Racismens komplekse fortælling

Da en ung mand, Freddie Carlos Gray, mistede livet i Baltimore politis varetægt under besynderlige omstændigheder udbrød der uroligheder. Den unge mand var sort, vanekriminel ganske vist, men sort, eller i hvert fald mørk nok til at tælle med til de afroamerikanske, og mistanken om endnu en racistisk drab var derfor nok til en konklusion. Baltimore er styret af Demokraterne og har været det længe og har en sort borgmester. Politiet er 60% sort. Men da Trayvon Martin for et par år siden også blev dræbt af en hvid, eller snarere en latino og i selvforsvar, så var der et mønster.

Og dette mønster blev kun forstærket da den hvide betjent Darren Wilson dræbte den 130 kg lette teenager Michael Brown, der blidt havde skubbet den lokale asiatiske købmand omkuld og røvet en kasse cigarer. Ganske vist prøve Brown at overmande Wilson mens han truede med at slå ham ihjel, men da utroværdige vidner løj om at han havde hænderne oppe, afmægtigt appellerende “Hands up, don’t shoot!” så var det bedre en bevisets stilling. Alle løgne beviser den samme fortælling, at sorte ulykke intet har med deres adfærd at gøre, men er resultatet af et racistisk jerngreb som selv ikke Obama har kunnet hele.

“What’s weird is that it never happens to white kids” mente komikeren Chris Rock, skønt en hvid teenager var blevet skudt og dræbt at to sorte betjente nogenlunde samtidig med Freddie Gray. Michael Moore krævede på Twitter at “every African-American currently incarcerated for drug ‘crimes’ or nonviolent offenses released from prison today” og “Disarm the police. We have a 1/4 billion 2nd amendment guns in our homes 4 protection. We’ll survive til the right cops r hired”. Højrefløjen bliver aldrig træt af at minde om, at en af Moores mange livvagter er blevet anholdt for ulovlig besiddelse af et skydevåben. Identiteten med at være undertrykt neger spredte sig til forskellige byer i USA og endda helt til Israel, hvor der opstod uroligheder i den venstredrejede(!) højborg Tel Aviv. Diversitet fører grundlæggende blot til øget segregering og mistro til naboer, samfund og myndigheder.

Thomas Sowell skriver i National Review

The “legacy of slavery” argument is not just an excuse for inexcusable behavior in the ghettos. In a larger sense, it is an evasion of responsibility for the disastrous consequences of the prevailing social vision of our times, and the political policies based on that vision, over the past half century.

Anyone who is serious about evidence need only compare black communities as they evolved in the first 100 years after slavery with black communities as they evolved in the first 50 years after the explosive growth of the welfare state, beginning in the 1960s.

You would be hard-pressed to find as many ghetto riots prior to the 1960s as we have seen just in the past year, much less in the 50 years since a wave of such riots swept across the country in 1965.

We are told that such riots are a result of black poverty and white racism. But in fact — for those who still have some respect for facts — black poverty was far worse, and white racism was far worse, prior to 1960. But violent crime within black ghettos was far less. You cannot take any people, of any color, and exempt them from the requirements of civilization without ruinous consequences to them and to society at large.

Murder rates among black males were going down — repeat, down — during the much-lamented 1950s, while it went up after the much celebrated 1960s, reaching levels more than double what they had been before. Most black children were raised in two-parent families prior to the 1960s. But today the great majority of black children are raised in one-parent families.

Such trends are not unique to blacks, nor even to the United States. The welfare state has led to remarkably similar trends among the white underclass in England over the same period. Just read Life at the Bottom, by Theodore Dalrymple, a British physician who worked in a hospital in a white slum neighborhood.

You cannot take any people, of any color, and exempt them from the requirements of civilization — including work, behavioral standards, personal responsibility, and all the other basic things that the clever intelligentsia disdain — without ruinous consequences to them and to society at large.

Non-judgmental subsidies of counterproductive lifestyles are treating people as if they were livestock, to be fed and tended by others in a welfare state — and yet expecting them to develop as human beings have developed when facing the challenges of life themselves.

One key fact that keeps getting ignored is that the poverty rate among black married couples has been in single digits every year since 1994. Behavior matters and facts matter, more than the prevailing social visions or political empires built on those visions.

Som ingen fakta tilsyneladende rokker ved følelsen af identitet, rokker ingen identitet ved fakta. Anklagemyndigheden endte med at rejse tiltale mod Den mordsigtede betjent er sort, som to af de tre sigtet for manddrab, som man kan læse på Daily Mail.

a-complex-tale-of-white-supremacy

Ja, det giver unægteligt racismefortælling et lag af kompleksitet

Negerderoute II

Den sorte familie i USA er gået i opløsning i takt med først stigende civile rettigheder og siden dyrkelsen af berettigelse skrev jeg tidligere. To sørgelige videoer til illustration. Først en teenager, der grinende tager selfies mens hans egen mor og kæreste slås

Dyrkelsen af berettigelse: Obama sendte en sørgedelegation til den kriminelle Freddie Greys begravelse, men ikke til krigshelten Kris Kyles. En kvinde mener ikke hun skal betale for en flaske vand fordi hendes slægtninge engang var slaver

Optøjerne i Baltimore er venstrefløjens frugter

street-riots-in-baltimore-cover-702x336

Der hærges stadig i den amerikanske by Baltimore. Undskyldningen er en ung sort kriminel, der er død i politiets varetægt. Hillary Clinton mener at det er politiets og det juridiske systems indbyggede racisme, der er problemet i byer som Baltimore, Ferguson og alle andre steder i USA, hvor man oplever race-uro, skriver Business Insider

“There is something profoundly wrong when African-American men are still far more likely to be stopped and searched by police, charged with crimes, and sentenced to longer prison terms than are meted out to their white counterparts. There is something wrong when a third of all black men face the prospect of prison during their lifetimes,” Clinton said. “We have allowed our criminal justice system to get out of balance and these recent tragedies should galvanize us to come together as a nation to find our balance again.”

Clinton’s speech came in the wake of Monday’s racially-charged riots in Baltimore, Maryland, in which violent protesters raged after the funeral of 25-year-old Freddie Gray, who died on April 19 after suffering a fatal spinal injury in police custody. The incident is just one of a number of controversial police-involved deaths of African-American men, which protesters have attributed to a racist criminal justice system.

For her part, Clinton said she saw a “unmistakable and undeniable” pattern in their deaths.

“Yet again the family of a young black men is grieving a life cut short. Yet again the streets of an American city are marred by violence, by shattered glass, and shouts of anger and shows of force. Yet again a community is reeling, its fault lines laid bare,” she said. ”From Ferguson to Staten Island to Baltimore, the patterns have become unmistakable and undeniable.”

Som jeg henviste til forleden så har hvide amerikanere større risiko for at blive skudt af politiet end sorte - hvis man korrigere for kriminalitet! Og jeg henviste også til Daniel Greenfield, der fortalte at politiet i Baltimore er overvejende sort. Men der er tilsyneladens store problemer med politiet i Baltimore skriver Kevin D Williamson for National Review

Would any sentient adult American be shocked to learn that Baltimore has a corrupt and feckless police department enabled by a corrupt and feckless city government? I myself would not, and the local authorities’ dishonesty and stonewalling in the death of Freddie Gray is reminiscent of what we have seen in other cities. There’s a heap of evidence that the Baltimore police department is pretty bad.

This did not come out of nowhere. While the progressives have been running the show in Baltimore, police commissioner Ed Norris was sent to prison on corruption charges (2004), two detectives were sentenced to 454 years in prison for dealing drugs (2005), an officer was dismissed after being videotaped verbally abusing a 14-year-old and then failing to file a report on his use of force against the same teenager (2011), an officer was been fired for sexually abusing a minor (2014), and the city paid a quarter-million-dollar settlement to a man police illegally arrested for the non-crime of recording them at work with his mobile phone. There’s a good deal more. Does that sound like a disciplined police organization to you

Og han går skridtet videre: “Unless I’m reading the charts wrong, the Baltimore city council is 100 percent Democratic”.

The other Democratic monopolies aren’t looking too hot, either. We’re sending Atlanta educators to prison for running a criminal conspiracy to hide the fact that they failed, and failed woefully, to educate the children of that city. Isolated incident? Nope: Atlanta has another cheating scandal across town at the police academy. Who is being poorly served by the fact that Atlanta’s school system has been converted into crime syndicate? Mostly poor, mostly black families. Who is likely to suffer from any incompetents advanced through the Atlanta police department by its corrupt academy? Mostly poor, mostly black people. Who suffers most from the incompetence of Baltimore’s Democratic mayor? Mostly poor, mostly black families — should they feel better that she’s black? Who suffers most from the incompetence and corruption of Baltimore’s police department? Mostly poor, mostly black families.

And it’s the same people who will suffer the most from the vandalism and pillaging going on in Baltimore, too.

The evidence suggests very strongly that the left-wing, Democratic claques that run a great many American cities — particularly the poor and black cities — are not capable of running a school system or a police department. They are incompetent, they are corrupt, and they are breathtakingly arrogant. Cleveland, Philadelphia, Detroit, Baltimore — this is what Democrats do.

Ifølge Atlantas Derek Thomsen presses middelklassen ud af byerne jo mere venstredrejet boligpolitik der føres. Men måske er der andre grunde, skriver Lloyd Marcis i American Thinker. Den sorte befolkning overrepræsentation i kriminalstatistikkerne er ikke en følge af racismen, men af at sorte generelt opfører sig asocialt. Og det gør de bl.a fordi deres identitet er en mod-identitet, der hviler på at de er undertrykt og i deres undertrykkelse uden ansvar for deres opførsel

How do you expect black youths to react to the Left’s orchestrated campaign to convince them that white Republicans and conservatives are racist and out to get them, that white cops murder them at will, that  the rich got rich stealing from them, and that business owners are selfish and evil?

These lies have been sold to black youths by the highest black voices in the country — Obama, Oprah, Sharpton, Holder, Jackson, the NAACP, the Congressional Black Caucus, and assorted other race exploiting scumbags. …if I sound angry, it is because I am.

Det var Baltimores egen sorte og demokratiske borgmester, der gav bøller og vandaler fripas - space to destroy - til at smadre Baltimores skattebetalende næringsdrivende forretninger.

Som blommen i et æg

Akademia, Demografi, Diverse, Forbrydelse og straf, Race, Racisme, USA, venstrefløjen — Drokles on April 29, 2015 at 4:56 am

Komikeren Amer Rahman udlægger har sin forståelse af, hvilke racismeprivilegier alle ikke-hvide har fået af den hvide mands århundrede lange undertrykkelse.

