Ceci n’est pas un chat

Diverse — Drokles on January 31, 2013 at 5:16 pm

skc3a6rmbillede-2013-01-31-kl-160218

Fra Södermanlands Nyheter

En man från Vagnhärad misstänks för djurplågeri sedan han enligt en polisanmälan har poserat på bild med ett avhugget katthuvud.

På bilden syns totalt fyra män, enligt den polisanmälan som upprättades i Östergötland men nu har skickats över till polisen i Nyköping. En av männen håller upp ett avhugget katthuvud, och en annan man håller i en kniv och i kattkroppen.

Enligt polisanmälan är den man som håller i katthuvudet identisk med en man som bor i Vagnhärad. Han misstänks därför för djurplågeri.

Bilden har skickats in till polisen. De tre övriga personerna på bilden är okända för anmälaren. Hur anmälaren har kommit över bilden framgår inte.

Det er ikke en kat, men et præludium for os vantro.

“Pausen” i den globale opvarmning nærmer sig hastigt officiel erkendelse II

Diverse — Drokles on January 29, 2013 at 7:08 pm

Erkendelsen af at den globale temperatur ikke er steget de seneste 15 års tid spreder sig for tiden. Det største tyskspogede nyhedsmagasin Der Spiegel havde i ugens løb en større artikel om ‘pausen’ i opvarmingen. Spiegels artikel giver mulighed for den etablerede videnskab at komme med sine bud på, hvorfor temperaturen er stoppet med at stige, men den slår fast at det nu er gængs viden. Man kalder det forsigtigt en pause for at holde liv i drømmen om katastrofen, der kan stoppe kapitalismen. Morfar er ikke død, han sover bare. Her er et uddrag fra Global Warming Policy Foundations oversættelse af Spiegels artikel, Klimawandel: Forscher rätseln über Stillstand bei Erderwärmung.

Flowers are blooming earlier, sea level is rising – no doubt the climate is changing. The last year, as reported by NASA, was the ninth warmest since measurements began 132 years ago. The past decade was the warmest in this period.

But it has become common knowledge for some time that the climate has recently developed differently than predicted. The warming has stalled for 15 years; the upward trend in the average global temperature has not continued since 1998 (sic). “The standstill has led to the suggestion that global warming has stopped,” NASA admit.

The British Met Office has recently forecast that the warming standstill could continue until the end of 2017 – despite the rapid increase in greenhouse gas emissions. Then global warming would have stalled for 20 years. How many years – goes a now common question – has the temperature standstill to last until climate scientists start to reconsider their forecasts of future warming?

IPCC meeting

Scientists previously thought 14 years without further warming could be brought into line with their forecasts – but not “15 years or more,” as NASA scientists stated four years ago in the journal “Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society”. In an email to colleagues a renowned scientist wrote on 7 May 2009, at a time when the warming standstill had already lasted for eleven years: “the ‘no upward trend’ has to continue for a total of 15 years before we get worried.”

Now, 15 years without warming has happened. The warming standstill of the global surface temperature shows that the uncertainties of climate predictions are surprisingly large. The interested public anxiously awaits whether the IPCC’s new Assessment Report, which is due in September, will address the warming pause – the discussions are ongoing in Australia’s Hobart. The researchers are discussing several cogent reasons that might have slowed the upward trend of temperatures.

Den store diskussion om årsagerne til den manglende opvarmning afslører først og fremmest at diskussionen ikke er død, som det ellers var blevet så populært at hævde. Det er væsentligt for klimapanelets rapporter gjorde to ord uhyre populære blandt deres tilhængere i medier, det politiske univers, forskere, virksomheder og organisationer, nemlig unequivocal og unprecedented, ubetvivleligt og uden fortilfælde. Begge dele er altså forkert og de der har troet og sagt sådan har taget fejl, ikke deres kritikere. Autoriteten er udhulet. Nu engagerer de sig så modvilligt i den svære balancegang at placere skylden for den manglende opvarmning på den natur de hvædede at vide mere end rigeligt om uden også at tillæge den æren for den opvarmning som har været i gang siden lille istid. for jo mere Naturen kan have hæmmet varmen jo mere tiltror man den også selv at stå bag.

