Negerderoute

Diverse, Forbrydelse og straf, Multikultur, Race, Racisme, venstrefløjen — Drokles on November 20, 2014 at 1:13 pm

Vi venter i spænding på dommen i Ferguson, hvor en politimand står anklaget for at have skudt en ubevæbnet teenager. En sort teenager, hvorfor der er store spændinger, som venstrefløjen elsker at opdyrke. Det er noget med strukturel racisme og undertrykte masser og minoriteter på een og samme gang. Jeg kom til at tænke på, hvor langt USA egentlig er nået i forholdet mellem sorte og hvide siden slaveriet blev ophævet da Daily Mail forleden viste nogle billeder fra en svunden tid med segregering i de amerikanske sydstater.

1415915696272_wps_2_must_link_back_to_site_ht

1415915696285_wps_4_must_link_back_to_site_ht

1415915696332_wps_11_must_link_back_to_site_ht

Billederne er fra Alabama og er taget af Gordon Parks i 1956. De vidner om en tid med institutionaliseret racisme og det midt i den frie verden. Ikke alting var bedre i gamle dage. Men som det fremgår af billederne, så fremstod sorte amerikanere med en værdighed, der trodsede det uværdige system, der holdt dem som 2. rangs borgere. Negre var mennesker og derfor også borgere og borgere måtte have rettigheder. Borgerretsbevægelsen havde ret, helt ret.

Men bevægelsens succes fik sit eget liv og et momentum, som ikke lod sig stoppe. Revolutionen skulle snart æde sine børn. For ligeret blev til krav om ligemageri og værdighed blev fortrængt af berettigelse. En fortælling om slaveri og undertrykkelse blev en identitet, retfærdighed blev til selvretfærdighed. Thomas Sowell skriver i National Review Online

Despite the grand myth that black economic progress began or accelerated with the passage of the Civil Rights laws and “War on Poverty” programs of the 1960s, the cold fact is that the poverty rate among blacks fell from 87 percent in 1940 to 47 percent by 1960. This was before any of those programs began.

Over the next 20 years, the poverty rate among blacks fell another 18 percentage points, compared to the 40-point drop in the previous 20 years. This was the continuation of a previous economic trend, at a slower rate of progress, not the economic grand deliverance proclaimed by liberals and self-serving black “leaders.”

Ending the Jim Crow laws was a landmark achievement. But, despite the great proliferation of black political and other “leaders” that resulted from the laws and policies of the 1960s, nothing comparable happened economically. And there were serious retrogressions socially.

Nearly a hundred years of the supposed “legacy of slavery” found most black children being raised in two-parent families in 1960. But thirty years after the liberal welfare state found the great majority of black children being raised by a single parent.

The murder rate among blacks in 1960 was one-half of what it became 20 years later, after a legacy of liberals’ law-enforcement policies. Public-housing projects in the first half of the 20th century were clean, safe places, where people slept outside on hot summer nights, when they were too poor to afford air conditioning. That was before admissions standards for public-housing projects were lowered or abandoned, in the euphoria of liberal non-judgmental notions. And it was before the toxic message of victimhood was spread by liberals. We all know what hell holes public housing has become in our times. The same toxic message produced similar social results among lower-income people in England, despite an absence of a “legacy of slavery” there.

If we are to go by evidence of social retrogression, liberals have wreaked more havoc on blacks than the supposed “legacy of slavery” they talk about. Liberals should heed the title of Jason Riley’s insightful new book, Please Stop Helping Us.

Og i samme periode faldt den ellers stabile sorte famile fra hinanden, som man kan læse hos Discover The Networks

Illegitimacy is an important issue because it has a great influence on all statistical indicators of a population group’s progress or decline. In 1987, for the first time in the history of any American racial or ethnic group, the birth rate for unmarried black women surpassed that for married black women, and that trend continued uninterrupted until the passage of welfare reform. The black out-of-wedlock birth rates in some inner cities now exceed 80 percent, and most of those mothers are teens. Because unmarried teenage mothers—whatever their race—typically have no steady employment, nearly 80 percent of them apply for welfare benefits within five years after giving birth to their first child. No group can withstand such a wholesale collapse of its family structure without experiencing devastating social consequences.

Father-absent families—black and white alike—generally occupy the bottom rung of our society’s economic ladder. Unwed mothers, regardless of their race, are four times more likely to live in poverty than the average American. Female-headed black families earn only 36 percent as much as two-parent black families, and female-headed white families earn just 46 percent as much as two-parent white families. Not only do unmarried mothers tend to earn relatively little, but their households are obviously limited to a single breadwinner—thus further widening the income gap between one-parent and two-parent families. Fully 85 percent of all black children in poverty live in single-parent, mother-child homes.

(…)

Children in single-parent households are raised not only with economic, but also social and psychological, disadvantages. For instance, they are four times as likely as children from intact families to be abused or neglected; much likelier to have trouble academically; twice as prone to drop out of school; three times more likely to have behavioral problems; much more apt to experience emotional disorders; far likelier to have a weak sense right and wrong; significantly less able to delay gratification and to control their violent or sexual impulses; two-and-a-half times likelier to be sexually active as teens; approximately twice as likely to conceive children out-of-wedlock when they are teens or young adults; and three times likelier to be on welfare when they reach adulthood.

In addition, growing up without a father is a far better forecaster of a boy’s future criminality than either race or poverty. Regardless of race, 70 percent of all young people in state reform institutions were raised in fatherless homes, as were 60 percent of rapists, 72 percent of adolescent murderers, and 70 percent of long-term prison inmates. As Heritage Foundation scholar Robert Rector has noted, “Illegitimacy is a major factor in America’s crime problem. Lack of married parents, rather than race or poverty, is the principal factor in the crime rate.”

Since the black illegitimacy rate is so high, these pathologies plague blacks more than they affect any other demographic. “Even if white people were to become morally rejuvenated tomorrow,” writes black economist and professor Walter E. Williams, “it would do nothing for the problems plaguing a large segment of the black community. Illegitimacy, family breakdown, crime, and fraudulent education are devastating problems, but they are not civil rights problems.”

(…)

It bears mention that the astronomical illegitimacy rate among African Americans is a relatively recent phenomenon. As late as 1950, black women nationwide were more likely to be married than white women, and only 9 percent of black families with children were headed by a single parent. In the 1950s, black children had a 52 percent chance of living with both their biological parents until age seventeen; by the 1980s those odds had dwindled to a mere 6 percent. In 1959, only 2 percent of black children were reared in households in which the mother never married; today that figure approaches 60 percent.

The destruction of this stable black family was set in motion by the policies and teachings of the left, which for decades have encouraged blacks to view themselves as outcasts from a hostile American society; to identify themselves as perpetual victims who are entitled to compensatory privileges designed to “level the playing field” in a land where discrimination would otherwise run rampant; and to reject “white” norms and traditions as part and parcel of the “racist” culture that allegedly despises blacks.

Dyrkelsen af en sort kultur er ikke stort andet end et vræng, af de aspirationer, der drev borgerretsbevægelsen.

Rosa Parks ville ikke sidde på en bestemt plads i bussen. Hun ville sidde som et hvert andet menneske, ikke som en neger.

