i et arbejdspapir fra EU-parlamentet. Titlen lyder:

A European Framework National Statute for the Promotion of Tolerance

Meningen er den, at dette arbejdspapir skal munde ud i, at de lovgivende forsamlinger i EU-landene skal vedtage indholdet af arbejdspapiret som lov.

Hvad står der så?

Ved hjælp af grov udnyttelse af begrebet tolerance præsenteres i praksis ideer, der vil forsøge at fratage især den opvoksende generation dens mulighed for at tænke selv. Vore børn skal i stedet lære at tænke på den “rigtige” måde. Det vil sige, at særligt børn og unge med djævelens vold og magt skal acceptere EU-elitens forsøg på at forvandle Europa til et blot beboet område for alle og derfor for ingen, mindst af alle europæerne selv. Andre såkaldt udsatte grupper er nævnt i arbejdspapiret, men i praksis er det ikke nogen hemmelighed, hvad dette handler om.

Vedtager det danske folketing dette papir som lov, har Folketinget forpligtet sig til, at skoler fra grundskolen og opefter skal indeholde undervisning, der “opfordrer børnene til at acceptere mangfoldighed og fremme et klima med tolerance.” (side 10) Det understreges, at det er “meget vigtigt” at påbegynde disse kurser “så tidligt som muligt”. Fem-seks årige børn i 0. klasse skal således tidligt i gang med at få lært noget tolerance.

Kurser i tolerance skal ligeledes gøres obligatoriske for militæret og politikorpset.

Herhjemme foreslog den nye ligestillingsminister ifølge TV2 at bibliotekerne lugede ud i lærebøger, der havde et forkert syn på køn og kønsroller.

- Der er behov for, at det kommer med i bekendtgørelser, så man undgår, at bøgerne fastholder forældede kønsrollemønstre, siger Rasmus Horn Langhoff til Politiken.

Han er faldet over en grundbog på sosu-uddannelserne, “Sundhed, omsorg og pædagogik”, som han mener gennem flere beskrivelser fastholder piger og drenge i fastlåste kønsroller.

Blandt andet står der i bogen, at drengelege gerne handler om “heltegerninger”, “hvor trusler og farer skal bekæmpes”.

Stereotype beskrivelser af køn er med til at sætte børn i bås og hæmme deres udfoldelsesmuligheder, mener Rasmus Horn Langhoff.

Denne farlige erfaring af virkeligheden står i vejen for det større projekt, hvor vi uddanner ”kernetropper til den danske velfærd”, som Langhoff forklarede senere på dagen til TV2 News. Ikke overraskende var SF’s ligestillingsordfører, Özlem Sara Cekic, begejstret mens Dansk Folkepartis ligestillingsordfører, Pia Adelsten var mere præcis og appelerede til at Rasmus Horn Langhoff ville “opføre sig som en mand”. Fat chance! Logikken tilskriver at der vil komme et opgør mellem EU’s og Langhoffs værdier om forceret ligeværd for nogle befolkningsgrupper mere end andre på den ene side og islamisk supremacisme på den anden. Men udviklingen viser at EU’s og Langhoffs idealer kun er et skalskjul for for at bekæmpe en fjende de har tilfælles med islam, hvorfor kræfterne forener sig, så at muslimerne får fripas til at islamificere vores samfund mod at vi føjer os. God weekend!

Vinteren kommer

Diverse, IPCC, Klima, Pressen — Drokles on November 7, 2013 at 4:02 pm

Man kan ikke ligefrem kalde et nyt konsensus eller et paradigmeskift indenfor klimaforskning, men de stemmer, der taler for Solens afgørende indflydelse på temperaturen er blevet stærkere og flere. Og de giver ikke meget for den menneskeskabte globale opvarmning. Medierne taler stadig om at al isen kan smelte med en havspejlsstigning på imponerende 66 meter til følge og at klodens opvarmning vil gøre ubehagelige dyr som slanger store som busser, mens gode dyr som heste små som katte. Men tag roligt jeres hest på skødet, ingen kæmpeslange vil trække jer under dybet lidt nord for Næstved. Den globale opvarmning udvikler sig så langt fra de skrækhistorier, der sælger så mange aviser og vindmøller. Daily Mail skriver f.eks. at de 17 år, der er gået uden at den globale temperatur er steget kan meget vel vare indtil 2030′erne

A paper in the peer-reviewed journal Climate Dynamics – by Professor Judith Curry of the Georgia Institute of Technology and Dr Marcia Wyatt – amounts to a stunning challenge to climate science orthodoxy.