Tilbagetoget sker på flere fronter blandt eksperterne. Et norsk forskerhold har med statens velsignelse (den der betaler orkestret bestemmer jo også musikken) cumputersimuleret sig frem til at klimaets undergang sker væsentligt mere behersket end FN’s klimapanel ellers har simuleret sig frem til. Express skriver

GLOBAL warming is likely to be less extreme than claimed, researchers said yesterday. The most likely temperature rise will be 1.9C (3.4F) compared with the 3.5C predicted by the Intergovern­mental Panel on Climate Change.

The Norwegian study says earlier predictions were based on rapid warming in the Nineties. But Oslo University’s department of geosciences included data since 2000 when temperature rises “levelled off nearly completely”.

Professor Terje Berntsen said: “The Earth’s mean temperature rose sharply during the ­Nineties. This may have caused us to overestimate climate sensitivity. We are most likely witnessing natural fluctuations in the climate system – changes that can occur over several decades – and which are coming on top of a long-term warming.” He insisted, though, that his study did not justify “complacency” about human-induced global warming.

Den store konklusion er igen at diskussionen er vidt åben, at forskerne ikke er sikre i deres sag, ensige enige. Imens i England vejrer den næste generation af politikere da også morgenluft. London’s borgmester Boris Johnson kaster menigmands godtkøbsbetragtninger i spil i Telegraph og positionernerer sig til fremtidens opgør med de, der er mest syltet ind i fortidens dogmatik

…I am sitting here staring through the window at the flowerpot and the bashed-up barbecue, and I am starting to think this series of winters is not a coincidence. The snow on the flowerpot, since I have been staring, has got about an inch thicker. The barbecue is all but invisible. By my calculations, this is now the fifth year in a row that we have had an unusual amount of snow; and by unusual I mean snow of a kind that I don’t remember from my childhood: snow that comes one day, and then sticks around for a couple of days, followed by more.

I remember snow that used to come and settle for just long enough for a single decent snowball fight before turning to slush; I don’t remember winters like this. Two days ago I was cycling through Trafalgar Square and saw icicles on the traffic lights; and though I am sure plenty of readers will say I am just unobservant, I don’t think I have seen that before. I am all for theories about climate change, and would not for a moment dispute the wisdom or good intentions of the vast majority of scientists.

But I am also an empiricist; and I observe that something appears to be up with our winter weather, and to call it “warming” is obviously to strain the language. I see from the BBC website that there are scientists who say that “global warming” is indeed the cause of the cold and snowy winters we seem to be having.

(…)

I am speaking only as a layman who observes that there is plenty of snow in our winters these days, and who wonders whether it might be time for government to start taking seriously the possibility — however remote — that Corbyn is right. If he is, that will have big implications for agriculture, tourism, transport, aviation policy and the economy as a whole. Of course it still seems a bit nuts to talk of the encroachment of a mini ice age.

But it doesn’t seem as nuts as it did five years ago. I look at the snowy waste outside, and I have an open mind.

Og nu er det altså også legitimt at sætte ord på sit åbne sind.

Klimaets nye normal er rædselsfuld

Diverse — Drokles on January 26, 2013 at 11:05 am

Forleden blev det halvofficielt at den globale opvarmning “holder pause” på 16. år da den engelske meterologiske institut MET, nedjusterede deres forventninger for de næste 4 år, så den forventede pause nu kan løbe over hele to årtier. Længe har den etablerede holdning ellers været at temperaturen ikke var stoppet med at stige (så beskedent den stigning ellers var i første omgang), men nu anerkendes det altså omend som en pause, hvis forklaring endnu er ukendte naturlige faktorer, af hvilke man ellers hidtil har udtalt sig om med ubetvivlelig sikkerhed. Peter C Glover minder i The Commentator om at denne uhyre menneskeligt fremdrevne overdrevne frygt allerede har haft store økonomiske konsekvenser

Within a year of the assessment, the UK passed its infamous Climate Act, the first of its kind in the world. It was widely touted as the “most expensive legislation in history”. The Act effectively committed the UK to foot an annual extra ‘de-carbonising’ spending bill of over £18 billion every year for the next 40 years. It’s the kind of government spending action the UN IPCC is urging on all governments, especially in the developed world, even in the face of the current global economic crisis.

But the simple fact is that the UK Met Office’s predictive credibility beyond assessing the next few days’ weather prospects has long been a national laughing stock. There was the farce of its warning over a “barbecue summer” prior to one of the UK’s coolest summers for decades. Then more than one warning about warming-induced perennial drought conditions just before the UK experienced extended periods of rainy weather causing major flooding.