Kulturen, naturen og fremmedlegemet

Guardian fortæller om en heltemodig katolsk præst Fader Kinvi i Congo, der med fare for sit liv redder muslimer fra animistiske militsers hævnangreb. Fader Kinvi tror på “the contagion of love” og det kræver mere end almindelig vilje midt i sekteriske blodigheder. Og det er et af menneskets fineste egenskaber. Men det er idioti ikke. Og idioti er at invitere hadet indenfor og med vilje og magt konstruere forudsætningerne for sekterisk vold. Og ondskab er at forråde og bekæmpe sin egen befolkning, mens man konstruerer sin fremtidige sekteriske samfund

Fader Kinvi redder mennesker i nød fordi troen på næstekærlighed er stærk i ham. Men det er ikke næstekærlighed at ophøje fjendtlige ideologier til ligeværdighed. En kvinde blev eskorteret ud af The National Cathedral i Washington for at protestere over at den blev brugt til et muslimsk arrangement. Robert Spencer støtter kvindens argumentation i, hvor direkte antikristent islam og islamiske bønner er på Jihad Watch og skriver

It all sounds so high-minded: the Rev. Canon Gina Campbell says: “This needs to be a world in which all are free to believe and practice and in which we avoid bigotry, Islamaphobia, racism, anti-Semitism, and anti-Christianity and to embrace our humanity and to embrace faith.”

But someone threw a rotting cabbage on their lovely sofa, as DCist laments: “And because love, respect and understanding is too much of a concept for some people to understand, a person interrupted the service. Of course.” Still, the spectacle of a woman being forcibly ejected from what is ostensibly a Christian cathedral for proclaiming that Jesus Christ is Lord just before Muslim prayers are about to begin is at very least evidence that we live in strange times.

(…)

In light of all that, and the ongoing and escalating Muslim persecution of Christians worldwide, wouldn’t it have been more appropriate, so as to promote love, respect and understanding and all that, to have Christian prayers in a mosque? After all, it is Muslims who are persecuting Christians worldwide, and the National Cathedral decides to show its good will and love for Muslims by inviting Hamas-linked Muslim Brotherhood front groups to pray there. Why doesn’t the ADAMS Center show its good will and love for Christians by inviting Christians to pray in the mosque there?

This woman who disrupted the service was upset that a building dedicated to the worship of Christ had been given over for the use of people who believe that her proclamation of Christ is a blasphemous falsehood and that her beliefs are a perversion of the true teachings of Jesus the Muslim prophet.

Den muslimske bønneleder talte derefter for den amerikanske kongres hvor han også ledte bønnen, skriver Freedom Outpost

With newly re-elected Speaker of the House John Boehner presiding AND BOWING HIS HEAD, the Imam for the Islamic Center of Central Jersey praised Islam’s Allah from the House floor as the God who reigns supreme. Here is the shocking video of Imam Hamad Chebli delivering the Islamic prayer; Boehner can be seen behind him

We’re not talking about a harmless, moderate Imam here. Instead, we’re talking about a major devil.

(…)

The selection of Chelbi also appears to have significance relative to the U.S. policy in Syria. Both his mentor Khaled – and Khaled’s father – were killed by the Syrian regime. As such, Chelbi has an axe to grind when it comes to Bashar al-Assad. With news that the Obama administration is actually considering a policy based on an absurd premise that the best way to defeat ISIS is to remove Assad from power, Chelbi’s appearance at locations of national significance seem to coincide with this potential shift in U.S. policy.

Despite western portrayals of Chelbi as a moderate, he absolutely is not.

When it comes to Muslim prayers being delivered on the House floor or at the National Cathedral, unfortunately, this is not new. The precedent was set by Boehner’s predecessor – Speaker Dennis Hastert – less than one year prior to 9/11. As for the National Cathedral, none other than President George W. Bush shared a podium with Muzammil Siddiqi, then president of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA).

First up, on February 7, 2001, Chairman of the Dar al-Hijrah mosque Bassam Estwani delivered a prayer on the floor of the House as well. As the chairman of Dar al-Hijrah, Estwani represented perhaps the most notorious mosque on American soil. It was visited by three of the 9/11 hijackers and was home to Anwar al-Awlaki, the inspiration for the Fort Hood shooter. Estwani was the chairman of the mosque at that time:

Mennesket er rundet af sin kultur. Det har visioner, overvejelser og håb og frygt. Naturen har kun konsekvens.

Tid for vold

Det er søndag, det blæser en stiv pelikan og det er koldt og vådt, så måske er det tid til en bulgarsk film om Balkans erfaringer med Osmannerriget?

A Bulgarian film, Time of Violence uses precisely the same stylistic conventions as American films, the same form of storytelling, the same approach to character, the same values as to what makes a good story, and, moreover, it satisfies American criteria for being a good movie. There is a basic story, with well-attached subplots, lots of action, villains and heros (with a bit more complexity, perhaps, than most American films), and a logical resolution. The production values are high, the performances excellent, the direction skillful. The film has done very well in many countries, including some as foreign to Bulgarian culture as Japan. So why can’t the filmmakers get any distribution deal in the U.S.?

Time of Violence suffers only from its language and its setting. Few Americans know much about the Balkans during the 17th century. But it was one of those proverbial “interesting” times during which it was a curse to live. Most of the Balkans were under the thumb of the Ottoman empire. Islamic empires have more of a reputation for tolerance than most, but the Ottoman empire was showing its ugliest face during this period in Bulgaria. Bulgaria was a strategically important area inhabited by unreliable Christian subjects. The sultan decided that they must all convert to Islam, or die.

Time of Violence focuses on the fate of one valley during this crisis. The son of the miller was taken off by the Turks years ago, while still a boy, to become a janissary. Janissaries were special troops used by the Ottomans. Recruited (involuntarily) from Christian boys, they were separated from their families at an early age, indoctrinated in Islam, and turned into fiercely reliable troops with no allegiance to anyone but the sultan. The miller’s son is now a highly trusted janissary, with the task of converting his entire home valley to Islam. But the people there take their religion very seriously, and will not submit. The janissary becomes more and more brutal in his attempts to convert the valley, for he must slaughter them all if they don’t take the turban.

The film is painted on a large, sweeping canvas, with many characters and subplots, all cleverly woven into a single story. (This accomplishment is even more remarkable when you consider that the original Bulgarian version was nearly two hours longer, yet there is no sign at all that anything has been cut.) And, surprisingly, this isn’t a “vile Turk” story. Director Ludmil Staikov has much more ambitious goals, including an examination of the power of religion and of the destructiveness of violence and fanaticism. Not all of the Christians are good, nor all of the Muslims bad. The Turkish governor of the valley is not loved by his subjects, yet does all he can to avert their doom. He is given a beautiful, tender moment as he leaves the valley forever, in disgrace. Crossing a bridge that leads out of his valley, he notices a stone that has worked out of place. He gets down from his horse, carefully puts the stone back into its place, and then proceeds on to his exile. Even the janissary has his complexities, as he truly wants to spare his people from unnecessary pain, despite having completely transferred his loyalties to the sultan. The screenplay, by Staikov, Georgi Danailov, Mihail Kirkov, and Radoslav Spassov, provides complex shadings of characters and motivations.

Time of Violence is a professionally made film, beautifully photographed, well edited, and with scrupulous care in costuming and set design. The period atmosphere feels perfectly authentic, at least to someone with only passing familiarity with the time and place. The technical aspects of the film are well up to the standard of moderate budget Hollywood movies.

There are some unpleasant moments of torture and brutality in Time of Violence, but they do not exist to excite or titillate. Rather, they are necessary to demonstrate the full scope of the tragedy. Still, some viewers may find themselves looking away during certain scenes. But, otherwise, Time of Violence is a film without flaws. There are no particularly weak points in the film, and many great virtues.

Lille quiz

Akademia, Information, Race, Racisme, Satire, venstrefløjen — Drokles on November 16, 2014 at 2:15 am

Hvad er satire, hvad er ikke? Først en historie

I et voldeligt og sygdomsplaget land sidder en person, som ingen i Danmark har hørt om, og har det virkelig hårdt. Vedkommende har ikke spist i flere dage og ønsker knap at overleve i sin krigshærgede hjemby; tanken om et nyt liv i et andet land er meget fjern.

Ingen danske politikere kerer sig dog om denne triste skæbne.