Men intet er så bizart at det ikke kan være en akademisk disciplin. Aeman Ansari forklarer Huffington Posts læsere, hvorfor farvede har brug for ’sikre rum’, hvor hvide er forment adgang.

It’s not just important, but it’s essential, for marginalized groups to have safe spaces on campus to engage with people who understand what they go through. Though this group is funded by Ryerson’s student union, it works to serve a particular group and a particular purpose. Many students at Ryerson have encountered racism in their life that is impossible to forget and many are exposed to discrimination on a daily basis. This group and these sort of events allow people of colour to lay bare their experiences and to collectively combat this societal ailment. These spaces are rare places in the world not controlled by individuals who have power, who have privilege.
These spaces, which are forums where minority groups are protected from mainstream stereotypes and marginalization, are crucial to resistance of oppression and we, as a school and as a society, need to respect them.
(…)
Segregation was imposed on people of colour by people of privilege, not the other way around. The very fact that individuals organizing to help each other get through social barriers and injustices are being attacked and questioned for their peaceful assembly is proof that they were right to exclude those students.
Racialized people experience systemic discrimination on a daily basis, on many levels, and in ways that white people may never encounter. The whole point of these safe spaces is to remove that power dynamic. That’s partly what makes them spaces for healing.
(…)
The West has a history of oppressing people of colour: from Africans who were enslaved and brought to the New World, to native people whose land was stolen by Europeans. This kind of oppression is still witnessed today, in the way the black community is treated in the United States, in the state of African nations trying to recover from the collapse of the previous colonial rule, and in the continuing struggles of indigenous peoples.

Man kunne argumentere for at der var en sammenblanding af det offentlige rum og det private. Men nok om semantik; Baltimores borgmester Stephanie Rawlings-Blake tror nemlig også på at sorte skal have et ’sikre rum’ fra hvide. Tilsyneladende under samme opfattelse som football spilleren Richard Sherman af at bølle og nigger er et og det samme bad hun, ifølge Daily Caller, derfor politiet (’whithey’, ‘the man’, eller måske ‘da man’) om at sikre et rum til de demonstranter, der var kede af en narkokriminels utidige død og som havde lyst til at hærge nabolaget

I’ve made it very clear that I work with the police, and instructed them to do everything that they could to make sure that the protesters could exercise their right to free speech. It’s a very delicate balancing act because while we tried to make sure they were protected from the cars and the other things that were going on, we gave those who wished to destroy space to do that, as well. And we worked very hard to keep that balance and to put ourselves in the best position to deescalate. And that’s what you saw.

Suspect Dies Baltimore

Måske de lokale føler sig en kende svigtet? Men, viser det sig, Baltimore faktisk er et rimeligt sikkert rum for farvede, skriver Daniel Greenfield for Frontpage Magazine

Baltimore has the fifth highest big city murder rate in the country. The four cities ahead of it are Detroit, New Orleans, Newark and St. Louis. All these cities have something in common. Not racism, but race.

The killers and the dead are black.

The murder rate in Baltimore stood at 37.4 to 100,000 people. There have already been 63 murders this year. Fifty-six of the victims were black. Of the 16 murders in the last 30 days, 14 of the victims were black.

(…)

Baltimore’s peaceful protests were marred by smashing cars, smashing windows, throwing rocks and assaulting random people still showing their white faces in the city. The police tried to stay out of it giving the protesters and their supporters what they really wanted; the opportunity to commit crimes without being held accountable.

(…)

Baltimore has a black mayor, a black police commissioner and a majority non-white police force. Driving out the remaining white police officers will just eliminate the race card excuse for future riots.

Studies have shown that black officers are harder on black suspects and that cops already hesitate more before shooting black suspects than white suspects. The Detroit police force is 63% black. Federal oversight over it ended only recently. The Philadelphia police force has more blacks on it than any other racial group; it also has a high rate of police shootings and was targeted by the Justice Department.

(…)

In 2013, 2,245 black people were killed by other black people. Only 189 were killed by whites. In 2012, 2,412 black people were killed by other black people. That’s tens of thousands dead over a decade.

There have been genocides with lower death tolls.

Måske er hvidt selskab det sikreste rum for en neger.

Obamas har ikke helet USA

Der var høje forventninger til Barak hussein Obama, da han blev valgt til USAs præsident. Kansas City Stars Mary Sanchez formulerede forhåbningerne således i 2008

On race, however, Obama only has to show up. That’s how it works to be the first minority to achieve any high-profile role. It is a strange phenomenon. Simply by standing in a space long held by the same sorts of people - namely, white men - something shifts in the cosmos. Years ago, when Kansas City, Mo., elected its first black mayor, Emanuel Cleaver (now a member of Congress), some compared his impact on city race relations to the effect a teacher has by standing on the playground at recess. The kids play differently - more nicely. Point being that simply being in the room takes things up a notch.

Nu har han så været her en del år og spændingerne er siden kun steget. Der har været flere prominente sager, hvor ‘race-baiters’ har opviglet sorte masser og venstrefløjen i deciderede racekampe. Overraskende har man taget udgangspunkt i enddog meget dårlige sager, hvis man ville demonstrere et racistisk hvidt USA, der undertrykker den sorte befolkning. Først i rækken var sagen om den jødisk-mexikanske George Zimmerman, der en sen aften i selvforsvar dræbte den sorte Trayvon Martin. Trayvon Martin dyrkede et afsindigt had til hvide, drak sig høj på Watermelon Lean og var blevet bortvist flere gange fra sin skole på grund af tyveri og konflikter. Den skæbnesvangre aften havde Zimmerman, der var med i et frivilligt lokalt vagtværn, set Trayvon Martin opføre sig mistænkeligt.

Obama undlod blot at være til stede med sin fredsskabende sorthed og pustede istedet til fortællingen om et racistisk mord ved at påstå at det kunne være hans egen søn, der blev skudt. Og derefter blev der imod politiets og den lokale statsanklagers vilje, rejst en sag mod Zimmerman. Zimmerman, der op til retsagen tog 30 kg på, blev renset for alle anklager, men ikke for mistanken. Hans liv siden har været præget af angst og paranoia og han har haft flere voldelige sammenstød med både familie og politiet.

Det samme mønster gentog sig i byen Ferguson, da en hvid betjent, Darren Wilson, skød og dræbte den sorte Michael Brown på åben gade. Brown blev i medierne kaldt the gentle giant og der opstod hurtigt et hysterisk pres for at få Wilson anklaget og dømt for mord. Den lokale anklager valgte stik imod bevisernes substans at give efter for presset ved at holde en udvidet høring, så offentligheden kunne for syn for sagn. Wilson blev pure frifundet. The Gentle Gian havde angrebet Wilson og truet med at slå ham ihjel. Inden da havde han røvet en kasse cigarer fra en lokal forretning - den blev senere brændt ned under pøblens rasende anklager om forrædderi. Sagens beviser kunne ikke ændre hverken mediernes eller pøblens fortælling. Og i marts i år blev to betjente skudt ned i Ferguson i et attentat - begge overlevede.

“I want to see a cop shoot a white unarmed teenager in the back” er Guardians Toni Morrison som svar på, hvornår racespændingerne forsvinder. Men ifølge Washington Times så er det krav allerede mere end indfriet

Based on that data, Mr. Moskos reported that roughly 49 percent of those killed by officers from May 2013 to April 2015 were white, while 30 percent were black. He also found that 19 percent were Hispanic and 2 percent were Asian and other races.

His results, posted last week on his blog Cop in the Hood, arrived with several caveats, notably that 25 percent of the website’s data, which is drawn largely from news reports, failed to show the race of the person killed.

Killed by Police lists every death, justified or not, including those in which the officer had been wounded or acted in self-defense.

“The data doesn’t indicate which shootings are justified (the vast majority) and which are cold-blooded murder (not many, but some). And maybe that would vary by race. I don’t know, but I doubt it,” Mr. Moskos said on his blog.

Adjusted to take into account the racial breakdown of the U.S. population, he said black men are 3.5 times more likely to be killed by police than white men. But also adjusted to take into account the racial breakdown in violent crime, the data actually show that police are less likely to kill black suspects than white ones.

“If one adjusts for the racial disparity in the homicide rate or the rate at which police are feloniously killed, whites are actually more likely to be killed by police than blacks,” said Mr. Moskos, a former Baltimore cop and author of the book “Cop in the Hood.”

“Adjusted for the homicide rate, whites are 1.7 times more likely than blacks die at the hands of police,” he said. “Adjusted for the racial disparity at which police are feloniously killed, whites are 1.3 times more likely than blacks to die at the hands of police.”

Mr. Moskos listed two possible reasons for the racial disparity. The first is that police assigned to largely black neighborhoods face “more political fallout when they shoot, and thus receive better training and are less inclined to shoot.”

The second is that police assigned to black communities with high crime rates are more accustomed to dangerous situations and thus are more likely to be able to resolve them without resort to lethal force.

Figures on police shootings by race are thin on the ground, but Mr. Moskos’s results have some support: The investigative journalism website ProPublica came up with a similar percentage in an Oct. 10 article, reporting that 44 percent of all those killed by police were white, using FBI data from 1980 to 2012.

The fact-checking website PolitiFact concluded in August 2014 that police kill more whites than blacks after the claim was made by conservative commentator Michael Medved. PolitiFact cited data from the Centers for Disease Control on fatal injuries by “legal intervention” from 1999 to 2011.

“Over the span of more than a decade, 2,151 whites died by being shot by police compared to 1,130 blacks. In that respect, Medved is correct,” said PolitiFact.

But PolitiFact gave his assertion a “half true” rating because whites make up 63 percent of the population, while blacks make up just 12 percent.

“Yes, more whites than blacks die as a result of an encounter with police, but whites also represent a much bigger chunk of the total population,” PolitiFact said in its Aug. 21 post.

But PolitiFact did not take into account the percentage of those by race involved in violent crime or shootings of police, as Mr. Moskos did.

Despite the recent flood of media coverage involving police shootings, Mr. Moskos advised his readers to “keep all this morbidity in perspective,” reminding them that very few people, white or black, will ever be shot or killed by police.

“The odds that any given black man will shoot and kill a police officer in any given year is slim to none, about one in a million. The odds for any given white man? One in four million,” he said. “The odds that a black man will be shot and killed by a police officer is about 1 in 60,000. For a white man those odds are 1 in 200,000.”

I Baltimore forleden forfaldt en protestdemonstration over Freddie Grays, en sort amerikaner, utidige død i politiets varetægt, i kaos og plyndringer. Det er Obamas time for healing

Forsvaret af hvide privilegier

USA Today skriver at mangfoldighedskulturen er ved at tage helt overhånd helt ind i de amerikanske væbnede styrker

Army officials are investigating a diversity training briefing at Fort Gordon, Ga., in which a slide about “white privilege” was inappropriately shown to soldiers, according to an Army spokeswoman

The Equal Opportunity briefing took place Thursday for about 400 soldiers of the 67th Signal Battalion, Capt. Lindsay Roman, an Army spokeswoman, said Friday. The slide titled “The Luxury of Obliviousness” has bullet-point items about “white privilege.”