As long-time critic of the Met Office Paul Hudson points out, “In the 12 years to 2011, 11 out of 12 [Met Office predictions] were too high.”

Og for Glover har MET’s problemer med forudsigelser, fortielser og benægtelsernetop sin kerne i den fejlslagne teori om CO2’s afgørende virkning på klimaet.

The UK Met Office’s Hadley Centre for Climate Research is one of a select group of four global centres upon which the UN IPCC depends, having been set up by former Hadley Centre Director John Houghton. And the downgrade calls into question the credibility of the entire ‘human-carbon-emissions-are-to-blame’ house of cards. And here’s how it adds to the growing crisis for the UN IPCC’s AGW theory.

In December, a draft of the IPCC’s fifth assessment, due for final publication in September 2013, was leaked to the press by climate sceptic Alec Rawls. Rawls had been accepted by the UN IPCC as one of its expert reviewers. The IPCC confirmed the draft was genuine while lamenting the leak. The media furor that followed, however, focused on a section of the report that suggests what some key climate scientists, including Dr Henrik Svensmark in the excellent The Chilling Stars, have said all along: that the influence of cosmic rays (the Sun) could have a greater warming influence than mankind’s emissions.

Rawls describes the relevant section as “an astounding bit of honesty, a killing admission that completely undercuts the main premise and main conclusion of the full report, revealing the dishonesty of the whole”. Given what we know of how UN IPCC administrators have, shall we say, ‘boosted’ the alarmist language of previous reports after the actual scientists went home, there’s no change there then.

Tyve år uden opvarmning mens vi leder stadig mere CO2 ud i atmosfæren oven i en økonomisk krise, der kalder politikerne til regnskab, får tvivlen til at nage. Og bedre bliver det ikke når det gamle sorte guld lokker med nye forekomster, der vil holde verden med firehjulstrækkere i nok et århundrede. Telegraph skriver om Australiens lyksaligheder

The discovery in central Australia was reported by Linc Energy to the stock exchange and was based on two consultants reports, though it is not yet known how commercially viable it will be to access the oil.

The reports estimated the company’s 16 million acres of land in the Arckaringa Basin in South Australia contain between 133 billion and 233 billion barrels of shale oil trapped in the region’s rocks.

It is likely however that just 3.5 billion barrels, worth almost $359 billion (£227 billion) at today’s oil price, will be able to be recovered.

The find was likened to the Bakken and Eagle Ford shale oil projects in the US, which have resulted in massive outflows and have led to predictions that the US could overtake Saudi Arabia as the world’s largest oil producer as soon as this year.

Med så meget kulstofbaseret brændsel til rådighed er det klart at ingen gider handle i dårlig samvittighed. Det lurer politikerne, der tøver med at kaste penge i grams på CO2 børserne, med et forventeligt resultat, som Reuters skriver

European carbon prices went into freefall on Thursday, dropping 40 percent at one point to a record low 2.81 euros, after members of the EU Parliament’s industry committee voted against a plan to rescue the ailing market.

Alt er rædselsfuldt, skriver David Roberts, og nævner bl.a sin skuffelse over at Washington Post svigter sit klimastandpunkt når deres leder opmuntrer “Obama to approve the Keystone XL pipeline“, en økonomisk, som politisk nødvendighed, der svinger om den samme akse der også har fået solen til at skinne på Arizonas fornuft

Remember when I wrote, late last year, that a crucial showdown over clean-energy was taking place in Arizona? That Arizonans elect the members of the public utilities commission and that three far-right nutjobs were running against three clean-energy Democrats?

Well, all three of the nutjobs won. The Arizona Corporation Commission (the state’s PUC) is now entirely Republican. And sure enough, it just slashed incentives for home solar and eliminated incentives for commercial solar.

Incentives er andre menneskers skattekroner, hvis nogen kunne være i tvivl. Roberts kommer med et nedslående klarsyn for alle de mennesker, der svinger ind og ud af frygt for klimaforandringer; “when the public says it “believes” in climate change, it doesn’t understand climate change.”. Hvor sandt, men han overser, at det er ham selv og andre af klimaangstens advokater der ikke har forstået “klimaforandringerne” når han sorgløst sparker den ellers ubetvivlelige dør ind til den rene kaotiske uforudsigelighed med; “if we enter a few years with unseasonably cool temperatures or low storm activity, which is entirely possible”. Ekspertisen’s argumenterer nu ud fra uvidenhed.