“Nej, jeg har ingen planer om at hjælpe, medmindre vedkommende har tænkt sig at flygte til Danmark,” udtaler justitsminister Mette Frederiksen, idet hun understreger, at næstekærlighed er en vanskelig størrelse, og at vi skal hjælpe i nærområderne.

Kun spændende grupper
Det samme gælder for handels- og udviklingsminister Mogens Jensen, der dog kunne være interesseret, hvis den fattige person tilhører en spændende gruppe, fx unge kvinder mellem 20-30 år, der ønsker mikrolån, eller sekulære oprørere fra Mellemøsten, der skriver godt engelsk.

“Hvis man kan skrive et skarpt læserbrev, som en praktikant på en af morgenaviserne eller DR kan oversætte til dansk, har man en chance for, at vi gider tage det op. Men læserbrevet skal ikke bare handle om kedelige ting i Syrien eller Irak; der skal gerne være en kobling til dansk politik, hvor vi fremstår fremsynede og humane, mens fx Dansk Folkeparti fremstår fremmedfjendske og tilbagestående,” forklarer Mogens Jensen.

Så et indlæg

Racister er vi alle. Det er en nødvendig konsekvens af vores historie, som gennem tusinde år har dyrket et farvehierarki. Konsekvensen af den racismeblindhed, som bliver dyrket i fetichlignende grad for tiden, er, at racismen trives endnu bedre.

(…)

Selve proklamationen ’jeg er ikke-racist’, er racistisk. Hvis du er hvid og kalder dig ikke-racist, insisterer du på, at du ved, hvad racisme er, og i hvert fald hvor det ikke er.

Næste skridt er at kalde minoriteter for overfølsomme, for hvis du ikke er racist, og nogen bliver stødt af, hvad du (eller nogen du minder om) gør eller siger, kan det umuligt være dig, den er gal med. Du har jo højt og helligt sværget, at du ikke er racist.

(…)

Man udøver den magt, som den hvide mand igen og igen har udøvet gennem historien: Man producerer og reproducerer racer, stereotyper og en brun persons udanskhed.

Masochistiske magtudøvelser

Hvide menneskers dyrkelse af deres egen ikke-racisme er en demonstrativ magtudøvelse. Man demonstrerer sin magt til at definere sin magt til at positionere sin magt til at legitimere.

Man definerer den brune som dansk/ikke dansk ved at tale om denne som enten ’indvandrer og efterkommer,’ eller som ’du-er-jo-dansk,’ som oftest i en kombination. Budskabet bliver: Du er dansk, men ikke rigtig-dansk. Det er den hvide, som bestemmer, hvilken kategori den brune tilhører.

(…)

Først når man anerkender det; anerkender, at nogle farver har tilhørende privilegier, mens andre ikke har, kan man begynde at snakke om anti-racisme. Kategorien ’ikke-racist’ er en umulig kategori i vores tid.

Kun ved at sætte sig ind i, hvad racisme egentlig er, og hvordan man selv er en del af problemet, kan man begynde at fornemme en løsning: At stoppe med at udøve den magt, man har på baggrund af sin privilegerede position. Den eneste magt, man som hvid person mister ved dette, er magten til at undertrykke. Og man kan endda genoptage den, når som helst man vil, for det er et af privilegierne, ved at være hvid.

Når man påstår menneskers lighed, kan man kun gøre det som en moralsk dom. Det eneste lige mellem hvide og brune mennesker er deres værdi. En sådan påstand er en holdning, man må tage op med sig selv, om man kan erklære sig enig i eller ej. Men så længe man er overbevist om, at hvide og brune mennesker har lige muligheder, udøver man en magt, som vedligeholder hvidt hegemoni.

Hvis de eksisterende magtstrukturer skal ændres, må vi erkende, at vi altid selv har en rolle, ud fra hvordan vi er givet til situationen.

Er du hvid, har du højest sandsynligt privilegier. Er du brun, har du højest sandsynligt ikke de samme privilegier.

Jeg vil ikke legitimeres af en hvid person – jeg vil ikke overrækkes min danskhed, jeg vil ikke have at vide, at jeg skal se det som en god ting, at jeg er eksotisk, og jeg vil ikke have at vide, at jeg ikke skal skamme mig over min baggrund, når jeg nægter at dele mit stamtræ med fremmede, hvide mennesker.

Vi er alle sammen ofre, brune som hvide, for den racisme, vi selv holder på, da den er et uomgængeligt produkt af vores historie og vores samfund. Men vi er ikke alle ofre for racisme.

Hvad er Rokokoposten, hvad er Information?

Set på Uriasposten

Træt af at være forkælet

I Ekstra Bladet kunne man læse noget så fantastisk som hvad der gjorde en global meningsdanner træt. Svaret var det at være ung i Danmark. Bemærkelsesværdigt handlede det ikke om at drikke  mange øl, noget unge danskere er gode til og som gør een træt. Nej, den globale meningsdanner er træt af at Anders Fogh ladet ordet ’rundkredspædagogik’ så negativt, at Morten Østergaard har skåret i SUen, at Women against Feminism bliver større, træt af multinationale selskaber og PiaKjærsgaard.

Den globale meningsdanner er 18 år og hedder Sophie W og hun er global meningsdanner for Mellemfolkeligt Samvirke. Jeg ved ærligt talt ikke, hvad det betyder, men det er ironisk både at høre, hvad der gør unge mennesker trætte og at det globale er rent danske forhold. Vi kan trøste med at ungdom kun er en overgang. Om få år, og de går hurtigt min pige, vil du savne ungdommen og den ulidelige træthed når du som os andre ruiner kæmper med nedslidthed.

Men vi vil også komme med en lille advarsel, hvis Sophie W skulle bevæge sig uden for sit mellemfolkelige samvirke, for danske unge har det globalt set bedre end så mange andre. Et par eksempler fra samme dags rundtur på nettet viser at det også kan være trættende at være ung inder i England som Daily Mail skriver

This photo shows the horrific injuries a Sikh woman suffered after being attacked by her father-in-law because he thought she was having an affair with a Muslim man.

Jageer Mirgind was left blind and scarred for life after 51-year-old Manjit Mirgind slashed her wrists and stabbed her in the eyes screaming ‘I am going to kill you’.

Mrs Mirgind’s children, just three and six years old, watched the horrific attack at their mother’s home in Kensington Gardens, Ilford, East London, and pleaded with their grandfather to stop.

The mother has been left partially-sighted in both eyes while the children can no longer sleep alone and have recurring nightmares.

The crazed attacker wrongly believed his daughter-in-law was ’sleeping with a Paki’ and that she had ‘ruined his family’, Snaresbrook Crown Court heard.

article-2652927-1ea29d7f00000578-584_634x425

Det er også trættende at være ung fra negerland som The Express skriver

The mutilation, a traditional practice in the west African republic of Cameroon, aims to deter unwanted male attention, pregnancy and rape by delaying the signs that a girl is becoming a woman.

Experts believe the custom is being practised among the several thousand Cameroonians living in Britain. Schools are training staff to look out for signs of the barbaric practice. The move follows heightened awareness of female genital mutilation.

Campaigners want to see the same prominence given to other forms of cultural abuse, such as breast ironing. Margaret Nyuydzewira, co-founder of the charity CAME Women’s And Girl’s Development Organisation, says authorities need to take action faster than they have on stopping FGM in the UK.

Trættende at være ung i Iran

Trættende af være ung pige i Ægypten

Vi frygter at ikke danske unge ville møde Sophie Ws træthed med alt fra manglende empati henover dummeflade til en decideret dragt prygl.

batman

Israelsk og palæstinensisk sang

Antisemitisme, Arabere, Hamas, Israel, Jihad, Kunst og kultur, Multikultur, Muslimer, Terror, islam, muhammed — Drokles on November 12, 2014 at 9:52 am

Fra Israel

Fra palæstinenserne

Rørende.