One item reads, “Race privilege gives whites little reason to pay a lot of attention to African Americans or to how white privilege affects them. ‘To be white in America means not having to think about it.’ ”

An image of the slide appeared later Thursday on a Facebook page and generated a torrent of negative comments about political correctness run amok.

Huffington Post beskriver, hvad ”white privilege” er

After one reads McIntosh’s powerful essay, it’s impossible to deny that being born with white skin in America affords people certain unearned privileges in life that people of other skin colors simply are not afforded. For example:

“I can turn on the television or open to the front page of the paper and see people of my race widely represented.”

“When I am told about our national heritage or about ‘civilization,’ I am shown that people of my color made it what it is.”

“If a traffic cop pulls me over or if the IRS audits my tax return, I can be sure I haven’t been singled out because of my race.”

“I can if I wish arrange to be in the company of people of my race most of the time.”

If you read through the rest of the list, you can see how white people and people of color experience the world in very different ways.

Som man kan se, er det skruen uden ende ved at insistere på at virkeligheden er krænkende og forskellighed kun er undertrykkelse. så langt man har en anderledes fremtoning er man så meget desto mindre eksotisk. Historien er at hvide europæere skabte menneskets morderne civilisation. Og sorte er bare ikke knyttet til arbejdsmarkedet.

Everyday Feminism har en forklarende tegneserie, hvis streg er passende for den barnlige tankegang

white-privilege-6

Den sørgelige sandhed er at straffeloven i USA sigter på adfærd og at denne statistik viser hvor forskellige sorte og hvide opfører sig. Trods alle anstrengelser for ikke at tænke ilde bogens forside, så kan man selvfølgelig ikke undgå en mindre selvforstærkende effekt når folk fra hele det politisk spekter, ved hvem statistikken tilsiger udgør en potentiel fare mod ens helbred og ejendom. Men virkeligheden former tanker mere end tanker former virkelighed. Under alle omstændigheder, så er dette bavl blot en dårlig undskyldning for at give ordet til Bill Whittle

Ferguson: To betjente skudt

To politibetjente i den amerikanske by Ferguson er blevet skudt skriver Daily Mail

Two police officers have been shot outside the police headquarters in Ferguson where the shooting of a black teenager by a white officer sparked a wave of angry protests across the U.S. last year.

Gunfire erupted during protests following the resignation of Ferguson Police Chief Thomas Jackson late last night as angry scuffles broke out between officers and the public.

A 32-year-old officer from nearby Webster Groves was shot in the face and a 41-year-old officer from St Louis County was shot in the shoulder, St Louis County Police Chief Jon Belmar said.

Both were taken to hospital, where Belmar said they were conscious, but described their injuries as ’serious’ without giving further details.

‘These police officers were standing there and they were shot, just because they were police officers, he added.

A few dozen demonstrators fled following the gunfire, with some screaming that ‘they hit a cop’ around midnight, a photographer with Reuters said.

Nu venter vi på at Obama fordømmer attentatet, men udviser sin forståelse for vreden. Og måske tillige betror os at det kunne være hans egen søn der skød? Vinklen i medierne kører over en bred karm på netop den pointe, den retfærdige vrede mod et racistiske politi. Og de kan bakke påstanden op med en undersøgelse fra Department of Justice, der blev udgivet tidligere på måneden. Information kaldte det en chock-rapport

Statistikken taler sit tydelige sprog. I Ferguson er 67 pct. af befolkningen sort, men i perioden 2012-14 var hele 85 pct. af bilerne, der blev stoppet af politiet, ejet af afroamerikanere. Sorte udgjorde 88 pct. af dem, der blev udsat for politivold og 93 pct. af de arresterede i 2012-14 var sorte.

Så tydeligt taler statistikken dog ikke. Kriminelle bliver oftere uretmæssigt stoppet en lovlydige borgere (i en blanding af almindelig fremtoning og genkendelse ved gengangere) og sorte er blot mere kriminelle end ikke-sorte - af forskellige årsager, grangiveligt. Men der er mistanke om et mafiøst system, da kommunen er tilskyndet til at balancere sine budgetter, gennem bøder fortæller Information videre

Bag tallene skjuler sig et hvidt magtsystem, der ikke alene forskelsbehandler sorte. I Ferguson og – hævder sorte amerikanske ledere – i andre byer landet rundt med afroamerikanske beboere anvender politi og civile myndighedspersoner loven til at udbytte den fattige og sårbare del af befolkningen økonomisk.

I Ferguson giver det sig udslag i åbenlys pengeafpresning af sagesløse borgere med det ene formål at inddrive så store indtægter som muligt til dækning af de relativt høje lønninger, som politi, dommere, embedsmænd og kommunalpolitikere får.

I dette mafiøse magtsystem præmieres politibetjente af kommunalpolitikere for at pålægge borgerne så mange og så store bøder som muligt for alle mulige forseelser, der ofte – ifølge rapporten – er uberettigede og i alle tilfælde intet har at gøre med politiets hovedopgave: at beskytte borgerne.

Retten er underlagt politimesteren, hvorfor det står dommerne frit at afvise anker og fordoble og tredoble bøder, hvis ’synderen’ betaler for sent eller ikke har tilstrækkeligt med penge til at betale det fulde beløb. Domstolen sender jævnligt skyldnere i fængsel. Alene i 2014 var 9.000 af de omkring 21.000 borgere i Ferguson en kort tur bag tremmer. 95 pct. af disse var sorte.

Igen, racisme antages at ligge til grund, når systemet måske blot er udgjort af almindeligt dumme svin. Think Progress har samlet nogle eksempler på racisme, eller i hvert fald på sorte der er blevet behandlet skandaløst. Men når man smider Oscars efter Selma som kompensation for de penge negertragedien ikke kunne indtjene selv så er det fordi jorden for længst er gødet. Hollywwod elsker racisme meget mere end amerikanerne gider praktisere den. Samuel L Jackson ville have sine medcelebriteter til at synge om de racistiske politi, Charlie Shee

Så der kan være andre grunde end indebrændt vrede over at blive undertrykt som forklaring på attentatet på de to betjente. Demontranter i Ferguson krævede Darren Wilson dræbt og mente at USA var racistisk på grund af de hvide. Darren Wilson var den betjent, der i selvforsvar skød og dræbte Michael Brown også kaldet The Gentle Giant. Der fulgte krav om genopbygning, for ellers… Samme ånd gik igennem andre byer. I New York krævede demonstranter højlydt død over politibetjente og to beskikkede forsvarere deltog i en rap med samme død-over-politiet tema. Og Ferguson kunne endda bruges til angreb på Israel og jøder - hvad kan ikke det?

fergusonpalestine

ferguson-jews-control-everything

Darren Wilson blev frikendt i en omstridt høring. Omstridt ikke fordi den rent juridisk var unødvendig, da der ikke eksisterede grund til at rejse tiltale mod Wilson og dermed ingen grund til en høring. Men omstridt fordi anklageren, der gav efter for ballademagernes trusler om vold i gaderne, prøvede at dele sol og vind lige, ved at lade Wilson føre et forsvar, hvad der ikke er en hørings formål.

På Think Progress fandt man ligheder med en anden selvforsvarssag mistænkelig. Her mente man, at den hvide politimand Darren Wilsons forklaring lignede George Zimmermann, den jødiske hispanic, der i selvforsvar dræbte den sorte Trayvon Martin, ubehageligt meget

The description is eerily similar to another lethal confrontation with an unarmed black teen in broad daylight: the death of Trayvon Martin in Sanford, Florida. George Zimmerman, the man who shot and killed Martin, told police that the teen “jumped out from the bushes” and punched him in the face, knocking him down. “I started screaming for help. I couldn’t see. I couldn’t breathe,” he said. “He grabbed my head and started hitting it into the sidewalk. My head felt like it was going to explode.”

Zimmerman also claimed Martin put his hand over Zimmerman’s mouth and nose and told him, “You’re going to die tonight.”

Both Zimmerman and Darren Wilson told officials that the young men they killed had their hands in their waistbands—suggesting they feared the presence of a weapon when there was none.

Throughout his testimony, Wilson repeatedly referenced Brown’s size, calling him “really big,” “obviously bigger than I was,” and saying he felt “like a five-year-old holding onto Hulk Hogan,” though the two men were about the same height.

Later, describing the moment right after he first fired the first bullet, he said Brown “looked up at me and had the most intense aggressive face. The only way I can describe it, it looks like a demon.” In other places, he describes Brown in animalistic terms (“he made like a grunting, like aggravated sound”) and supernatural ones (“it looked like he was almost bulking up to run through the shots”).

Zimmerman offered a vaguer physical description, telling a 911 dispatcher that Martin looked like “real suspicious guy” and saying: “This guy looks like he’s up to no good, or he’s on drugs or something.”

Both Zimmerman and Wilson are free men today, in part because of these accounts and descriptions provided to law enforcement and the courts. Though the public may never know exactly what happened on those days, research shows that hidden biases often lead people to see African Americans as aggressive, superhuman and less vulnerable to pain.

At store bøller er store bøller og derfor beskrives som store bøller (pyha, der undgik jeg at skrive at alle niggere er ens) var typisk hvad der undslap mediernes dækning. Den var fokuseret på fortællinger om virkeligheden udenb at tage virkeligheden i betragtning. For at hamre deres pointe hjem så viste Think Progress, som snart sagt alle andre medier et billede af the gentle giant Darren Brown med studenterhue ved siden af et børnebillede af Trayvon Martin

mikebrown-trayvonmartin

Hvad der dog især lignede hinanden ved fortællingerne var mediernes heksejagt. Breitbart skrev

New York Times had no qualms whatsoever about publishing almost all the information needed for Officer Darren Wilson’s enemies to track him and his wife down at home:

Officer Wilson and [his wife] own a home together on XXXXXXX Lane in XXXXXXXXXX, Mo., a St. Louis suburb about a half-hour drive from Ferguson.

This malicious move by the New York Times has not gone unnoticed by Ferguson’s protesters:

But printing his street name in the nation’s most influential newspaper on the day the grand jury is expected to hand up a decision on the indictment could reignite interest in — and awareness of — the location, and some critics worry that it could result in protesters descending on his home. Slate even went a step further than the Times, publishing an article featuring a photo of the modest, red-brick house on Monday.