Og som om det ikke var nok at den accelererende udledning af CO2 ikke har givet ændringer i snart 20 år, så ser det nu ud til at CO2 endda er blevet effektivt bistået af en anden menneskeudledt forureningskilde, nemlig sod. Fra The Economist

SOOT—also known as black carbon—heats up the atmosphere because it absorbs sunlight. Black things do. That is basic physics. But for years the institutions that focus on climate policy have played down the role of pollutants such as black carbon that stay in the atmosphere for a short time, and concentrated on carbon dioxide, which, once generated, tends to remain there. That may soon change.

On January 15th, the fifth day that smog-darkened Beijing’s air-quality index was registering “hazardous” (see article), the most comprehensive study of black carbon yet conducted was published in the Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. It concluded that the stuff was the second-most-damaging greenhouse agent after CO2 and about twice as bad for the climate as had been thought until now. The implications are profound.

Ja, implikationerne er store for det vil med andre ord sige at CO2 skal dele en god del af sin andel af den temperaturstigning, der ikke har været til stede de seneste snart 20 år, med sod i kampen om at være den afgørende “forcing”. Det er rædselsfuldt.

Europæisk hykleri

Israel, Satire, islam — Drokles on January 20, 2013 at 1:31 pm

Ron Agam skriver i Algemeiner om hykleriet i europæernes syn på Israel

France is now going to war in Mali because it says “we cannot have a terrorist state at the door of Europe,” but when Israel launches a defensive operation to protect its citizens from missile attacks from terrorists in Gaza, all the French newspapers and television commentators scream about Israeli aggression.

The distance between Bamako and Paris: 6266km. The distance between Gaza and Israel: 1km.

This situation starkly exposes the hypocrisy of the Europeans in their attitudes toward Israel, which drives me insane.

I samme ånd fortæller denne satiretegning af en impotent Hollande, der med utilstrækkelige midler forsøger at slukke en regulære brandtrussel også en anden historie, end vi er vant til når Israel forsvarer sine grænser

“Pausen” i den globale opvarmning nærmer sig hastigt officiel erkendelse

Diverse — Drokles on January 16, 2013 at 6:54 am

Forrige år offentliggjorde den engelske avis Daily Mail en graf på baggrund af det engelske meterologiske institut MET, der viste at den globale temperatur ikke var steget de sidste 15 år. Sidste år gjorde de det igen, blot havde den manglende temperaturstigning nu varet i 16 år.

skc3a6rmbillede-2013-01-16-kl-045727

Begge gange vakte det en del vrede og benægtlse i det klimahysteriske miljø og MET påpegede at de intet havde med grafen at gøre. Sandt var det da også at Daily Mail selv havde udfærdiget grafen, men de havde gjort det på baggrunde af data, som MET diskret offentliggør når virkeligheden tegner sig anderledes end spådommene. Men truth will out, som de siger derovre og nu har MET måttet revidere deres barske forudsigelser om den nærmeste fremtid, meget til især Daily Mail’s store begejstring

But then last week, the rest of the media caught up with our report. On Tuesday, news finally broke of a revised Met Office ‘decadal forecast’, which not only acknowledges the pause, but predicts it will continue at least until 2017. It says world temperatures are likely to stay around 0.43 degrees above the long-term average – as by then they will have done for 20 years.

This is hugely significant. It amounts to an admission that earlier forecasts – which have dictated years of Government policy and will cost tens of billions of pounds – were wrong. They did not, the Met Office now accepts, take sufficient account of  ‘natural variability’ – the effects of phenomena such as ocean temperature cycles – which at least for now are counteracting greenhouse gas warming.

Surely the Met Office would trumpet this important news, as it has done when publishing warnings of imminent temperature rises. But there was no fanfare. Instead, it issued the revised forecast on the ‘research’ section of its website – on Christmas Eve. It only came to light when it was noticed by an eagle-eyed climate blogger, and then by the Global Warming Policy Foundation, the think-tank headed by Lord Lawson.