Not only does it explain the unexpected pause, it suggests that the scientific majority – whose views are represented by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) – have underestimated the role of natural cycles and exaggerated that of greenhouse gases.

(…)

The pause means there has been no statistically significant increase in world average surface temperatures since the beginning of 1997, despite the models’ projection of a steeply rising trend.

According to Dr Hawkins, the divergence is now so great that the world’s climate is cooler than what the models collectively predicted with ‘five to 95 per cent certainty’.

Curry and Wyatt say they have identified a climatic ‘stadium wave’ – the phenomenon known in Britain as a Mexican wave,  in which the crowd at a stadium stand and sit so that a wave seems to circle the audience.

(…)

In similar fashion, a number of cycles in the temperature of air and oceans, and the level of Arctic ice, take place across the Northern hemisphere over decades. Curry and Wyatt say there is evidence of this going back at least 300 years.

According to Curry and Wyatt, the theory may explain both the warming pause and why the computer models did not forecast it.

It also means that a large proportion of the warming that did occur in the years before the pause was due not to greenhouse gas emissions, but to the same cyclical wave.

‘The stadium wave signal predicts that the current pause in global warming could extend into the 2030s,’ said Wyatt. This is in sharp contrast with the IPCC’s report, which predicts warming of between 0.3 and 0.7C by 2035.

Og BBC’s Paul Hudson interviewede Professor Mike Lockwood om en kommende Lille Istid (nok snarere Daltons minimum end Maunders)

Following analysis of the data, Professor Lockwood believes solar activity is now falling more rapidly than at any time in the last 10,000 years.

He found 24 different occasions in the last 10,000 years when the sun was in exactly the same state as it is now - and the present decline is faster than any of those 24.

Based on his findings he’s raised the risk of a new Maunder minimum from less than 10% just a few years ago to 25-30%.

And a repeat of the Dalton solar minimum which occurred in the early 1800s, which also had its fair share of cold winters and poor summers, is, according to him, ‘more likely than not’ to happen.

He believes that we are already beginning to see a change in our climate - witness the colder winters and poor summers of recent years - and that over the next few decades there could be a slide to a new Maunder minimum.

It’s worth stressing that not every winter would be severe; nor would every summer be poor. But harsh winters and unsettled summers would become more frequent.

Professor Lockwood doesn’t hold back in his description of the potential impacts such a scenario would have in the UK.

He says such a change to our climate could have profound implications for energy policy and our transport infrastructure.

Although the biggest impact of such solar driven change would be regional, like here in the UK and across Europe, there would be global implications too.

Og i Cern fortsætter Jasper Kirkby med sit CLOUD projekt, der empirisk skal eftervise danske Svensmarks teori om kosmisk strålings effekt på skydækket

Så hav vintertøjet parat, vinteren kommer, som de siger igen og igen og igen i Game of Thrones.

Så stop dog det fordrukne klimavrøvl

IPCC, Klima — Drokles on November 4, 2013 at 5:55 pm

I forrige uge henviste jeg til Nir Shavivs simple og informative graf over hvorlangt klimavidenskaben er kommet siden 1979 med at sige noget meningsfuldt om CO2’s indflydelse på atmosfærens temperatur. Grafen viser de forskellige FN rapporters usikkerhed ved en fordobling af CO2 i atmosfæren, fra mellem 1,5 til 4,5C.

sensitivityvstime1

Som man kan se er der efter mere end 30 år ikke kommet mere klarhed end den indledende rapport fra Charney rapporten. Denne mangel på forståelse forhindrer dog ingenlunde klimapanelet i at blive mere og mere overbevist om sin dommedagsforudsigelser, som Roy Spencer illustrerede med denne graf

1380364_10151934283967591_89494564_n

Spagetti-kurverne er de mange klimamodeller, som FN’s klimapanel dels bruger som projektion for mulige fremtidsscenarier, dels som bevis for deres teori, da de bekræfter deres antagelser. Ja, man tror det er løgn, men cirkelslutninger går aldrig af mode. Som man vil bemærke er de alle for opadgående og afspejler altså alle den samme antagelse. I og med at virkeligheden ikke afspejler den opadgående tendens er det den nærliggende slutning at det er deres fælles antagelse, der er forkert, hvilket altså er teorien om CO2’s dramatiske indvirkning på temperaturen.