A number of Twitter users — some of whom have identified themselves as planning to protest the grand jury decision — have tweeted the location of Wilson’s home as they gear up for rallies. The house number was not printed in the Times, but the street in the St. Louis suburb of Crestwood where it sits is only about two blocks long, and the house number can be easily located via online sources using only the street name and Wilson’s name.

This type of behavior is nothing new from our elite media. When the media was pulling out the stops to electronically lynch George Zimmerman like they are Wilson, CNNbroadcast Zimmerman’s Social Security number to the world.

Thomas Sowell beskrev ligeledes mediernes samspil med pøblen. Og medierne havde deres historie. Jonah Goldberg skrev dengang

Brown wasn’t a person who allegedly robbed a convenience store. He was a stand-in for racial injustice. That’s what was so powerful about Brown’s (probably mythological) “hands up” gesture.

The outrage that followed when the convenience store robbery video was released and details from the grand jury were leaked was at least in part fury at having the narrative muddied. No one likes to see fresh gospel fact-checked. No one wants to hear that their martyr was in fact no angel. And, in the case of Wilson, no one wants to see their demon humanized.

Jesper Steinmetz rapporterede for TV2 News samme dag kendelsen faldt at også sortejede butikker blev stukket i brand, hvilket for ham viste, at der var elementer blandt demonstranterne, der slet ikke respekterer det lille by-samfund. Den indre racisme i den logik var tabt for den samlede presses dækning. Andre grunde til at nogle butikker gik fri skyldtes dog det frie initiativ

tattooguns777-thumb-550x366

Den sorte kultur har kørt sig selv ned i en selvretfærdig skruestik af offergørelse. Og fortællingen er så sexet af løsningens banaliteter virker komiske

Billeder af racialt selvhad

Demografi, Diverse, Kristendom, Multikultur, Pressen, Race, Racisme, USA, venstrefløjen — Drokles on March 10, 2015 at 2:36 pm

Blot en lille amerikansk stemningsrapport fra de moralsk overlegne på venstrefløjen. Think Progress fortæller om den sørgelige demografiske og åndelige udvikling i USA. Hvide kristne bliver en stadigt mindre del af befolkningen

A new study reports that white Christians, long understood to be the primary shapers of American politics and culture, are rapidly losing their majority status across the country — even in traditionally conservative states.

Earlier this week, Jonathan Merritt of the Religion News Service dug into data from the American Values Atlas, a website unveiled late last year by the Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI) that aggregates polling information on the political opinions, values, and religious affiliations of Americans. The wealth of data is a lot to sift through, but Merritt pointed to a striking revelation: white Christians, once the majority in virtually every major population area in America, are now a minority in 19 states.

For their surveys, PRRI defines “white Christian” as evangelical Protestants, mainline Protestants, Catholics, and Orthodox Christians who list their identity as “white, non-Hispanic.” (Interestingly, PRRI also includes white Mormons in this group, who are sometimes listed by sociologists as separate from the rest of Christianity due to their unique religious views and texts.)

white-christain-religious-minorityv4

Think Progress Facebook venner var svært begejstrede over at de hvide, long understood to be the primary shapers of American politics and culture, er på tilbagetog. Her et par af de første kommentarer fra de hundredevis skadefro HVIDE amerikanere

Richard Toker Guess you old white racist men are on the way out!

(…)

Leah Alley Yes they are, this is also true about “white” people in general,many are interracial, a large amount of people are gay,It wont be long before the mighty hunters and the fishermen are gone too. A new world is forming. Less racism more acceptance.

(…)

Kyung Sook people who have common sense would not follow christian today. They promoting hate.

(…)

Lois Kaznica Best news all day.

skc3a6rmbillede-2015-03-10-kl-133204

Jep, fem HVIDE børn, er ikke for mange når det er ens egne.

Calvin Lindfors Not the majority doesn’t mean they aren’t still the plurality, which means they’ll unfortunately hold disproportionate power for a while yet.

Paulina Martinez Exactly. It’ll be like apartheid for a while yet.

(…)

Wendy Winett Costello Does it matter??? HOw many are humans? HOw many are kind? HOw many are starving?

Oliver Flores Of course it matters, you think a religious group is gonna end hunger? No my friend, is scientific advancements what will fix it, not praying for miracles.

Lockley Alsoknownas Joe If you’re a “White Privilege” denier, than I guess it doesn’t matter. But most deniers are also benefactors of the aforementioned privilege.

(…)

Kathryn Hilton Yay. I’m white but I gave up being a Christian in exchange for being a kind, compassionate, loving human being.

(…)

Mark Williams Arizona, Texas, and Florida demonstrate that a minority can still rule. But as with South Africa, Apartheid tactics can only work for so long.

(…)

James Shamus Nilan thank goodness to see it happening in my lifetime

Tracey Hering Goodman Finally some good news.

Nicole Coelho Antoun Thank god. And I say that as a white Christian.

(…)

Kari Hulgaard Well thank goodness diversity is becoming the norm!

(…)

Veronica Pawlus Hargrove Great news!

(…)

Sally Basile It can’t happen fast enough IMO.

Det er ikke glæden ved nye ansigter, der var gennemgående blandt kommentarerne. Det var glæden ved af hvide blev i mindretal. En glæde, man givetvis ikke ville dele, hvis der kom et stort hvidt rykind i Afrika.

Hvad der er i orden i Sverige

Den svenske ishockeylegende Börje Salming er blevet fotograferet til kalenderen “Årets kvinnor och män 2015” (bemærk den svenske sans for korrekt rækkefølge og at de har dristet sig til ikke blot at skrive årets personer) sammen med en række andre svenske berømtheder (Salming er februar). Alle er de udklædt som andre berømtheder fra historien og Salming som Sitting Bull. Og det har ramt den svenske sans for racisme, skriver Expressen

Frilansjournalisten Angela Larsson har själv deltagit i debatten vid ett flertal tillfällen, och hon reagerade på Salmings bild.

– Det var säkert inte menat att förlöjliga, och Börje kommer förmodligen att säga att det var en hyllning. Och jag förstår att man kan se det så, men det blir jätteproblematiskt, att en vit person ska klä ut sig till en amerikansk urinvånare. De har varit extremt förtryckta och utsätts fortfarande för jättemycket rasism i USA, säger hon till SportExpressen.se.

(…)

– Både samer och amerikanska urinvånare har blivit förtryckta på liknande sätt. Men jag vet inte om jag skulle tycka att det var okej för det. Om du skulle fråga en amerikansk urinvånare så är jag rätt säker på att det inte skulle vara okej. Börje är fortfarande vit, säger hon.

– I USA har studenter på Ohios universitet dragit i gång en kampanj på temat: “We are a culture, not a costume” (”Vi är en kultur, inte en maskeraddräkt”, reds. anm.) och väckte frågan om maskeradkostymen som problematisk. Att en vit person kan klä ut sig i en kväll och ha kul, medan en amerikansk urinvånare måste utstå förtrycket de utsätts för hela livet.

Altså følgende er ikke okay

borjesalming-sitting-bull

Mens dette er okay

president_barack_obama

Negerderoute

Diverse, Forbrydelse og straf, Multikultur, Race, Racisme, venstrefløjen — Drokles on November 20, 2014 at 1:13 pm

Vi venter i spænding på dommen i Ferguson, hvor en politimand står anklaget for at have skudt en ubevæbnet teenager. En sort teenager, hvorfor der er store spændinger, som venstrefløjen elsker at opdyrke. Det er noget med strukturel racisme og undertrykte masser og minoriteter på een og samme gang. Jeg kom til at tænke på, hvor langt USA egentlig er nået i forholdet mellem sorte og hvide siden slaveriet blev ophævet da Daily Mail forleden viste nogle billeder fra en svunden tid med segregering i de amerikanske sydstater.

1415915696272_wps_2_must_link_back_to_site_ht

1415915696285_wps_4_must_link_back_to_site_ht

1415915696332_wps_11_must_link_back_to_site_ht

Billederne er fra Alabama og er taget af Gordon Parks i 1956. De vidner om en tid med institutionaliseret racisme og det midt i den frie verden. Ikke alting var bedre i gamle dage. Men som det fremgår af billederne, så fremstod sorte amerikanere med en værdighed, der trodsede det uværdige system, der holdt dem som 2. rangs borgere. Negre var mennesker og derfor også borgere og borgere måtte have rettigheder. Borgerretsbevægelsen havde ret, helt ret.

Men bevægelsens succes fik sit eget liv og et momentum, som ikke lod sig stoppe. Revolutionen skulle snart æde sine børn. For ligeret blev til krav om ligemageri og værdighed blev fortrængt af berettigelse. En fortælling om slaveri og undertrykkelse blev en identitet, retfærdighed blev til selvretfærdighed. Thomas Sowell skriver i National Review Online

Despite the grand myth that black economic progress began or accelerated with the passage of the Civil Rights laws and “War on Poverty” programs of the 1960s, the cold fact is that the poverty rate among blacks fell from 87 percent in 1940 to 47 percent by 1960. This was before any of those programs began.

Over the next 20 years, the poverty rate among blacks fell another 18 percentage points, compared to the 40-point drop in the previous 20 years. This was the continuation of a previous economic trend, at a slower rate of progress, not the economic grand deliverance proclaimed by liberals and self-serving black “leaders.”

Ending the Jim Crow laws was a landmark achievement. But, despite the great proliferation of black political and other “leaders” that resulted from the laws and policies of the 1960s, nothing comparable happened economically. And there were serious retrogressions socially.

Nearly a hundred years of the supposed “legacy of slavery” found most black children being raised in two-parent families in 1960. But thirty years after the liberal welfare state found the great majority of black children being raised by a single parent.

The murder rate among blacks in 1960 was one-half of what it became 20 years later, after a legacy of liberals’ law-enforcement policies. Public-housing projects in the first half of the 20th century were clean, safe places, where people slept outside on hot summer nights, when they were too poor to afford air conditioning. That was before admissions standards for public-housing projects were lowered or abandoned, in the euphoria of liberal non-judgmental notions. And it was before the toxic message of victimhood was spread by liberals. We all know what hell holes public housing has become in our times. The same toxic message produced similar social results among lower-income people in England, despite an absence of a “legacy of slavery” there.

If we are to go by evidence of social retrogression, liberals have wreaked more havoc on blacks than the supposed “legacy of slavery” they talk about. Liberals should heed the title of Jason Riley’s insightful new book, Please Stop Helping Us.

Og i samme periode faldt den ellers stabile sorte famile fra hinanden, som man kan læse hos Discover The Networks

Illegitimacy is an important issue because it has a great influence on all statistical indicators of a population group’s progress or decline. In 1987, for the first time in the history of any American racial or ethnic group, the birth rate for unmarried black women surpassed that for married black women, and that trend continued uninterrupted until the passage of welfare reform. The black out-of-wedlock birth rates in some inner cities now exceed 80 percent, and most of those mothers are teens. Because unmarried teenage mothers—whatever their race—typically have no steady employment, nearly 80 percent of them apply for welfare benefits within five years after giving birth to their first child. No group can withstand such a wholesale collapse of its family structure without experiencing devastating social consequences.