Med det ind mente er det mere end småkomisk at læse at “København skal redde New York fra druknedøden“. “Overborgmester Frank Jensen skal stå i spidsen for globalt storbynetværk om grøn vækst - og lære newyorkerne at sikre sig mod oversvømmelser“. “The wheels are in motion”, som de siger i Yes Minister når den store forvaltningsmaskine  gøre en udvikling uafvendelig og sætte modparten ud af spillet. Politikere, medier og forskningsmiljøers alliance med rød-grønne organisationer af forskelligt tilsnit har skabt et imponerende bæst, der næsten lever sit eget, men også kun næsten. Dets liv næres af en tyrkertro på at skæbnen står for døren og den bruger enorme økonomiske ressourcer på at erstatte arbejde med aktivitet.

Men alt det er efterhånden udhulet til de sidste parodiske 1. maj parader i Rumænien eller Albanien. Skæbnen har stået og tøvet for døren for længe til at man gider tage den alvorligt og den økonomiske smalhals fører til en mere kritisk revision af udgifterne. Ingen er interesseret i at optræde i TV3’s Luksusfælden. Vi har ikke længere råd til at forfølge tant og fjas, mens virkelighedens problemer tårner sig op.

Daily Mail scorer gode point på deres historie, hvor de årligt ydmyger en prestigefyldt statslig organisation og udstiller dens slet skjulte dagsordner. En historie der rammer lige ned i de mest basale folkelige skepsis om at blive løjet for og om offentligt overforbrug. Skandalen lurer. Det er for godt til at andre medier ikke vil følge op om føje tid.

Lige børn leger best II

Diverse — Drokles on January 15, 2013 at 7:16 am

Information har den ’skæve’ vinkel på integrationsdebatten og fokuserer på de succeshistorier, som kun kræver en mindre gravergruppe at finde i skolesystemet. I deres seneste artikel “Fri os fra fra at være anderledes” kan man bagvendt læse en del sandheder om det multietniske samfunds fallit og hvorfor det ville være bedst med en massiv repatriering af de muslimske masser.

Trods læreres, forældres og skoleledelsers intentioner om at skabe en inkluderende skole, er det svært at undgå, at tosprogede elever bliver opfattet som svage elever. De tosprogede elever retter endda selv skylden mod deres egen etnicitet, hvis de ser danske elever klare sig bedre. Det viser erfaringerne fra studier af etniske minoritetsbørn lavet af Laura Gilliam, der er antropolog og lektor ved Institut for Uddannelse og Pædagogik (DPU) ved Aarhus Universitet.

»På en skole, hvor de velstillede danske børn klarede sig bedre end de etniske minoritetselever, var der en tendens blandt børnene til at betragte etniciteten som en årsag. Det spillede ikke nær så stor en rolle på den anden skole, hvor de var mere socialt ligestillede. Den sociale homogenitet gjorde, at flere etniske minoritetsbørn oplevede at klare sig godt, og derfor så de ikke faglige resultater som afhængige af etnicitet,« siger Laura Gilliam.

(…)

»Vores resultater skyldes først og fremmest et stærkt fokus på faglighed, god kontakt til forældrene og fokus på efteruddannelse til lærerne,« fortæller skoleleder Mahmad Khatib. Han påpeger, at den homogene elevsammensætning også har positiv betydning for skolens gode resultater:

»Vi er en dansk skole, men for danske muslimer. Her kan eleverne holde fast i deres identitet og religion uden, at de ikke bliver mobbet eller føler sig anderledes. Derfor kan de bedre koncentrere sig om det faglige,« siger Mahmad Khatib.

(…)

»Alle erfaringer taler imod, at homogene skoler skulle være dårlige for eleverne. Grundskolen handler om dannelse og faglighed, og klarer man sig godt her, er man bedre rustet til at klare sig godt i samfundet uanset baggrund,« mener han.

(…)

På DIA Privatskole er friheden til at være sig selv også muligheden for at definere en pædagogik og disciplin, der stemmer overens med forældrenes værdier. Her må eleverne ikke medbringe slik og sodavand på skolen, forældrene skal møde op til konsultationer, og eleverne kan smides ud, hvis de er voldelige, stjæler eller udviser dårlig moral og adfærd. Det står i den kontrakt, som skal underskrives af forældrene, før børnene begynder i skole.

Det passer Jamal Rochdi glimrende. Han er far til Sabrine på 10 år, der sidste år skiftede fra Brøndby Strand Skole til 4.a på DIA Privatskole.