Modkrafts venstrefløj og ytringsfriheden

Ytringsfrihed for Modkraft i streg

10405529_10152760821713911_6620927578183310762_n

Tegningen er ansporet af debatten om den svenske gadekunstner (eller gadesatiriker, som jeg i mit regressive kunstsyn mener er en bedre betegnelse) Dan Park. Man kan sagtens se den i den sammenhæng, som en ikke særligt vellykket kommentar til en konkret debat. Men det kræver som minimum velvijle. Den ejer venstrefløjen dog ikke selv, men har derimod masse af modvilje.

Som man kan se, indholder Modkrafts ellers teknisk gode tegning end ikke en antydning af tvetydighed, som præger Parks værker. Det er en projektion af et vulgært og ensidigt udtryk, som de omvendt fejlagtig beskylder Dan Park for at gøre sig skyldig i. Både Galleri Svinestien og Entartete Kunst har glimrende analyser af nogle af Parks mere omtalte værker.

Nazikunstner hyldes nær Breiviks gerningssted” hed en dramatisk overskrift på Modkraft tilbage i midten af oktober. Og indtil jeg læste første sætning troede jeg fejlagtigt at artiklens forfatter Joakim Møllersen havde en historie

Den indvandringsfjendtlige hjemmeside document.no har inviteret den svenske tegner Lars Vilks til torsdag den 23. oktober at holde en forsvarstale for den dømte svenske nazist Dan Park på Deichmanske bibliotek, Norges største offentlige bibliotek.

Nazisten Dan Park er hadefuld får vi betryggende for vores simple forestillinger at vide og han “har stået bag alt fra hyldest af Adolf Hitler og Anders Behring Breivik til holocaustfornægtelse og jødehetz“.Og hans værker får som en del af oplysningsforpligtelsen en lettere retoriske behandling

Det drejer sig blandt andet om små billeder med hakekors på samt dåser med påskriften ‘Zyklon B’, navnet på den gas der blev brugt til at dræbe jøder i gaskamrene i udrydelseslejren Auschwitz, der er blevet hængt op udenfor et jødisk forsamlingshus i Malmø. En handling, der forståelig nok har skabt frygt og bekymring i meningheden samt i det jødiske miljø i den svenske by.

Selv om Park har en hang for at hetze jøder begrænser han sig ikke til det.

Også afrikanere, muslimer og romer er blevet udsat for hans hadefulde budskab. Park har udtalt at han »elsker at lave sjov med død og mord«.

Dette giver sig udtryk i løkker rundt halsen på navngivne personer, deres ansigter i geværsigtekorn og hyldester til massemordere. Det i tillæg til ekstremt racistiske og fornærmende animationer.

Som en god ven tørt konstaterede venter man flere af den slags historier som “Modkraft kulegraver nazirockgruppen Rammstein”og afsløringen af hvem der står bag nazifilmen Diktatoren. Og hvad skal man dog ikke mene om Bruno Ganz, der i Der Untergangs samfulde to timer ikke bestiller andet end at tale Hitler efter munden?

Verden er entydig for Modkraft. I en anden artikel forsøger Modkraft at dokumentere og uddybe deres parodi

Således har Dan Park deltaget i flere demonstrationer indkaldt af det voldelige, nynazistiske Svenskernes Parti og har optrådt i en t-shirt med en smiley med et Hitler-lignende overskæg, ligesom han har lavet plakater, der udtrykker sympati for både Adolf Hitler og den fascistiske norske massemorder Anders Behring Breivik.

danparksvp_0

Dan Park (bagerst med en blå pose) til demonstration med det nynazistiske Svenskernes Parti. Foto: Redox.” er beskrivelsen af en elefant i rummet. ‘Bagerst med blå pose’ ligner Dan Park en der hører hjemme blandt de barske og trinde højreradikale, som ja, en Hitlermoustache på en smiley.

9780141039503

Get it? Artiklen med denne ekstra dokumentation af Parks sorte virke var foranlediget af en demonstration formand for African Empowerment Center Danmark, Josef W. Nielsen (der mere end let bliver ked af det) havde indkaldt til imod Trykkefrihedsselskabets udstilling af Dan Parks forbudte værker. Og ved netop den demonstration opstod der et lille bizart optrin, da Josef W. Nielsen lod sig provokere af en ældre herres kommentarer

Nu var det jo ikke Modkraft med de røde faner og nitterne i ansigtet, men rimeligvis læserskaren. Men  optrinnet mindede mig om pifteaktionen 1. maj mod Statsminister Helle Thorning Schmidt, hvor man netop i Modkraft argumenterede for at det er demokratisk at overdøve modstanderen, som altså er socialdemokratiet. Argumentet hang på at hvis der var nogen man ikke kunne lide var »demokratiske metoder« i anførselstegn at gå ind på ”borgerliges præmisser”. Socialdemokratiet blev stemplet ude af fællesskabet trods det at pifteaktionen var i klart mindretal blandt de resterende svedende masser. Me  er det ikke blot historien om venstrefløjen? Selv med en megafon råbende ind i ansigtet på en ældre herre føler man sig ikke hørt. For dem er andre ytringsfrihed blot bræk.

Når ulve hyler III

Debatten om mænds tilråb til shoshana Roberts vuggende vandring i New Yorks gader burde egentlig også have en dansk udgave. Men som en anden Radio 24/7 vil jeg blot opfordre andre til den slags. I USA har det nemlig ramt venstrefløjen hårdt i den kognitive dissonans. Sexchikane er primært et sort og brunt fænomen og hvorledes finder man så en hvid, kristen mandlige kapitalistisk skurk at bebrejde?

Men helt uden sammenhæng i øvrigt fik jeg lige en strøtanke, der ikke har noget med noget at gøre. Her demonstrerer venstrefløjen nemlig for flere muslimer under parolen “Her er plads”

asyldemo_stop_deportations-11

Men tilbage til seksuel chikane af kvinder på gaden, for det ligger naturligvis og ganske beundringsværdigt venstrefløjen så meget på sinde. Derfor skulle der arrangeres en demonstration i kølvandet på “to voldsomme gadeoverfald på i alt fem personer med forbindelse til den politiske venstrefløjen, der er fundet sted med en uges mellemrum i bydelen i september” skrev Modkraft

Af en artikel bragt på hjemmesiden ProjektAntifa.dk fremgår det, at den første voldsepisode fandt sted om aftenen den lørdag den 20. september, da tre kvinder befinder sig i området omkring Møllegade og Guldbergsgade.

»Kvinderne bliver passet op af en mand, som først agerede venligsindet, men bliver aggressiv i det øjeblik han antager dem for at være lesbiske. Først bliver kvinderne chikaneret og tilsvinet, de trues med voldtægt og da kvinderne siger fra, bliver de slået i jorden flere gange,« kan man læse i artiklen, der fortsætter:

»Kvinderne forsvarer sig og den tumult som opstår, får en større gruppe forbipasserende til at ligge sig imellem og bidrager dermed med til, at overfaldet stoppes.«

Den anden episode finder sted en uge efter – tidligt om morgenen lørdag den 27. september ved Folkets Park i Griffenfeldsgade.

Her bliver to kvinder overfuset med grove, sexistiske tilråb fra to mænd, da de omkring klokken 04 forlader værtshuset Trabi Bar.

Da den ene af kvinderne beder mændene om at stoppe chikanen bliver hun sparket så hårdt i hovedet, at hun besvimer.