Father-absent families—black and white alike—generally occupy the bottom rung of our society’s economic ladder. Unwed mothers, regardless of their race, are four times more likely to live in poverty than the average American. Female-headed black families earn only 36 percent as much as two-parent black families, and female-headed white families earn just 46 percent as much as two-parent white families. Not only do unmarried mothers tend to earn relatively little, but their households are obviously limited to a single breadwinner—thus further widening the income gap between one-parent and two-parent families. Fully 85 percent of all black children in poverty live in single-parent, mother-child homes.

(…)

Children in single-parent households are raised not only with economic, but also social and psychological, disadvantages. For instance, they are four times as likely as children from intact families to be abused or neglected; much likelier to have trouble academically; twice as prone to drop out of school; three times more likely to have behavioral problems; much more apt to experience emotional disorders; far likelier to have a weak sense right and wrong; significantly less able to delay gratification and to control their violent or sexual impulses; two-and-a-half times likelier to be sexually active as teens; approximately twice as likely to conceive children out-of-wedlock when they are teens or young adults; and three times likelier to be on welfare when they reach adulthood.

In addition, growing up without a father is a far better forecaster of a boy’s future criminality than either race or poverty. Regardless of race, 70 percent of all young people in state reform institutions were raised in fatherless homes, as were 60 percent of rapists, 72 percent of adolescent murderers, and 70 percent of long-term prison inmates. As Heritage Foundation scholar Robert Rector has noted, “Illegitimacy is a major factor in America’s crime problem. Lack of married parents, rather than race or poverty, is the principal factor in the crime rate.”

Since the black illegitimacy rate is so high, these pathologies plague blacks more than they affect any other demographic. “Even if white people were to become morally rejuvenated tomorrow,” writes black economist and professor Walter E. Williams, “it would do nothing for the problems plaguing a large segment of the black community. Illegitimacy, family breakdown, crime, and fraudulent education are devastating problems, but they are not civil rights problems.”

(…)

It bears mention that the astronomical illegitimacy rate among African Americans is a relatively recent phenomenon. As late as 1950, black women nationwide were more likely to be married than white women, and only 9 percent of black families with children were headed by a single parent. In the 1950s, black children had a 52 percent chance of living with both their biological parents until age seventeen; by the 1980s those odds had dwindled to a mere 6 percent. In 1959, only 2 percent of black children were reared in households in which the mother never married; today that figure approaches 60 percent.

The destruction of this stable black family was set in motion by the policies and teachings of the left, which for decades have encouraged blacks to view themselves as outcasts from a hostile American society; to identify themselves as perpetual victims who are entitled to compensatory privileges designed to “level the playing field” in a land where discrimination would otherwise run rampant; and to reject “white” norms and traditions as part and parcel of the “racist” culture that allegedly despises blacks.

Dyrkelsen af en sort kultur er ikke stort andet end et vræng, af de aspirationer, der drev borgerretsbevægelsen.

Rosa Parks ville ikke sidde på en bestemt plads i bussen. Hun ville sidde som et hvert andet menneske, ikke som en neger.

Lille quiz

Akademia, Information, Race, Racisme, Satire, venstrefløjen — Drokles on November 16, 2014 at 2:15 am

Hvad er satire, hvad er ikke? Først en historie

I et voldeligt og sygdomsplaget land sidder en person, som ingen i Danmark har hørt om, og har det virkelig hårdt. Vedkommende har ikke spist i flere dage og ønsker knap at overleve i sin krigshærgede hjemby; tanken om et nyt liv i et andet land er meget fjern.

Ingen danske politikere kerer sig dog om denne triste skæbne.

“Nej, jeg har ingen planer om at hjælpe, medmindre vedkommende har tænkt sig at flygte til Danmark,” udtaler justitsminister Mette Frederiksen, idet hun understreger, at næstekærlighed er en vanskelig størrelse, og at vi skal hjælpe i nærområderne.

Kun spændende grupper
Det samme gælder for handels- og udviklingsminister Mogens Jensen, der dog kunne være interesseret, hvis den fattige person tilhører en spændende gruppe, fx unge kvinder mellem 20-30 år, der ønsker mikrolån, eller sekulære oprørere fra Mellemøsten, der skriver godt engelsk.

“Hvis man kan skrive et skarpt læserbrev, som en praktikant på en af morgenaviserne eller DR kan oversætte til dansk, har man en chance for, at vi gider tage det op. Men læserbrevet skal ikke bare handle om kedelige ting i Syrien eller Irak; der skal gerne være en kobling til dansk politik, hvor vi fremstår fremsynede og humane, mens fx Dansk Folkeparti fremstår fremmedfjendske og tilbagestående,” forklarer Mogens Jensen.

Så et indlæg

Racister er vi alle. Det er en nødvendig konsekvens af vores historie, som gennem tusinde år har dyrket et farvehierarki. Konsekvensen af den racismeblindhed, som bliver dyrket i fetichlignende grad for tiden, er, at racismen trives endnu bedre.

(…)

Selve proklamationen ’jeg er ikke-racist’, er racistisk. Hvis du er hvid og kalder dig ikke-racist, insisterer du på, at du ved, hvad racisme er, og i hvert fald hvor det ikke er.

Næste skridt er at kalde minoriteter for overfølsomme, for hvis du ikke er racist, og nogen bliver stødt af, hvad du (eller nogen du minder om) gør eller siger, kan det umuligt være dig, den er gal med. Du har jo højt og helligt sværget, at du ikke er racist.

(…)

Man udøver den magt, som den hvide mand igen og igen har udøvet gennem historien: Man producerer og reproducerer racer, stereotyper og en brun persons udanskhed.

Masochistiske magtudøvelser

Hvide menneskers dyrkelse af deres egen ikke-racisme er en demonstrativ magtudøvelse. Man demonstrerer sin magt til at definere sin magt til at positionere sin magt til at legitimere.

Man definerer den brune som dansk/ikke dansk ved at tale om denne som enten ’indvandrer og efterkommer,’ eller som ’du-er-jo-dansk,’ som oftest i en kombination. Budskabet bliver: Du er dansk, men ikke rigtig-dansk. Det er den hvide, som bestemmer, hvilken kategori den brune tilhører.

(…)

Først når man anerkender det; anerkender, at nogle farver har tilhørende privilegier, mens andre ikke har, kan man begynde at snakke om anti-racisme. Kategorien ’ikke-racist’ er en umulig kategori i vores tid.

Kun ved at sætte sig ind i, hvad racisme egentlig er, og hvordan man selv er en del af problemet, kan man begynde at fornemme en løsning: At stoppe med at udøve den magt, man har på baggrund af sin privilegerede position. Den eneste magt, man som hvid person mister ved dette, er magten til at undertrykke. Og man kan endda genoptage den, når som helst man vil, for det er et af privilegierne, ved at være hvid.

Når man påstår menneskers lighed, kan man kun gøre det som en moralsk dom. Det eneste lige mellem hvide og brune mennesker er deres værdi. En sådan påstand er en holdning, man må tage op med sig selv, om man kan erklære sig enig i eller ej. Men så længe man er overbevist om, at hvide og brune mennesker har lige muligheder, udøver man en magt, som vedligeholder hvidt hegemoni.

Hvis de eksisterende magtstrukturer skal ændres, må vi erkende, at vi altid selv har en rolle, ud fra hvordan vi er givet til situationen.

Er du hvid, har du højest sandsynligt privilegier. Er du brun, har du højest sandsynligt ikke de samme privilegier.

Jeg vil ikke legitimeres af en hvid person – jeg vil ikke overrækkes min danskhed, jeg vil ikke have at vide, at jeg skal se det som en god ting, at jeg er eksotisk, og jeg vil ikke have at vide, at jeg ikke skal skamme mig over min baggrund, når jeg nægter at dele mit stamtræ med fremmede, hvide mennesker.

Vi er alle sammen ofre, brune som hvide, for den racisme, vi selv holder på, da den er et uomgængeligt produkt af vores historie og vores samfund. Men vi er ikke alle ofre for racisme.

Hvad er Rokokoposten, hvad er Information?

Set på Uriasposten

Når Ulve hyler II

Akademia, Demografi, Diverse, Ligestilling, Multikultur, Race, Racisme, USA, venstrefløjen — Drokles on November 6, 2014 at 6:24 pm

Som nævnt tidligere har videoen af en ung mørkklædt kvinde der går gennem New Yorks gader vakt en del opsigt. I løbet af de ti timers vandring fik Shoshana Roberts, kvinden i sort, en del tilråb fra opmærksomme mænd. Gruppen Hollaback, der har produceret videoen, ville sætte fokus på mænds nogen gange ublu seksualisering af unge kvinder, men, som man selv kunne se, var det ikke bare mænd over en bred karm. Tilråbene og den uønskede opmærksomhed kom fra sorte og off-white amerikanere. Og det ramte lige ned i venstrefløjens ømme kognitive dissonans. Charles C W Cooke, giver et fremragende resume for National Review

As it has grown in popularity, the video has been transformed into a blank canvas, onto which America’s brave advocates of hyphenated-justice have sought to project their favored social theories. Evidently unwilling to let the spot stand on its own, Purdue’s Roxanne Gay wrote sadly that “it’s difficult and uncomfortable to admit that we have to talk about race/class/gender/sexuality/ability/etc, all at once.” Alas, she was not alone. Soon, the claims of “sexism” had been joined by accusations of “racism” and of “classism,” Hollaback had been forced to acknowledge that it had upset the more delicate among us, and those who had celebrated the video had been denounced as unreconstructed bigots. By this process was its message diluted and appropriated, the country’s most prominent peddlers of grievance and discord electing to squabble and bicker over its meaning, and to strip it of its value in favor of their own, fringe fixations.

In the exquisitely calibrated judgment of The Nation’s “racial justice” guru, Aura Bogado, the spot was “deeply problematic,” serving not to highlight the frequency with which women are bothered on the street, but instead perpetuating “the myth of the cult of white white womanhood by literally placing this white woman in neighborhoods where men of color will be the ones who catcall (or, in some instances, say hello to) her.” “Doing so,” Bogado writes, “makes it appear as if men of color are the perpetrators of all that is bad on this planet, which can only be balanced with the exigent need to therefore save white women above all else.” The only solution, she says, is to remake the video with a “universalizing” cast: the camera centering on, “say, a black trans woman.”