»Der var alt for meget ballade og problemer med mobning, og det fik aldrig nogen konsekvenser. Sabrine tog det med hjem og havde problemer med sin mor. Hun var ked af det og hørte ikke efter, hvad vi sagde,« fortæller han om frustrationerne i hjemmet.

(…)

I undervisningen mærker lærerne fordelene ved den homogene kultur.

For venstrefløjen ville det dog være bedre med en hel befolkningsudskiftning, nu danskerne ses som problemet i deres eget land?

skc3a6rmbillede-2013-01-15-kl-055053

BBC dokumentar om Salman Rushdie affæren

Diverse — Drokles on January 13, 2013 at 3:02 am

Lige børn leger bedst

Diverse — Drokles on January 8, 2013 at 3:12 am

Information har en typisk artikel om etnisk identitet, der kun tolereres i en retning. Under overskriften “Tosproget Gymnasium Skal Få Flere Til At Tage Studentereksamen” indledes der med den gyldne erkendelse

På andre gymnasier i Danmark får mange elever med anden etnisk baggrund en identitetskrise. De har svært ved at passe ind og tager derfor en identitet på sig, der slet ikke er dem selv.«

Ordene kommer fra den 18-årige Mehmet Yilmaz, der går i 2. g på Københavns Private Gymnasium. Et gymnasium, der næsten udelukkende har elever med rødder i Tyrkiet.

»Her ligner vi allerede hinanden i det ydre, og vi har samme baggrund. Det giver mere overskud til at reflektere over sin identitet og personlighed,« fortæller Mehmet.

»Det er voldsomt som teenager, hvis man både skal stille spørgsmålstegn ved sit tøj, sit udseende, og hvem man er som person. Her er der plads til at skille sig ud, fordi vi forstår hinanden.«

Sådan er vi mange der har det, nemlig bedst med vores egne.  Danske unge på indvandrertunge skoler og gymnasier har jo også svært ved at finde deres indetitet med tænderne spredt ud på asfalten. Så når nu man bedst kan være sit eget unikke selv sammen med andre kulturelt - og tør jeg sige nationalt? - ligesindede, hvorfor er de tosprogede tyrkere så ikke sammen om at genfinde deres identitet hjemme i Tyrkiet og hvor de sidste 10% ellers kommer fra?

Sorte kriminalitetstal

Diverse — Drokles on January 4, 2013 at 9:20 pm

Det er Barak Hussein Hussein, der mobiliserer sin vælgerbase. Sorte er ofre for de hvides racisme, sorte skal stå sammen for de hvide kan ikke lide dem - and the crowd cheers. Men sandheden er at sorte er mere kriminelle og mere voldelige end hvide. Fra Pajamas Media

It is widely known but rarely mentioned that crime is higher among some demographic groups than others.  Indeed, it’s considered impolite to talk about such things, but facts are facts, and some facts bear discussion when pondering those demographic shifts.  In Los Angeles, as in the country generally, blacks commit more crimes per capita than Latinos, who commit more crimes than whites.  Thus, in those parts of Los Angeles where Latinos have supplanted blacks, crime has gone down accordingly.

When I first started working as a patrol officer in South-Central Los Angeles in the early ‘80s, there were relatively few Latinos living anywhere south of Adams Boulevard, and the farther south one went, the fewer Latinos one encountered.  But the biggest demographic shift that has occurred during my career with the LAPD has been the steady influx of Latinos into neighborhoods that were once all but exclusively black.  The decline in crime – particularly violent crime – that has accompanied this transformation is not a coincidence.

Another effect of this demographic shift lies in the under-reporting of crime.  Illegal aliens are often reluctant to report crimes to the police, this despite the many accommodations made for them in Los Angeles.  In 2010, I attended a meeting where LAPD chief Charlie Beck estimated the number of illegal aliens in the city at 600,000.  He recently put the figure at 750,000, or roughly 19 percent of the city’s population.  With this in mind, it doesn’t require a great leap of logic to conclude that some significant number of crimes in the city go unreported.

But one crime that seldom goes unreported is murder, and in this category the numbers are easily verifiable.  Los Angeles set a record for murders back in 1992, when a staggering 1,092 people came to a violent end on the city’s streets.  As of Dec. 15 of this year, the figure was 289, roughly equal to the number of murders recorded in South L.A.’s 77th Street and Southeast Divisions in 1992.