Der er desværre ingen beskrivelse af overfaldsmændene. Ofrene er fra venstrefløjen får vi at vide og overfaldsmændene er sexistiske og homofobiske, men der mangler lige det, der kunne få denne demonstration til at gå op i en højere enhed end blot at være noget som Modkraft så ud til at have eneret til. Som, lad os sige en hvid højreradikal kliche måske? Men de strukturelle problemer antydes måske alligevel

– Vi er en gruppe kvinder, der bor på Nørrebro, der synes, det er vigtigt, at vi sammen løser de problemer og udfordringer, vi har i bydelen.

(…)

Den lokale forankring er vigtig for netværket, da man gerne vil undgå, at udefrakommende slår politisk plat på situationen.

– Vi ønsker ikke, at en eller anden Rasmus Jarlov-type skal demonstrere eller tale på vores vegne. Vi ønsker, at demonstrationen bliver sammen med vores naboer, ikke imod dem, fortæller kvinden fra 2200Unite.

Hmm, det er ikke problemer der kyses af mirakelkuren “Ingen racister i vores gader!” råben og de obligatoriske trusler om vold (stop volden eller vi smadrer dig, som Anders Matthesen ironiserede). Der skal heller ikke komme nogen udefra, som Rasmus Jarlov typerne, som kastede smuds på potemkimkulissen da han påpegede muslimsk antisemitisme på Nørrebro. Never again I say. Problemer i bydelen skal løses i fællesskab. Det lyder som et strukturelt og meget delikat problem på Nørrebro, men nærmere kommer vi ikke.

I stedet vil jeg lige vende tilbage til de glade dage med sammenhold og tolerance.

asyldemo_stop_deportations-32

Hvor smukt. Meget smukkere end samme periode i oktober i Århus. Her gik det ifølge Jyllands-Posten igen ud over en kvinde, hvis politiske og seksuelle orientering dog smagfuldt forblev en privatsag

“I Skt. Clemens Stræde blev en kvinde væltet omkuld, spyttet på, og så sparket i brystet. De skete ved tretiden, og vi kunne desværre ikke finde gerningsmændene, da vi kom frem,” siger vagtchefen.

Han udsender derfor en efterlysning. Begge gerningsmænd beskrives som somalisk af udseende.

Skrækkeligt. Men i Danmark er her plads nok - til hvem som helst.

Når Ulve hyler II

Akademia, Demografi, Diverse, Ligestilling, Multikultur, Race, Racisme, USA, venstrefløjen — Drokles on November 6, 2014 at 6:24 pm

Som nævnt tidligere har videoen af en ung mørkklædt kvinde der går gennem New Yorks gader vakt en del opsigt. I løbet af de ti timers vandring fik Shoshana Roberts, kvinden i sort, en del tilråb fra opmærksomme mænd. Gruppen Hollaback, der har produceret videoen, ville sætte fokus på mænds nogen gange ublu seksualisering af unge kvinder, men, som man selv kunne se, var det ikke bare mænd over en bred karm. Tilråbene og den uønskede opmærksomhed kom fra sorte og off-white amerikanere. Og det ramte lige ned i venstrefløjens ømme kognitive dissonans. Charles C W Cooke, giver et fremragende resume for National Review

As it has grown in popularity, the video has been transformed into a blank canvas, onto which America’s brave advocates of hyphenated-justice have sought to project their favored social theories. Evidently unwilling to let the spot stand on its own, Purdue’s Roxanne Gay wrote sadly that “it’s difficult and uncomfortable to admit that we have to talk about race/class/gender/sexuality/ability/etc, all at once.” Alas, she was not alone. Soon, the claims of “sexism” had been joined by accusations of “racism” and of “classism,” Hollaback had been forced to acknowledge that it had upset the more delicate among us, and those who had celebrated the video had been denounced as unreconstructed bigots. By this process was its message diluted and appropriated, the country’s most prominent peddlers of grievance and discord electing to squabble and bicker over its meaning, and to strip it of its value in favor of their own, fringe fixations.

In the exquisitely calibrated judgment of The Nation’s “racial justice” guru, Aura Bogado, the spot was “deeply problematic,” serving not to highlight the frequency with which women are bothered on the street, but instead perpetuating “the myth of the cult of white white womanhood by literally placing this white woman in neighborhoods where men of color will be the ones who catcall (or, in some instances, say hello to) her.” “Doing so,” Bogado writes, “makes it appear as if men of color are the perpetrators of all that is bad on this planet, which can only be balanced with the exigent need to therefore save white women above all else.” The only solution, she says, is to remake the video with a “universalizing” cast: the camera centering on, “say, a black trans woman.”

(…)

Consider how far its critics are stretching to discredit the experiment’s results. On Wednesday, Roxanne Gay suggested with palpable irritation that “the racial politics of the video are f****d up. Like, she didn’t walk through any white neighborhoods?” For her part, Salon’s Emily Gould went full circle, seeking to justify the behavior of the maligned cat-callers by submitting that they had been forced into it by the actions of white people writ large. “This kind of harassment,” Gould wrote, “can be a way marginalized groups talk back to the white gentrifiers taking over their neighborhoods.” In and of itself, this view strikes me as being grotesquely condescending — the perverse cousin, perhaps, of precisely the sort of racial stereotyping that progressives believe they have been divinely called upon to destroy.

To contend that the minorities depicted in the video are mere victims of circumstance and that they have been forced by their conditions into badgering innocent women on the street is to contend that those minorities lack agency, intelligence, sensitivity, and the capacity to reason — that they are child-like figures who act on their base instincts and who need excusing and explaining by their betters. Oddly enough, it is also to contend that the victim was either a “white gentrifier” herself, or a proxy for white gentrifiers, and that she therefore deserved the treatment she received. This presumption, it should go without saying, is typically anathema to the arbiters of feminist thought. One cannot help but wonder whether, weighed down by their own contradictions, the champions of “empowerment” have at last become what they despise themselves?

Og der er allerede fortaget flere efterligninger af Shoshana Roberts vandring: En hunk i New York, en transvestit i Los Angeles og en kvindelig kriger i Skyrim - hvor ellers?

Kort dokumentar om Obamas forhold til Israel

Obama kan ikke lide Israel, det er næppe nogen hemmelighed.

Theo van Gogh

Arabere, Diverse, Forbrydelse og straf, Jihad, Multikultur, Muslimer, Terror, Ytringsfrihed, islam — Drokles on November 2, 2014 at 7:19 am

I dag er det 10 år siden Theo van Gogh blev myrdet af en muslim. Grunden var at Theo van Gogh sammen med den senere hollandske politiker Ayaan Hirsi Ali havde lavet en kort film om islams kvindeundertrykkelse. Unødvendigt at sige, men jeg gør det alligevel, at venstrefløjen havde og stadigt har, mere ondt af islams renomme end de især kvinder det går ud over. Bag burkaen kan ingen høre dig skrige.

Mere muslimsk indskoling

Arabere, Diverse, Forbrydelse og straf, Frankrig, Jihad, Multikultur, Muslimer, Sharia, islam — Drokles on October 31, 2014 at 12:35 pm

Vi kan ikke leve i fred med hinanden.

Måske ikke ligefrem indskoling, men en så kort video retfærdiggør ikke en post. Fransk politi efterforsker en voldtægtssag det mest åbenlyse sted og trænges væk

Når ulve hyler

Demografi, Diverse, Ligestilling, Multikultur, Race, Racisme, Ytringsfrihed — Drokles on October 31, 2014 at 4:07 am

Skuespilleren Shoshana Roberts gik i 10 timer gennem New Yorks gader, mens hun blev filmet i skjul. Ideen var at vise, hvorledes nogle mænd hverken kan holde deres øjne eller tanker for sig selv

Bortset fra klammoerne, der følger hende er fleste kommentarer ikke ondsindede omend lettere kiksede til det ucharmerende. Og de giver måske et indtryk af en virkelighed, de fleste af os (desværre) er ikke er forundt, som Allahpundit pointerer på Hot Air, hvor han selv har følgende sigende anekdote

The only time I can recall being present when a woman was catcalled on the streets was once a few years ago when I was getting off the subway and a beautiful blonde woman dressed for a night out was getting on. Men stopped in their tracks; someone in the vicinity (no, not me) said, loudly enough for everyone nearby to hear, “Oh yeah, that’s a ten.”