(…)

Consider how far its critics are stretching to discredit the experiment’s results. On Wednesday, Roxanne Gay suggested with palpable irritation that “the racial politics of the video are f****d up. Like, she didn’t walk through any white neighborhoods?” For her part, Salon’s Emily Gould went full circle, seeking to justify the behavior of the maligned cat-callers by submitting that they had been forced into it by the actions of white people writ large. “This kind of harassment,” Gould wrote, “can be a way marginalized groups talk back to the white gentrifiers taking over their neighborhoods.” In and of itself, this view strikes me as being grotesquely condescending — the perverse cousin, perhaps, of precisely the sort of racial stereotyping that progressives believe they have been divinely called upon to destroy.

To contend that the minorities depicted in the video are mere victims of circumstance and that they have been forced by their conditions into badgering innocent women on the street is to contend that those minorities lack agency, intelligence, sensitivity, and the capacity to reason — that they are child-like figures who act on their base instincts and who need excusing and explaining by their betters. Oddly enough, it is also to contend that the victim was either a “white gentrifier” herself, or a proxy for white gentrifiers, and that she therefore deserved the treatment she received. This presumption, it should go without saying, is typically anathema to the arbiters of feminist thought. One cannot help but wonder whether, weighed down by their own contradictions, the champions of “empowerment” have at last become what they despise themselves?

Og der er allerede fortaget flere efterligninger af Shoshana Roberts vandring: En hunk i New York, en transvestit i Los Angeles og en kvindelig kriger i Skyrim - hvor ellers?

Når ulve hyler

Demografi, Diverse, Ligestilling, Multikultur, Race, Racisme, Ytringsfrihed — Drokles on October 31, 2014 at 4:07 am

Skuespilleren Shoshana Roberts gik i 10 timer gennem New Yorks gader, mens hun blev filmet i skjul. Ideen var at vise, hvorledes nogle mænd hverken kan holde deres øjne eller tanker for sig selv

Bortset fra klammoerne, der følger hende er fleste kommentarer ikke ondsindede omend lettere kiksede til det ucharmerende. Og de giver måske et indtryk af en virkelighed, de fleste af os (desværre) er ikke er forundt, som Allahpundit pointerer på Hot Air, hvor han selv har følgende sigende anekdote

The only time I can recall being present when a woman was catcalled on the streets was once a few years ago when I was getting off the subway and a beautiful blonde woman dressed for a night out was getting on. Men stopped in their tracks; someone in the vicinity (no, not me) said, loudly enough for everyone nearby to hear, “Oh yeah, that’s a ten.”

“Oh yeah, that’s a ten” er en sigende bemærkning fordi den ikke anråber vores opmærksomhed, som “Se den røv!”, men selvfølgeligt antager den og sætter en kommentar på. Den er næsten bedre end videoen, var det ikke for den vandrende babe.

Nu er almindelig sexchikane på gadeplan, hvis maskuline komplimenter absolut skal kaldes det, ikke Monokulturs største interesse. Men det er chancen for lidt lummer racisme derimod. For at dømme efter udseende og stemmeføring kommer 2/3 af bemærkningerne fra negre. Og af resten virker det lettere latinohvidt. En neger har måske derfor indvendinger.

Når man slår ned i et kobbel ulve…

10 Hours of Walking in NYC as a Man - watch more funny videos

Ifølge BT har Shoshana Roberts siden modtaget trusler, men om dem ved vi ikke mere end at det øjensynlig blot er fra mænd.

I disse Dan Park tider

I Sverige har man jo som sikkert bekendt fængslet gadekunstneren Dan Park for billeder som disse (fra Uwe Max Jensens Den Frie, der har lidt baggrund og analyse om ‘værket’, men alle de forbudte kan ses og købes her http://www.entartetekunst.dk/)

hang-onafrofobians

Dan Parks kunst er ren modsigelse at enhver herskende ideologiens indre modsigelser, for nu at tale marxistisk og i Sverige er den altså multikulturelisme. Park er blevet anholdt og dømt flere gange for sin kunst, som myndighederne anser som racistisk eller had mod mindretal eller hvad den slags hedder på ny-juridisk. Park blev senest anholdt efter en galleriudstilling og fængslet i 6 måneder og hans kunst blev konfiskeret. Men inden da, samledes en hob sig foran galleriet med kravet om at Park skulle væk et vist sted.

10639468_10152304561306766_1731074272604927010_n

Parks modtræk kan man se på billedet herover, som jeg tror vil være ikonisk. Han deltager på sin egen måde i demonstrationen imod ham selv og kræver sin egen udstilling forbudt fordi den er entartete kunst. Sådan!

Men også Astrid Lindgrens univers er for stødende for den svenske hegemoni skriver STV

I nyutgåvan av Pippi Långstrump har SVT klippt bort material som kan uppfattas som stötande.

Det är tv-serien ”Här kommer Pippi Långstrump”, som sändes i SVT för första gången 1969, som nu kommer i en restaurerad DVD-utgåva där både bild- och ljudkvalitén har förbättrats.

Andra förändringar som gjorts är att scener där skådespelerskan Inger Nilssons Pippi refererar till sin far som ”negerkung” har ändrats så att hon numera bara säger ”kung”. Även en scen där Pippi leker ”kines” genom att sträcka ut huden runt ögonen har klippts om.

”Målgruppen är barn”

Det var SVT som själva tog initiativet till förändringarna. Anledningen är att det 45 år gamla materialet kan verka stötande i mötet med en modern publik.

Hun afskyede selv nationalisme og racisme og den slags skriver Nyheter24Nyheter24 har i den ånd samlet 17 kommentarer, som de finder urimelige

1. Politiker är griniga fjortisar med PMS. Det här är däremot en fullständigt rimlig reaktion?

2. Sjukt rasistiskt av Svt…. typ.

3. “Kolla nu barn, nu kommer det, nu säger hon det snart!”

4. Att säga n*r= älska sitt land.

5. Snillen spekulerar

6. Dags att kolla GPS:en?

7. Det är jobbigt när folk skrattar åt en, speciellt utomlands.

8. Ja, hela grejen man älskade med Pippi var ju farsans titel. Nu är Pippi ju helt värdelös!

9. Vilken tur! Nu gäller det bara att hitta en VHS-spelare någonstans!

10. Hen tänker inte ens kommentera det!!

11. Snart får man väl inte ens fika i det här j-a landet?

12. Snart får man väl inte ens käka lunch i det här j- landet???

13. Motfrågor - nättrollens värsta fiende.

14. Hur.. va? Jag kan inte ens….

15. Hur ska vi göra på natten egentligen? Hela Sverige blir ju rasistiskt då?!?!?

16. Nu har allt gått så långt att man inte ens kan bo här längre!!

17. Snart är vi så töntiga att vi får byta namn!!!

Og i England finder man tillige antiracisme racistisk fortæller Jyllands-Posten

Kontroversiel udstilling med levende sorte modeller er efter én dag lukket i London.

Den har været vist 12 steder i verden i de seneste måneder.

Uden problemer selvom den har sat gang i debatten.

Men i London gik det bare slet ikke.

Efter kun en enkelt dag besluttede Barbican Center at lukke den sydafrikanske instruktør Brett Bailyskontroversielle udstilling “Exhibit B”.

Det skete efter voldsom kritik på alle sociale medier, trusler mod de medvirkende, arrangører og publikum.

Og onsdag krævede over 200 demonstranter foran museet, at udstillingen skulle lukkes øjeblikkeligt.

Lukningen af “Exhibit B” har nu udløst en voldsom debat om kunstneres ret til at ytre sig.

Med sin udstilling, der også præsenterer en række levende sorte modeller, har Brett Bailey ønsket at berette om de afrikanske slaver og asylansøgere under kolonitiden i Storbritannien.

Den store trang til censur er mere et behov, en nødvendighed ligefrem. Den engelske regering beskrev ufrivilligt deres eget samfund som en krudttønde da de forbød den hollandske politiker Geert Wilders indrejse for et par år tilbage.

The Gentle Giant i Ferguson

Diverse, Forbrydelse og straf, Race, Racisme, USA — Drokles on September 17, 2014 at 4:35 am

Fra tid til anden gennemgår USA nærmest rituelt en racedebat når en sort amerikaner placeres i en eller anden offerrolle i forhold til de hvides undertrykkende hegemoni. Her i Europa husker vi nok da Los Angeles oplevede nogle af de værste uroligheder efter 4 politifolk blev frikendt for at have gennemtævet vaneforbryderen og drukkenbolten Rodney King efter en biljagt. Over et halvt hundrede mennesker blev dræbt, da sorte amerikanere forvanlede sig til en rasende pøbel, der hævnede hvad de så som endnu et udslag af den strukturelle racisme på primært andre minoriteter. Da den amerikanske tidligere sportsstjerne O J Simpson et par år dolkede sin hvide kone og hendes jødiske ‘ven’ til døde var anklagen fra det sorte samfund igen at Simpson ville blive dømt fordi han var sort og ikke et morderisk røvhul. Og sorte følte sig igen som ofre da latinojøden George Zimmerman blev frikendt for i selvfosvar at have skuddræbt den sorte Trayvon Martin.

Der har været mange andre pøbeloptøjer. Alene i heleren Obamas periode har man foruden balladen om George Zimmerman også haft Oscar Grant optøjerne i 2009 som flammede op efter den sorte Oscar Grant blev skuddræbt af en politimand i Oakland i Californien. I 2012 udbrød der uroligheder da politiet dræbte bandemedlemmet Manuel Diaz og året efter politiet i Brooklyn skød og dræbte den kun 16 årige Kimani Gray. Og i sommer var det så hvide politifolk, der igen dræbte en sort mand i Ferguson i Missouri.

Michael Brown was 6-foot-4 and 290 pounds. He had marijuana in his system and was purportedly involved in a strong-arm robbery prior to the shooting. He and a companion were walking in the middle of the street and obstructing traffic and therefore were admonished by a police officer to move to the sidewalk. Brown, who may have been pharmacologically impaired, became belligerent, and the ensuing struggle produced facial trauma and an orbital fracture of the police officer’s face. The officer, who may have been dazed by a blow to the cranium severe enough to produce a fracture, attempted to apprehend the assailant, and shots were fired, six of which struck the suspect, resulting in a fatality.

Det skriver Ben Carson på National Review og Thomas Sowell, der også er negerfarvet skriver i Townhall

Race is the wild card in all this. The idea that you can tell who is innocent and who is guilty by the color of their skin is a notion that was tried out for generations, back in the days of the Jim Crow South. I thought we had finally rejected that kind of legalized lynch law. But apparently it has only been put under new management.

Television people who show the home of the policeman involved, and give his name and address — knowing that he has already received death threats — are truly setting a new low. They seem to be trying to make themselves judge, jury and executioner.