Sorte beflitter sig mere med vold og kriminalitet end andre grupper, men når man ser bort fra indignerede venstredrejede røster, der aldrig er sene til at påpege at der sidder flere sorte i fængsel end på skolebænken eller fordreje historier, som da man gjorde latinoen Zimmermann til hvid og hans selvforsvar til racistisk mord, er der tavst om sortes vold mod hvide - og hinanden. “The rate of gun ownership is higher among whites than among blacks, but the murder rate is higher among blacks.” skriver Thomas Sowell i et glimrende indlæg på National Review til fordel for borgernes ret til våben, og denne konstatering udtrykkes i al sin sørgelighed i Colin Flaherty’s White Girl Bleed A Lot, der afdækker den selvpålagte tavshed når det kommer til det, der med et misvisende begreb, kaldes omvendt racisme.

skc3a6rmbillede-2013-01-04-kl-195310

Colin Flaherty’s egen hjemmeside har en del video’er man kan deprimere sig med

DC Breaking Local News Weather Sports FOX 5 WTTG

Alex Pareene fra det venstredrejede blad Salon.com afviser, lidt overraskende fra den kant, at der er et seriøst problem med racisme i USA ud fra FBI’s officielle opgørelser over hadforbrydelser, hvor de hvide tegner sig for flere end de sorte. Pareene gør sig lystig over konservatives nyfunde angst for ’sorte’, men, som en læser minder om, glemmer han hvorledes især venstredrejede viser deres angst i “school or neighborhood choice”. Og læseren fortsætter med at citere Walter Williams uddybende tal, som giver stof til eftertanke når der skal vælges skole og boligkvarter

“Since 1972, the U.S. Department of Justice has conducted a National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) to determine the frequency of certain crimes. One category is interracial crimes. Its most recent publication (1997), “Criminal Victimization in the U.S.,” reports on data collected in 1994. In that year, there were about 1,700,000 interracial crimes, of which 1,276,030 involved whites and blacks. In 90 percent of the cases, a white was the victim and a black was the perpetrator, while in 10 percent of the cases it was the reverse.

Another finding of the NCVS report is that of the 2,025,464 violent crimes committed by blacks in 1994, 1,140,670 were against whites - that’s slightly over 56 percent. Whites committed 5,114,692 violent crimes; 135,360, or 2.6 percent were against blacks.

In 1997, there were 2,336 whites charged with anti-black crimes and 718 blacks charged with anti-white crimes, so-called hate crimes. Although the absolute number of white offenders was larger, the black rate per 100,000 of the population was greater, making blacks twice as likely to commit hate crimes.

Regardless of race, criminal violence is despicable and deserving of condemnation. But far more destructive are the official and unofficial attempts to mislead and conceal.”

Det kender vi også herhjemme fra en snart årtier lang og bitter debat.

Al Gore tjener 100 mill. på olie og løgne

Diverse — Drokles on January 4, 2013 at 4:06 pm

AL Gore har solgt sin TV kanal Current TV, til Al-Jazeera, som nu kan sende til 60 mill. amerikanske hjem. Salget til Al-Jazeera afspejler venstrefløjens indgroede lede ved deres eget land og deres egne landsmænd, som Human Events fortæller

Current rejected a buyout offer from Glenn Beck, on the grounds that “the legacy of who the network goes to is important to us, and we are sensitive to networks not aligned with our point of view.”  But they were cool with the idea of selling to Al-Jazeera.

Al Gore står til at tjene 100.000.000 $ på handlen, der kommer direkte fra undergrunden for at ende i atmosfæren

The government of Qatar gets somewhere between 60 and 70 percent of its revenue from oil and gas.  Which means the Pope of Global Warming just lined his pockets with $100 million of… oil money.

Less than half of the new “Al-Jazeera America” channel’s programming will be produced in the United States, which means Bill Clinton’s Vice-President just outsourced a bunch of jobs to a foreign company.

And the deal had to be completed in a hurry… because Al Gore wanted to avoid Barack Obama’s tax increases.

Amin Farouk præciserer på Gatestone Institute, hvor langt Al Jazeera’s dagsorden er fra Glen Beck’s

Anyone regularly watching Al-Jazeera TV in Arabic cannot help being aware of its Islamist agenda, inspired by the Muslim Brotherhood’s Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, wo is currently a resident of Qatar.