“Oh yeah, that’s a ten” er en sigende bemærkning fordi den ikke anråber vores opmærksomhed, som “Se den røv!”, men selvfølgeligt antager den og sætter en kommentar på. Den er næsten bedre end videoen, var det ikke for den vandrende babe.

Nu er almindelig sexchikane på gadeplan, hvis maskuline komplimenter absolut skal kaldes det, ikke Monokulturs største interesse. Men det er chancen for lidt lummer racisme derimod. For at dømme efter udseende og stemmeføring kommer 2/3 af bemærkningerne fra negre. Og af resten virker det lettere latinohvidt. En neger har måske derfor indvendinger.

Når man slår ned i et kobbel ulve…

10 Hours of Walking in NYC as a Man - watch more funny videos

Ifølge BT har Shoshana Roberts siden modtaget trusler, men om dem ved vi ikke mere end at det øjensynlig blot er fra mænd.

Muslimsk indskoling

Arabere, Diverse, Muslimer, islam, muhammed — Drokles on October 30, 2014 at 11:24 am

Kulturcentre, kaldes moskeer tit, og her lærer børn, hvad muslimsk kultur er. Fra WND

An Ontario mosque is coming under fire for using young Muslim children to conduct mock beheadings in a school play.

Video footage of the Islamic Jaffari Center in Thornhill, Ontario, shows children as young as 4 years old watching and learning to conduct beheadings in a play that reportedly took place two years ago.

The video was featured on the Canada’s Sun News Network television program, “Byline with Brian Lilley.”

A young boy can be seen sitting on the floor as another boy approaches him from behind with a machete.

At the end of the play, the boy playing the part of the executioner announces, “Here are the heads.”

The footage can be found at the 3:30 mark:

Men endnu tidligere lærer muslimerne deres børn om kausalitet, som The Muslim Issue skriver

Another abusive Muslim parent. With parents like this, who needs enemies?

This video will really, really upset a lot of people. She appears to barely be a few months old yet she is already learning what abuse means in the Saudi household she had the misfortune to be born into. Absolutely barbaric to even consider beating a SMALL INFANT!

The video shows a Saudi Arabian father disciplining a small infant (possibly for crying). The voice of the callous mother can be heard coaxing her savage husband in the background.

The video was posted on the Arab version of al-Jazeera (not available on the English translated version) and spread through social media. The father is from Jedda in Saudi Arabia and its said that he was “only educating her”.

Det kaldes en bastonade.

Islamificering i fængslerne

Arabere, Diverse, Forbrydelse og straf, Muslimer, Sharia, USA, islam — Drokles on October 30, 2014 at 5:03 am

Hugh Fitzgerald fortæller på New English Review

Isn’t that the question that ought to be asked all over the Western world? Not to try to say that the mentally ill, who just happen to be converts to Islam, kill people, but that those who are psychically off, if they convert to anything, nowadays will almost certainly to convert to Islam.

So what is it about Islam that makes it so attractive to them?

Let’s give the answers now, again, before some clever fellows apply for a government grant of five or perhaps ten million dollars to answer, after ponderous studies, involving lots and lots of researchers, and papers, and conferences, and come, finally, tortuously, to the conclusions which you and I can come to right now, and spoil their well-paid, overpaid, fun.

1. Islam offers a Total Regulation of Life. Like the Junior Woodchucks of America, Huey, Dewey, and Louie, you get special Arabic words to learn: Allahu Akbar, alhumdulillah, Jihad, Kuffar, things like that. You get to make up a special name, in Arabic, for yourself. It can express your origin in a particular country: Al-Amriki, Al-Frangi, Al-Britani, just the way those to the manner born can be called Al-Misri (from Egypt) or Al-Shami or Al-Hijazi. You can give yourself a new first name: Stephen might choose to become Suleiman. It’s such fun. A new identity, and an instant Community of Bruvvers, fellow Believers, one for all and all for one (that can be especially important in prison).

2. Islam offers a Compleat Explanation of the Universe. Life is so confusing, so overwhelming. But to the True Believer, life suddenly beomes simple. See Eric Hoffer. There is the Enemy — in Islam,it’s the non-Muslims, the Unbelievers, the Kuffars, the Ungrateful Ones. .There is the Cause for which one subsumes one’s own personality (not that such people ever had much of one to begin with), ready to do everything, ideally, for that Cause. And Islam is all about a Cause — the Cause of Islam itself. The true object of worship in Islam is not Allah, but Islam. It is for Islam that we live and die. And Muslims, to the precise extent that they take Islam to heart (and someone may not take Islam to heart, and then do so, but converts ordinarily are among the most fanatical, the least willilng to modify their behavior, or to embarrassedly or uneasily try to ignore some of the tenets and teachings of Islam).

3. In prisons in the Western world, where Musliims represent such a disproportionate number of those incarcerated (in France Muslims may be 5% of the population, but constitute 60% of the prison population, and similar figures can be found in every other country in Western Europe) Islam is attractive as a Gang, the biggest and most dangerous Gang, and the one you want to belong to, for your own protection against others, and of course, against that Muslim Gang. Western governments have yet to do the obvious and sane thing, which would be to put Muslims in prisons for Muslims only, keeping them away from others who might otherwise convert to this dangerous doctrine.

4. Islam legitimizes criminal behavior. It makes the convert feel good about his behavior, not ashamed or guilty. Have you raped, or stolen from, or killed people, peope who are not Muslims? That’s not only not a crime, but they have it coming to them. Not only have you not done wrong, but if you continue to do what you are doing, you can see it in a new light: you are merely helping yourself to the Jizyah that the Infidel nation-state, for now, prevents you from claiming. If you rape seductively-dressed Western women, that is women who aren’t wearing a niqab, or chador, or even a hijab, and whose skirts may be short, and who may wear lipstick and rouge, then they are asking for it. The little English girls who were made sex slaves deserved what they got. So for a certain kind of convert to Islam, his life now becomes justifiable; he’s been a warrior for Islam all along.

5. Islam provides a permanent source of enmity — the Infidel — whom you can blame for all of your woes. That’s very relaxing. In the Western world, we find so many different things to blame if things go wrong — and things always go wrong. But in Islam, you can always blame the Infidel for everything. And that’s what Musilms do, with their conspiracy theorizing, all the time.

6. So that’s why criminals and homicidal maniacs find Islam so attractive. Do you know of any homicidal maniacs who decided to convert to Judaism or Buddhism? No, I haven’t, either. And if a criminal converts to Christianity, say in prison, aren’t we all relieved to hear it, don’t you feel he’s done the one thing that might help change him? Of course you do. Now imagine the glad tidings reach you that that same prisoner converted not to Christianity, but to Islam. Now how do you feel?

Lysner det?

Demografi, Diverse, Forår?, Generation Identitaire, Indvandring, Multikultur, Muslimer, islam — Drokles on October 29, 2014 at 8:58 pm

Hooligans i Holland råber “Allah, din mor er en mær” under kampen mellem Feyenoord og Besiktas

I Milano samlede man 10.000 imod illegal indvandring

I Køln

Ja, det er helt bevægende. Franskmændene sørger for at have et ideologisk udgangspunkt, men også de ruster sig

Gode mænd sover trygt fordi hårde mænd er villige til at forsvare dem.