Then there are the inevitable bullet counters asking, “Why did he shoot him six times?” This is the kind of thing people say when they are satisfied with talking points, and see no need to stop and think seriously about a life and death question. If you are not going to be serious about life and death, when will you be serious?By what principle should someone decide how many shots should be fired? The bullet counters seldom, if ever, ask that question, much less try to answer it.

Since the only justifiable reason for shooting in the first place is self-protection, when should you stop shooting? Obviously when there is no more danger. But there is no magic number of shots that will tell you when you are out of danger.

Even if all your shots hit, that doesn’t mean anything if the other guy keeps coming and is still a danger. You can be killed by a wounded man.

David Horowitz skriver i Frontpage Magazine

Why isn’t anyone speaking the most obvious and most disturbing truth about what has been taking place in Ferguson? This is a lynch mob. It is unconcerned with the facts, impatient with due process, and it wants a severely injured officer who is probably the victim of a vicious criminal thug, indicted, tried and convicted or else. And the reason it wants him convicted is that he is white. This lynch mob even wants the prosecutor removed because his father was the victim of a black criminal 50 years ago.

This thuggery would be seen as classic lynch mob behavior except that it is composed mainly of blacks and its leaders include the Democrat Attorney General of the United States and the Democratic Governor the state of Missouri (on second thought this not so unusual). The mob is inflamed and abetted by an anti-white media that accepts the unfounded, actually ludicrous idea that unarmed black teens are regularly shot down in the streets by white police officers who are protected by a white supremacist power structure. As Bill O’Reilly courageously pointed out, there are approximately 12 million arrests every year in America and only 400 police shootings – and how many of these inspire criminal riots in the streets? Moreover, as O’Reilly did not mention, crime statistics show that a white person is 25 times more likely to be the victim of a violent crime committed by a black person than vice versa.

Og hvor der er en pøbel er der også nogle til at ægge pøblen skriver Jonah Goldberg i National Review

The rush to condemn Wilson’s conduct and the gallop to martyr Brown may have set land-speed records. The New Yorker, like numerous outlets, reported that Brown was walking to his grandmother’s home when confronted by Wilson. A video released from the by turns hapless and devious Ferguson Police Department alleges that he was actually walking from a thuggish and brazen shoplifting of a box of cigars from a convenience store.

That video is almost surely irrelevant to Wilson’s state of mind, since the police said he didn’t know about the shoplifting incident. It is, however, inconvenient from the martyrdom angle.

But don’t tell that to the legions of too-often-interchangeable activists, commentators, and reporters who have convinced themselves that we know exactly what happened, or at least all we need to know.

Al Sharpton, with decades of racial ambulance-chasing under his belt, insists that “America is on trial” in Ferguson.

Of course he does.

The New Black Panthers and the Nation of Islam claim that their groups control the situation in Ferguson. And the Ku Klux Klan is dipping its pillowcase-covered beak into this mess now, rounding out the whole legion of doom.

MSNBC’s Chris Hayes, with days of experience in such things under his belt, announced on Twitter, “I think the security problem in Ferguson is not solvable through policing. Until charges are brought against Wilson, this will go on.”

Mark Steyn er derimod kritisk overfor politiets kompetencer og selvbillede.

The point about “the thin blue line” is that it’s blue for a reason. As I wrote a couple of months ago:

“The police” is a phenomenon of the modern world. It would be wholly alien, for example, to America’s Founders. In the sense we use the term today, it dates back no further than Sir Robert Peel’s founding of the Metropolitan Police in 1829. Because Londoners associated the concept with French-style political policing and state control, they were very resistant to the idea of a domestic soldiery keeping them in line. So Peel dressed his policemen in blue instead of infantry red, and instead of guns they had wooden truncheons.

So, when the police are dressed like combat troops, it’s not a fashion faux pas, it’s a fundamental misunderstanding of who they are. Forget the armored vehicles with the gun turrets, forget the faceless, helmeted, anonymous Robocops, and just listen to how these “policemen” talk. Look at the video as they’re arresting the New York Times and Huffington Post reporters. Watch the St Louis County deputy ordering everyone to leave, and then adding: “This is not up for discussion.”

Really? You’re a constable. You may be carrying on like the military commander of an occupying army faced with a rabble of revolting natives, but in the end you’re a constable. And the fact that you and your colleagues in that McDonald’s are comfortable speaking to your fellow citizens like this is part of the problem. The most important of the “nine principles of good policing” (formulated by the first two commissioners of the Metropolitan Police in 1829 and thereafter issued to every officer joining the force) is a very simple one: The police are the public and the public are the police. Not in Ferguson. Long before the teargassing begins and the bullets start flying, the way these guys talk is the first indication of how the remorseless militarization has corroded the soul of American policing.

Which brings us back to the death of Michael Brown. Let’s assume for the sake of argument that everything the police say about this incident is correct. In that case, whether or not the fatal shooting of Mr Brown is a crime, it’s certainly a mistake. When an unarmed shoplifter* in T-shirt and shorts with a five-buck cigar box in one hand has to be shot dead, you’re doing it wrong.

American police have grown too comfortable with the routine use of lethal force. To reprise a few statistics I cited three months ago:

So the biggest government in the free world chooses not to keep statistics on how many people get shot by law enforcement. So be it. It does keep figures on “justifiable homicide”, which it defines as “the killing of a felon by a law enforcement official in the line of duty“. When is a police homicide not “justifiable”? Ah, well. At any rate, for 2012, the corpse count was 410.

By comparison, for the years 2012 and 2013 in England and Wales:

‘No fatal police shootings.’

In the Netherlands:

‘The average for the last 35 years is three dead and 15 injured…’

In Germany, a nation of 80 million people, police in 2011 fatally shot six persons. In Denmark, police shot 11 people in 11 years, and this was felt to be so disturbing that the National Police Commissioner held an inquiry into why his cops had gotten so trigger-happy. In Australia, 41 people were shot by police in eight years, and the then Justice Minister Amanda Vanstone (whose friend thinks I’m “eminently shaggable“, but I digress) thought that that was too high. In Iceland, police have fatally shot just one suspect. That’s one guy in the entire history of the country. He was killed by police last December.

So comparisons between the kill rates from American police and those of other developed nations aren’t worth bothering with. Indeed, the “justifiable homicides” of US cops are more like the total murder count for other advanced societies:

In Oz, the total number of murders per year is about 270, so a nation of 23 million would have to increase by 50 per cent to commit as many homicides as American law enforcement. In Canada, whose urban police departments have absorbed certain American practices, a dozen or so people get shot dead by cops each year, which is again somewhat short of the US rate. Indeed, that 2012 “justifiable homicide” figure of 410 compares to a total Canadian homicide count for 2011 of 598. In other words, in America 120,000 or so full-time law enforcement officers rack up the same number of homicides as about 24 million Canadians.

That strikes me as on the high side.

Et par dage senere blev endnu en ung sort mand skudt af politiet i Ferguson. Ifølge det venstredrejede Think Progress er politiets version, igen, ikke i overensstemmelse med virkeligheden.

On August 20, the police released a cell phone video of the shooting. The confrontation in the video appears to differ substantially from the official police account. The police had said the man — identified as Kajieme Powell — confronted them aggressively while holding a knife with an overhand grip. According to the initial account, Powell was shot when he was just three or four feet from the officers.

In the video, the officers also appear to handcuff Powell after he was killed.

Videoen kan ses HER. Og ligeledes i balancens navn, så er her et uvidenskabeligt eksperiment, der tilsyneladende viser at man reagerer forskelligt alt efter om folk er høje eller lave.

Men, som sorte amerikaneres reaktionsmønstre og vrede stammer fra erfaringerne med den hvide undertrykker, hvad tænker hvide så? Samtidig med skyderierne i Ferguson angreb en sort pøbel tre hvide studerende skrev American Thinker

To the four clean-cut college freshman out on a double date, it had seemed like a typical McDonald’s: spanking clean, well-lighted, and safe. It was in a good neighborhood too, right next to Texas A&M University in College Station – a campus known for its friendly atmosphere and official down-home greeting: “howdy.”

Shortly after 2 A.M. that Sunday, they pulled into the parking lot of so-called “University McDonald’s”  and beheld a scene unlike anything portrayed in all those wholesome McDonald’s television commercials. Before them, hundreds of young black males were loitering about, some without shirts.

Other local residents — the more cynical and world-weary, both whites and most blacks — would have taken one look at the crowd and driven off, dismissing many of the young and posturing black males as thugs. But not them: innocent white kids from the suburbs. They presumed this was post-racial America — and that they were in an easy-going college town.

Twenty minutes later, two of them were dead.

Og Frontpage Magazine kunne senere bringe et sort pøbels overfald på kunder og ansatte ved en døgnkiosk

“Hold on, they got a white dude.” And it sure seemed like fun — if the laughing and shrieking on this latest video of black mob violence is any indication.

This racial mayhem happened Saturday night in Memphis at a Kroger’s department store. WMCA Channel 5 out of Jackson, Mississippi picks up the story, all of it except the central organizing feature of the violence: All of the hundreds of people involved in the mayhem and violence are black. Except the victims. They are white:

“Three people were jumped by a large group of teenagers who were chanting ‘fam mob.’” The group, who came from CiCi’s Pizza, reportedly attacked a 25-year-old customer as he left his car to enter Kroger. Two employees, ages 17 and 18, were attacked while trying to stop the fight. Both were “struck several times in the head and face, while being knocked to the ground.” The victims say large pumpkins were thrown at their heads. They both eventually were knocked unconscious.”

However serious it seemed to the victims, the predators and their videographer were having a good time. Laughing and running.

Og senere kunne Obama, hvis han havde haft en søn, se ham og hans venner udføre en happy slapping

Danskerne har glade gener

Agurketid, Akademia, Multikultur, Race, Satire, Videnskab — Drokles on July 19, 2014 at 4:19 pm

Ifølge Daily Mail mener forskere fra the University of Warwick at danskerne er lykkeligere end andre folkeslag takket være vores gener. “Researchers who looked at survey data from 131 countries found that the closer a nation was genetically to the Danes, the happier its people were” hedder det i artiklen, hvilket vil sige at hvis du avler med en sur neger får du en mut mulat. Faktisk bliver vi kede af indvandring. Men dette billede slog mig efter at en ven havde påpeget det

article-0-1fb9a59400000578-548_634x501

6-7 af de afbildede danskere er ikke genetiske danskere (gener er forskernes differentiering, forskernes!) og burde ifølge videnskaben ikke smile så bredt.