Regular viewers are familiar with the network’s biases — also apparent in its otherwise different English-language programming — in covering events in the Middle East. Its reports are stunning in their lopsided descriptions of the cruelty and oppression of Arab leaders who, because they became weak and thus vulnerable, were called by Qatar’s opportunistic rulers, “oppressive dictators whose time had come.”

Here and there are points of light, when we become aware of regional events about which we might otherwise never have known. For example, the recent exposure of Iranian terrorist cells in Yemen and the Gulf States, the accelerated progress of Iran’s nuclear agenda in the Persian Gulf, and Iran’s naval exercises designed to challenge the United States.

Al-Jazeera is not, however, a communications medium in the Western sense; it is a psychological warfare medium. Its cameras are always turned outward; they never criticize Qatar’s tyrannical, dictatorial, corrupt, plutocratic leaders or their exploitation of foreign workers, who have neither the status nor rights of Qatari nationals. Al-Jazeera’s ongoing propaganda campaign against the Arab states in the Middle East is a move chosen by the rulers of Qatar to deflect Arab, Western and effervescent local attention from what is happening in the corrupt Al-Thani family’s dark, closed emirate of wealth.

Although it promises aid to financially needy Islamic countries, it sends just the occasional pittance when t feels a need to bolster its popularity. Meanwhile huge unreported sums go to support Islamist terrorist organizations such as Hamas in the Gaza Strip and Jabhat Alnusra Al Islamiya in Syria.

(…)

Al-Jazeera deliberately hides the underground civilian swell that is trying to make its voice heard against Hamas’s theocratic and dictatorial rule. It does not broadcast the grumblings of the hungry, unemployed Gazan public against Hamas’s sectorial economic policies, which discriminate in favor of its supporters and neglect the rest of the populace; which kill and oppress Gazan Fatah activists, and which use assault rifles to enforce the norms of Sharia law on civilians, some of whom Hamas has executed on the flimsiest of pretexts.

As a TV channel, Al-Jazeera does not operate under accepted Western norms. It is a fundamentalist terrorist communications base operating under Qatari political cover, with a pretense of pluralism.

Man forstår, hvilken åndelig arv, som Al gore og hans medsammensvorne, gerne vil bevare. Men mon ikke de fleste medier fortsat vil advare mod Fox News eksistens?

Endnu et eksempel på selvcensur

Multikultur, Pressen, Satire, Ytringsfrihed, islam, muhammed — Drokles on January 3, 2013 at 10:50 pm

Det franske satiremagasin Charlie Hebdo blev ikke overraskende udsat for et mindre brandbombeattentat af muslimer, som svar på en tegnet fortælling om deres perverterede forbillede. Desværre er det heller ikke overraskende at andre publicister ikke tør stå side om side med Charlie Hebdo, hvad angår retten til at ytre sig. Således censurerer engelske Daily Mail Charlie Hebdos forside, som var det efter Allahs forskrifter, som bortset fra forræderiet også fratager læseren afgørende viden om omfanget af urimelighed i muslimernes hysteri

Targeted: The offices of Charlie Hebdo were firebombed last year after it released an edition that mocked radical Islam

Det slemme billede ser ifølge Hodjas Blog således ud

http://hodja.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/couv-mahomet_2_.jpg

Åh, det er blot arabisk retorik

Antisemitisme, Nazisme, islam, venstrefløjen — Drokles on January 3, 2013 at 8:34 pm

Jeg sad i min lille juleferie og stenede en dokumentar om Hitler på National Geographic. Her blev der trukket en lige og logisk linie fra Hitlers brændende ønske om at slå jøderne ihjel, hans taler om at slå jøderne ihjel og så at han og hans håndlangere, som det naturligste i verden slog jøderne ihjel. Konklusionen, som alle den slags dokumentarfilm kommer til er hvorledes man dog ikke i samtiden var mere opmærksom på den åbenlyse trussel fra hitlers nazibevægelse. Tjah, man kan jo blot spørge nutidens venstrefløj og salonfähige meningselite om., hvad i al verden der dog går gennem deres hoveder, når de er helt døve overfor den bølge af had der emmer fra muslimske fælleskaber.

Måske er det blot at venstrefløjen og den salonfähige meningselite bare deler muslimernes drømme.

Monokultur kører på WordPress