Mere om venstrefløjens ideosynkrasier

Diverse, Multikultur, Muslimer, Ytringsfrihed, islam, venstrefløjen — Drokles on October 28, 2014 at 11:10 pm

Ben Afflecks udfald mod TV-værten Bill Maher og bestseller ateisten Sam Harris har startet en hård debat på venstrefløjen om værdier overfor sympatier. Venstrefløjen (den del som i USA betegnes the liberals) har, hvis det er gået nogens næse forbi, glemt nogle af de værdier, de for årtier siden besmykkede sig med. Værdier som tolerance, frihed, ytringsfrihed, religionskritik osv til fordel for et romantisk billede af tilbagestående kulturer, der skulle tjene som en levende anklage mod højrefløjens kristne, heteronormative arvesynd.

Bill Maher og Sam Harris angreb netop venstrefløjens manglende evne til at bekæmpe islamisk fundamentalisme og Harris kaldte ligefrem islam for the motherload of bad ideas. Affleck blev i det traditionelle fjendebilledes univers og kaldte deres tankegan racistisk. Raymond Ibrahim i Frontpage Magazine kaster sig blandt andet over Afflecks væsentligste fejlslutning; ”Conflating Muslim Teachings with Muslim People“, som er et gennemgående tema i venstrefløjens tænkning

At one point, after the other speakers made certain statistical points, Affleck made the following outburst, to much applause: “How about the more than a billion people [Muslims], who aren’t fanatical, who don’t punish women, who wanna go to school, have some sandwiches, pray five times a day, and don’t do any of the things you’re saying of all Muslims. It’s stereotyping.”

Again, Affleck conflates the actions of people—Muslims—with the teachings of a religion—Islam. Going back to the apostasy example, Islamic law clearly teaches that those who abandon Islam—including as the world recently saw, one pregnant Christian woman, Meriam Ibrahim—are to be executed.   One can therefore say that Sharia calls for the death of apostates.

But can one say with similar certainty that every single Muslim alive today believes that the apostasy penalty should be upheld? Obviously not. Yet this is not a reflection of Islam; it is a reflection of individual human freedom—a freedom that ironically goes against Islamic teaching.

Nonetheless, this conflation of Islam with Muslims is an all too common approach used to shield the former from criticism.   (See this 2007 video where I respond more fully to this question from a concerned reporter.)

Dennis Praeger kommenterede New York Times  lidt oversete Mr. Kristof i National Review

Then the New York Times columnist, Mr. Kristof, offered his take:

The picture you’re painting is to some extent true, but it is hugely incomplete. It is certain that plenty of fanatics and jihadis are Muslim, but [so are] the people who are standing up to them — Malala [the Pakistani twelve-year-old shot and critically wounded by Islamists for attending school and advocating that other girls do so], Muhammad Ali Dadkha in Iran, in prison for nine years for speaking up for Christians, [and] a friend that I had in Pakistan [who] was shot this year, Rashid Rahman, for defending people accused of apostasy.

Kristof’s response is a frequent one. So it is worth responding to.

It is quite true that there are heroic Muslims who are fighting the Islamists throughout the Muslim world — and that some of them have been murdered for doing so. These people are moral giants. But their existence has nothing to do with the criticisms leveled by Maher and Harris, since they never said or implied that all Muslims are bad. There were heroic Germans who fought Hitler and the Nazis. If Kristof had been present when people criticized Germany’s values, would he have labeled them “Germanophobes?”

But it was later in the dialogue that Kristof expressed the most dishonest of the Left’s arguments on this issue: “The great divide is not between Islam and the rest. It’s rather between the fundamentalists and the moderates in each faith.”

“In each faith,” Mr. Kristof?

Where, sir, are the Christian and Jewish jihadists? The only Jewish state in the world is one of the freest countries on earth, with protections — for minority religions and women and homosexuals — unknown anywhere in the Muslim world. And virtually every free country across the globe is in the Christian world.

Presumably, these are just “ugly” facts.

This debate was valuable. Even more valuable would be if Mr. Maher and Mr. Harris came to realize that the death of Judeo-Christian values and their being supplanted by leftism is producing hundreds of millions of people who think like Ben Affleck and Nicholas Kristof.

Og Den frafaldne muslim Sadaf Ali føler sig på Free Thoughts Blogs svigtet af Affleks og kommer midt i vældet af selvretfærdighed med et par udmærkede pointer (der nu mest er udmærkede fordi hun tjener som en af de kokosnødder venstrefløjsere føler sig svigtet af)

I have a personal appeal to Ben Affleck, after his participation on Bill Maher’s show, because it is attitudes like his that have historically made little to no room for ex-Muslims, secular, reformists, liberal or progressive Muslims to own a dialogue that is supposed to be ours to discuss.

I think it is important to notice how I referred to the event on Maher’s show as a scuffle and not a debate. That’s because it wasn’t a debate. There was no exchange of ideas. In fact, the mere suggestion of the criticism of Islam was slammed as ‘racist’ and ‘Islamophobic’ by Affleck.

(…)

Affleck uses the death and suffering of my peoples as a tool to suffocate the discourse of Islam and as an Afghan-Canadian, I am upset by this. How dare you? Islam as an ideology is not flawless. No ideology is. Much in the same way Affleck played a part in the film ‘Dogma’ to satirize or criticize Christianity, others are allowed to criticize Islam. Furthermore, Islamists must be confronted. Those who preach the death of apostates and LGBTQ peoples, and seek the inequality of genders and wish to marginalize minorities must be condemned.

The thing that made the scuffle worse was the straw man argument. No one there on the panel insinuated that the flaws in Islam should be used as a justification to murder innocent people halfway across the world. Affleck fails to acknowledge the pain, alienation, ostracization and abuse people also face here in the name of someone’s literal interpretations of Islam. Islamism isn’t just about terrorism. Islamism poisons our cultures around the globe. Islamism hurts me. Islamism hurts apostates. Islamism hurts non-Muslims. Islamism hurts our families. And most of all: Islamism hurts Muslims.

(…)

Am I then a racist for criticizing scriptures that clearly condone the infantilization of women, the allowance for physical means to control women and the condemnation of a queer apostate such as myself? Am I, as a secular humanist who is directly affected by my cultural and religious communities, communities in which homophobia, transphobia, sexism and racism exist, not entitled to acceptance, love and dignity? What about those brave and selfless individuals in theocratic regimes who suffer and put their life on the line for their rights? Am I then asking for bombs to be dropped on innocent people? Are activists in theocratic states asking for bombs to be dropped on them?

Og en anden pe… indvandrer, den pakistanske Eiynah ”born and raised in Islam” problematiserer også Afflecks forfladigelse af racismebegrebet og underkendelse af islamkritik i et åbent brev i Pakistan Today

Why should any set of ideas be above criticism, Ben?

Why are Muslims being ‘preserved’ in some time capsule of centuries gone by? Why is it okay that we continue to live in a world where our women are compared to candy waiting to be consumed? Why is it okay for women of the rest of the world to fight for freedom and equality while we are told to cover our shameful bodies? Can’t you see that we are being held back from joining this elite club known as the 21st century?

Noble liberals like yourself always stand up for the misrepresented Muslims and stand against the Islamophobes, which is great but who stands in my corner and for the others who feel oppressed by the religion? Every time we raise our voices, one of us is killed or threatened. I am a blogger and illustrator, no threat to anyone, Ben, except for those afraid of words and drawings. I want the freedom to express myself without the very real fear that I might be killed for it. Is that too much to ask?

(…)

What you did by screaming ‘racist!’ was shut down a conversation that many of us have been waiting to have. You helped those who wish to deny there are issues, deny them.