Den fede sorte kurve er gennemsnittet af de mange kurver, en afsindig kurve. Det er det, som James Delingpole kalder Dog S**t Yoghurt Fallacy, nemlig at hvis man har noget som er rent så blander man det ikke med lort. Det rene bliver ikke bare mindre rent, det bliver rent faktisk at sammenligne med lort. Hvis der er en af de mange grafer, som kan afspejle virkeligheden bliver et gennemsnit, hvor alle andre, der jo er forkerte qua de er anderledes end den rigtige, regnes med forkert.

De runde og trekantede felter afspejler henholdsvis ballonmålinger (måleinstrumenter, der er sendt op gennem atmosfæren med ballon) og satellit målinger.

Og slutteligt markerer de skrevne felter klimarapporternes udgivelse og den tiltro de har haft til deres teori. Og som man kan se er tiltroen til at temperaturen går op blevet stærkere jo længere tid der er gået, hvor temperaturen ikke er gået op.

Den ellers klimatro Berkeley forsker udi klimarelaterede emner Jane Long indrømmer også problemerne med FN’s klimamodellers evne til at forudsige klimaet ifølge Media Research Center

“We’ve gotten worse … We don’t know, any more, with any more precision. We know with less precision how much warming will occur for a doubling of carbon dioxide concentration in the atmosphere. That means we can say we want to reduce by 20 percent or 80 percent and therefore, we’ll keep it under two degrees. We don’t know that.”

She still advocated reducing carbon emissions and claimed it would help. Host Josh Zepps summed up her point saying, “the predictions are getting worse rather than better.” Long referred to the declining accuracy of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) forecasts. The left uses these models to aggressively attack opponents whom they insultingly label “climate deniers.”

Judith Curry spørger hvilke implikationer klimamodellernes diskrepans med virkeligheden skaber?

hawkins

Panel b) indicates that the IPCC views the implications to be that some climate models have a CO2 sensitivity too high — they lower the black vertical bar (indicating the likely range from climate models) to account for this.  And they add the ad hoc red stippled range, which has a slightly lower slope and lowered range  that is consistent with the magnitude of the current model/obs discrepancy.  The implication seems that the expected warming over the last decade is lost, but future warming will continue at the expected (albeit slightly lower) pace.

The existence of disagreement between climate model predictions and observations doesn’t provide any insight in itself to why the disagreement exists, i.e. which aspect(s) of the model are inadequate, owing to the epistemic opacity of knowledge codified in complex models.

Hun citerer Matt Briggs der minder om at en teori der kun taler om muligheder (probabilistic) aldrig kan falsificeres, men at modellerne vil miste deres relevans som årtierne slægter på uden opvarmning. Og hvad skal så fodre vores angst

Welcome To Belgistan — The New Muslim Capital Of Europe

Multikultur, islam — Drokles on November 4, 2013 at 3:36 am

Muslimsk moralpoliti i London

Londonistan, Multikultur, islam — Drokles on November 1, 2013 at 4:55 am

Disse billeder, som Daily Beast viser, er fra London. Der bor også mennesker i vores samfund,  der er underlagt muslimsk kontrol. Og vi bliver stadigt flere!

An American student has been attacked by an Asian gang while out drinking beer with friends, in an area of East London where Muslim patrols have previously attempted to enforce sharia law.

Francesco Hounye, 22, who lives in Florida, was beaten savagely by the men who surrounded him, who kicked and punched him before smashing the bottle of beer into his face. Hounye was taken to hospital with deep slash wounds to his head. He has suffered permanent scarring and a chipped tooth.

The attack took place in an area where police say self-appointed “Muslim patrols” have been operating. The men have allegedly targeted gay Londoners, drinkers and women they consider to be dressed inappropriately.

Monokultur kører på WordPress