Måske var det mere præcist at bruge dette billede af det multietniske Nørrebro der står sammen for deres mangfoldighed på Nørrebro

aktion_p__n_rrebro_671562y

gadefest_p__n_rrebr_680764a

Eller dette billede af den mangfoldigheds og multietnicitets forkæmpende bestyrelse for Enhedslisten

ab_1103

Kong Louie er udtryk for racisme

Akademia, Diverse, Race, Racisme — Drokles on May 1, 2014 at 7:01 pm

Disney har planer om endnu en filmatisering af Junglebogen, men denne gang med rigtige skuespillere. Og det får flere akademikere, der mener at aberne er en metafor for negrene, til at advare mod at inddrage figuren Kong Louie. Fra Daily Caller

The apes’ efforts to learn to be like humans is a racist metaphor for black people’s efforts to be more like white people, according to Amanda Bell of Yahoo Movies. The apes are, “Widely panned as exemplifying ‘negative racial stereotyping’ and connoting inequality between African-Americans and Caucasians,” she wrote.

The main problem? The ape leader, King Louie, was claimed by many to be a stand-in for the jazz musician Louis Armstrong, who was black.

“The original choice would have been offensive – Louis Armstrong animated as an ape,” said Robert Thompson, a media professor at Syrcause, in a statement. “The choice they went with had a minstrel show feel to it, also offensive.”

Bell suggested scrapping the King Louie character altogether

Godt man ikke skrottede Kong Louie fra den originale (læg mærke til den fine animering af Louies pels og kropsfedt) En bedre version der desværre ikke tillod indlejring HER)

Dyrerepræsentationer af allehånde mennesker og deriblandt også sorte er ikke ukendt for Disney. I filmen Dumbo er sorte krager og deres leder hedder endda Jim (Jim Crow), som i Jim Crow lovene om segregering

Også tegnefilmen Fritz the Cat fra 1972 (der ikke er Disney) valgte at lade krager repræsentere sorte

Men man behøver ikke dyrerepræsentationer, som denne lille klassiker om Lazy Town viser

Happy Days…

Mikro aggression i det akademiske

Daily Caller fortæller om et, for mig, nyt ord til at findele racisme

Racial tensions are inflamed at the University of California at Los Angeles following several incidents — most notably, one where a professor corrected the grammar, punctuation and capitalization in minority students’ assignments.

The act of correcting a black student was “micro-aggression,” according to the members of the student group “Call 2 Action: Graduate Students of Color,” which launched a sit-in during a subsequent meeting of the class.

Den bigote professor Val Rust prøvede at forsvare sit klare svigt

“I have attempted to be rather thorough on the papers and am particularly concerned that they do a good job with their bibliographies and citations, and these students apparently don’t feel that is appropriate,” he said in a statement, according to The Daily Bruin.

Some of the corrections were clarified by sit-in organizer Kenjus Watson. Rust told one student that she should not capitalize the word “indigenous” in her papers. This correction was ideologically-motivated, according to Watson.

Rust admitted that he likely made matters worse by not aggressively and proactively taking the side of a minority student who was engaged in an argument with a white female student. The minority student told the woman that she had no right to feel oppressed, and Rust did not express agreement either way.

Det er svært at forestille sig at man overhovedet kan forsvare sig mod en anklage om ‘mikro aggression’. Det ligner en portal til Salem. Følsomheden er sværere at spore den anden vej. Professor Noel Ignatiev’s makro aggressive udtryk møder ingen proteser i den akademiske verden (her fra en noget antisemitisk og vist nok også småracistisk hjemmeside)

(en satire, der er blevet taget for lidt for gode varer af alt for mange, over Ignatievs holdninger kan findes på Diversity Chronicle) En skør kugle gør selvfølgelig ingen sommer, men Ignatievs er rigt repræsenteret i forskellige variationer i de definerende klasser, akademiske som kvasiakademiske og som han selv fortæller, så møder han kun professionel og kollegial forståelse for sine rablerier.

Et lille logisk og bemærkelsesværdigt udslag af minoriteternes selvretfærdiggørelse kombineret med de definerende klassers defamering af “hvidhed” og hvides følgende skyldkompleks er det såkaldte “knockout game”, sorte teenagere, i medierne blot  ’teenagere’ som uoverlagt og uden varsel slår hvide forbipasserende ned, skriver Frontpage Magazine

For those unfamiliar with the knockout game, it’s how some black youths amuse themselves, especially in urban settings. The goal: use a single devastating punch to knock a victim unconscious. And when they succeed, they invariably react with merriment and laughter, as videos capturing the mayhem have revealed. Could racism be motivating these black youths? Nobody in the mainstream media dares suggest that this might be fueling the black mob violence in what President Obama said would be a post-racial era.

The knockout game, to be sure, has been around a few years. It has been mostly ignored by the mainstream media, which generally airbrushes out the black-on-white nature of the mayhem.

No, it’s not a macho thing, its a black thing.

En lille undersøgelse fra forleden fortalte at 6 af 10 danske danskere var bange for at møde grupper af unge muslimske mænd, i medierne ‘unge med indvandrerbaggrund, på gaden. En hurtig analyse siger følgeligt at 4 af 10 lyver - for sig selv eller for spørgeskemaet. Fortællingen om at racisme er en iboende karakterbrist specifikt hos hvide sidder så fast at end ikke dygtige satirikere evner andet end et stereotypt opgør med stereotyper.

Amerika har tabt og det har jeg også

Race, USA, venstrefløjen, Økonomi og finans — Sobieski on November 8, 2012 at 1:26 pm

Med henvisning til dette væddemål må jeg nu krybe til korset og erkende mit nederlag. Se denne postering: Romney, et sikkert bet . Det drejer sig om et økonomisk tab på det fyrstelige beløb af 500 kroner.

bet_on_romney1

Havde jeg investeret samme beløb i Mitt Romneys tidligere investerings selskab Bain Capital i 1984, ville afkastet i 1998 have været et sted mellem 145.964,63 og 1.874.066,84 kr. Nå, men nu har nyhedsformidlerne, den fjerde statsmagt, jo informeret os om at Romney er en kapitalistisk barracuda der stjæler maden fra de sultne børn og meget andet, så mon ikke det var bedst at holde sig på god afstand af ham. Penge er jo ikke… øh… alting…

Obama vandt valget 50% til 48%, altså et 2% forspring, hvilket er et betydeligt ringere resultat end i 2008. Ser man på valgresultatet fordelt på etnisk tilhørsforhold, fremtræder der nogle foruroligende trends. Ifølge CNN:

Vælgere som stemte på Obama -

Sorte amerikanere = 93 %

Latinoer = 71 %

Asiater = 73 %

Hvide amerikanere = 40%

Tre-og-halvfems-procent, 93 ud af 100, smag lige på det tal, altså 93 % af negerne stemte på deres neger. Fremtiden er sandelig baseret på stammesamfund.
Når 93 % stemmer på deres egen hudfarve, så er der ikke længere tale om et robust demokrati. Nej, der er tale om at bruge demokratiet til at partitionere samfundet.
Se evt. sagen fra Egedalsvænge fra det etnisk problemsområde i Kokkedal: Ballade i boligforening: Muslimer nægter ikke-muslimer juletræ. Her træffer muslimer i boligbestyrelsen en demokratisk beslutning om ikke at fortsætte en kristen tradition, men at indføre en muslimsk tradition til en 10 gange højere pris. Boligforeningen er med garanti almennyttig og skatteyderfinansieret via tilskud og boligstøtte. Danskeren betaler prisen i juletræer og udgiften i skattekroner. Stick it to whitey .

I øvrigt: Over for ekstrabladet.dk afviser Ismal Sahan, som er bestyrelsesmedlem i beboerforeningen, kritikken af det skrottede juletræ.

“Vi har taget beslutningen sammen med alle i bestyrelsen, som har stemt for (at droppe juletræet, red.). Det er demokrati. Men det kommer ikke andre ved,” siger han.

Konservatismen har altid haft et stormfuldt forhold til demokratiet, og hvordan kan det også være anderledes, da demokratiet ikke er bedre end de folk der udøver det. Barbariske mennesker skaber altid barbariske resultater uanset midlerne.

Det siges også at Amerika i 2012 er væsentligt anderledes end Amerika i 2002. Lander er blevet ‘brunere’ siges det (dvs. flere mexicanere) og derfor må det nødvendigvis gøre alting vanskeligere for republikanerne. Denne præmis bliver mærkelig nok ikke problematiseret af mainstream medierne, der dog finder tid til at hæfte sig ved, at hvide mænd overvejende stemte på Romney. Og nej, ikke noget der bare ligne 93 %. Stick it to whitey .

61% af de hvide har stemt republikansk og det betyder at der inden for den demografiske gruppe er en signifikant uenighed om politiske principper. Denne uenighed forsvinder jo ‘brunere’ det ser ud. Dette er ikke en klam racistisk udtalelse, men en indlysende trend. Demokraterne har med stor held og dygtighed udnyttet klassekamp og identitetspolitik (en eufemisme for racepolitik) til at opnå monopol på de sorte stemmer og i lidt mindre grad andre ‘brune’ stemmer. Ved hjælp af store socialprogrammer, leflen for latinoerne og løfter om en endnu nemmere adgang til amerikanske velfærdsydelser for ulovlige indtrængere, har Obama sikret sig en afgørende strategisk fordel. Regningen betales selvfølgelig af hårdtarbejdende mennesker, der ved at anvende deres talent høster en profit der kan beskattes. Stick it to whitey .

At USA er blevet ‘brunere’ burde ret beset ikke have nogen politisk betydning, hvis man går frem efter en idealdemokratisk model, hvor vælgeren konsulterer sin samvittighed, sine omstændigheder, sine omgivelser og træffer et informeret valg. Dette ideal er sten dødt. Republikanerne skal opstille en halvt sort, halvt latino kvinde med indiansk blod i årene, for bare at have en kinamands chance for at opnå præsidentembedet.
De amerikanske idealer og værdier (som er universelle) eksisterer stadigvæk som man finder dem i Uafhængighedserklæringen af 1776 og i forfatningen, men det er ikke givet at de fortsat vil have rod i det USA der er ved at tone frem. I en svunden tid var præsidentens fremmeste opgave at forsvare forfatningen og tage sig af udenrigspolitiske forhold. Kongressen måtte sørge for indenrigspolitik og finanserne, og præsidenten havde mulighed for at bremse de værste eksesser. Efter 2008 blev præsidentens rolle at tækkes de ‘brune’ racer. Stick it to whitey .

Den engelske historiker og adelsmand Thomas Babington Macaulay frygtede, at den demokratiske stat ultimativt ville fejle, da flertallet ville have en tendens til at stemme flere goder hjem til sig selv på bekostning af fremtiden. De ville æde såsæden, og den nød man søgte at lettede i dag ville blive til en hungerskatastrofe i morgen.

Pt. er Amerikas statsgæld på 16.220.354.041.129,- US Dollars. Den største gældsbyrde nogensinde.

« Previous Page

Monokultur kører på WordPress