Jeg har valgt at ignorere hendes vrøvlende og selvmodsigende ævl om eksistensen af islamofobi. Venstrefløjen er på vej ind i en alvorlig identitetskrise. De er i deres fokus på deres traditionelle modstandere på højrefløjen blevet blinde over for at den kritik der rejses af multikulturalisme generelt og islam især, lige så vel kunne være deres egen kritik. At hæjrefløjen ikke blot advarer om at deres distinkte værdier er truet, men at de fælles værdier vi bygger vores samfund på er truet. At det er selve ideen om et fællesskab, hvor vi tillader andre det samme som vi tillader os selv. Venstrefløjen må befri sig selv fra den falske skyldfølelse som marxisternes pseudointellektuelle fortælling har forført dem med. Venstrefløjen er nødt til at erkende prisen for de antidemokratiske og undergravende overgangskrav.

Først kommer lørdag…

Først kommer lørdag, så kommer søndag, hedder den islamiske drøm om at slagte først jøderne og så de kristne. En ikke helt ny dokumentar, man ganske god at få indsigt af.

Islam udfolder sig i Levanten

En far stener sin datter til døde i Levanten efter islams foreskrifter.

Robert Spencer pointerer normaliteten

Stoning adulterers is not “extremist”; it is Islamic law. The caliph Umar, one of Muhammad’s closest companions, even maintained that it was originally in the Qur’an:

‘Umar said, “I am afraid that after a long time has passed, people may say, “We do not find the Verses of the Rajam (stoning to death) in the Holy Book,” and consequently they may go astray by leaving an obligation that Allah has revealed. Lo! I confirm that the penalty of Rajam be inflicted on him who commits illegal sexual intercourse, if he is already married and the crime is proved by witnesses or pregnancy or confession.” Sufyan added, “I have memorized this narration in this way.” ‘Umar added, “Surely Allah’s Apostle carried out the penalty of Rajam, and so did we after him.” (Bukhari 8.82.816)

“Allah’s Apostle” is, of course, Muhammad, who did indeed carry out stonings. Here is the hadith in which he challenges the rabbis about stoning, and in which there is amidst the barbarism and brutality a final act of love and compassion:

The Jews came to Allah’s Apostle and told him that a man and a woman from amongst them had committed illegal sexual intercourse. Allah’s Apostle said to them, “What do you find in the Torah (old Testament) about the legal punishment of Ar-Rajm (stoning)?” They replied, (But) we announce their crime and lash them.” Abdullah bin Salam said, “You are telling a lie; Torah contains the order of Rajm.” They brought and opened the Torah and one of them solaced his hand on the Verse of Rajm and read the verses preceding and following it. Abdullah bin Salam said to him, “Lift your hand.” When he lifted his hand, the Verse of Rajm was written there. They said, “Muhammad has told the truth; the Torah has the Verse of Rajm. The Prophet then gave the order that both of them should be stoned to death. (‘Abdullah bin ‘Umar said, “I saw the man leaning over the woman to shelter her from the stones.” (Bukhari 4.56.829)

I Kobanes ruiner fandt man det måske mest foruroligende billede til dato på en død gedekneppers mobiltelefon

0011699707

Raymond Ibrahim skriver i Middle East Forum om sexslaver i islam

During Muhammad’s jihad on the Jews of Khaybar, he took for himself from among the spoils of war one young woman, a teenager, Safiya bint Huyay, after hearing of her beauty. (Earlier the prophet had bestowed her on another Muslim jihadi, but when rumor of her beauty reached him, the prophet reneged and took her for himself.)

Muhammad “married” Safiya hours after he had her husband, Kinana, tortured to death in order to reveal hidden treasure. And before this, the prophet’s jihadis slaughtered Safiya’s father and brothers.

While Islamic apologists have long tried to justify this account—often by saying that Muhammad gave her the honor of “marriage” as opposed to being a concubine and that she opted to convert to Islam—they habitually fail to cite what Islamic sources record, namely Baladhuri’s ninth century Kitab Futuh al-Buldan (”Book of Conquests”).

According to this narrative, after the death of Muhammad, Safiya confessed that “Of all men, I hated the prophet the most—for he killed my husband, my brother, and my father,” before “marrying” (or, less euphemistically, raping) her.

So there it is. Muhammad seized for himself as rightfully earned booty (or ghanima) a young woman; he took her after killing everyone dear to her—husband, father, brothers, etc.

And, according to authoritative Islamic sources, she hated him for it.

If that is not rape, what is?

Islam er, som islam er og nu gives hele pakken.

Clarkson oplever den rumænske løsning

Diverse, England, Fascisme, Historie — Drokles on October 22, 2014 at 3:29 pm

Man er vant til at berømtheder sludrer uhæmmet udenfor deres fagområde og som regel med en venstredrejer og antinational slagside. Skuespilleren Sean Penn sagde således ifølge Daily Mail i 2012 at ‘The world today is not going to tolerate any ludicrous and archaic commitment to colonialist ideology.’ med henvisning til Englands ret til at forsvare sit herredømme over Falklandsøerne, sit folk og folkets ret til at vedblive at være engelske mod Argentinas invasion. Roger Daltrey fra Pink Floyd var i samme ånd ked af sit lands kolonialistiske fortid “when we were out raping and plundering and stealing”. Musikeren Morrisey, der skrev nummeret ‘Margaret [Thatcher] On The Guillotine’ erklærede også ifølge Daily Mail “We all know that the Malvinas [Falklands] are Argentina’s,” til sit argentinske publikum ved en koncert i Buenos Aires samme år, hvor hans band optrådte tillige optrådte med ‘WE HATE WILLIAM AND KATE’ t-shirts.

article-2111076-120d7e46000005dc-47_634x356

Og derfor er det forfriskende når en vestlig berømthed viser glæde og stolthed ved sit land og dets bedrifter, det der kaldes at være kontroversiel. Den engelske TV vært for underholdningsprogrammet Top Gear Jeremy Clarkson er blevet stenet ud af et forsmået Argentina for at gå imod revisionismen skriver Daily Mail

Jeremy Clarkson has told how he and his Top Gear team were forced to flee Argentina under police escort as furious thugs tried to ‘kill’ them.

Rock-throwing protesters vowed to ‘barbecue’ the controversial motoring show host after a row over the star’s number plate boiled over.

Trouble erupted after a photo of Clarkson, 54, driving a Porsche with the number plate H982 FKL, circulated online, enraging Falklands War veterans who claimed it referred to the 1982 conflict.

The presenter yesterday said the violent protest was ’state-organised’ accusing the Argentinians of taking advantage of their visit for ‘political capital’.

Når et regime benytter pøbelvold kaldes det Den Rumænske Løsning. Navnet stammer fra det rumænske overgangsregimes løsning på de folkelige protester, der forlangte deres opgør med Ceaucescu tilbage. I titusindvis havde folk samlet sig på Universitetspladsen i Bukarest for at tvinge demokratiske valg igennem, men kommunist og kupmager Ion Iliescu hev minearbejderne ned fra bjergene og fortalte dem at hippier var skyld i at de ikke havde fået løn i måneder. Bevæbnet med bla jernrør blev arbejderklassen forvanlet til en bøllehær der på regimets vegne knuste middelklassens oprør for folkets frihed. Kvasitotalitære styreformer elsker den slags. Man ser den også i Ægypten, Hong Kong, Iran og Sverige.

Argentinerne har selvfølgelig intet krav på Falklandsøerne. Falklandsøerne er britisk herredømme og har været det snart 200 år. Der bor stor set kun briter og britiske efterkommere på øen og ønsket om at forblive under britisk overherredømme er massivt. Argentina derimod er en kolonialistisk opfindelse, bestående af kolonialister fra Europa, der har fordrevet indianerne og indiansk kultur. Og fordi de åbenbart stadig sidder fast i drømmene fra deres bestialske militærdiktatur vil vi lige mindes hvorledes de blev sparket hjem, hvor de end ikke hører til.

Eller

Eller en lidt klodset dramatisering

Eller (endnu) et gensyn, med den fremragende The Falklands Play

Next Page »

Monokultur kører på WordPress